Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2008

01-10-2008

Current Status of Surgical Management of Acute Cholecystitis in the United States

Authors: Nicholas Csikesz, Rocco Ricciardi, Jennifer F. Tseng, Shimul A. Shah

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We attempted to determine population-based outcomes of laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).

Methods

We used the National Hospital Discharge Surveys from 2000 through 2005. Annual medical and demographic data from a national sample of discharge records from nonfederal, short-stay hospitals were queried. We identified all patients who underwent LC or OC for AC. The main outcome measures were the rate of LC or OC and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. One million patients underwent cholecystectomy (859,747 LCs; 152,202 OCs) for AC during 2000–2005.

Results

Of the cases started laparoscopically, 9.5% were converted to OC. Compared to OC, patients who underwent LC were more likely to be discharged home (91% vs. 70%), carry private insurance (47% vs. 30%), suffer less morbidity (16% vs. 36%), and have a lower unadjusted mortality (0.4% vs. 3.0%). OC was associated with a 1.3-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.1–1.4) in perioperative morbidity compared to LC after adjusting for patient and hospital factors.

Conclusions

Most patients in the 21st century with AC undergo LC with a low conversion rate and low morbidity. In the general population with acute cholecystitis, LC results in lower morbidity and mortality rates than OC even in the setting of open conversion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J et al (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:385–387PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J et al (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:385–387PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies: The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078 Erratum: N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078 Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies: The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078 Erratum: N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078
3.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 170:55–59PubMedCrossRef Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 170:55–59PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee VS, Chari RS, Cucchiaro G et al (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:527–532PubMedCrossRef Lee VS, Chari RS, Cucchiaro G et al (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:527–532PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D et al (2001) Treatment of acute cholecystitis: a comparison of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:398–401PubMedCrossRef Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D et al (2001) Treatment of acute cholecystitis: a comparison of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:398–401PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe? Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe? Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49PubMedCrossRef Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wiesen SM, Unger SW, Barkin JS et al (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis. Am J Gastroenterol 88:334–337PubMed Wiesen SM, Unger SW, Barkin JS et al (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis. Am J Gastroenterol 88:334–337PubMed
11.
go back to reference Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R et al (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:334–340PubMedCrossRef Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R et al (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:334–340PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dennison C, Pokras R (2000) Design and operation of the National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1988 redesign. Vital Health Stat 39:1–42 Dennison C, Pokras R (2000) Design and operation of the National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1988 redesign. Vital Health Stat 39:1–42
13.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shamiyeh A, Danis J, Wayand W et al (2007) A 14-year analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion—when and why? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:271–276PubMedCrossRef Shamiyeh A, Danis J, Wayand W et al (2007) A 14-year analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion—when and why? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:271–276PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schafer M, Krahenbuhl L, Buchler MW (2001) Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 182:291–297PubMedCrossRef Schafer M, Krahenbuhl L, Buchler MW (2001) Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 182:291–297PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kama NA, Doganay M, Dolapci M et al (2001) Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:965–968PubMedCrossRef Kama NA, Doganay M, Dolapci M et al (2001) Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:965–968PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D et al (2001) Treatment of acute cholecystitis: a comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:398–401PubMedCrossRef Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D et al (2001) Treatment of acute cholecystitis: a comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:398–401PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Teixeira JP, Saraiva AC, Cabral AC et al (2000) Conversion factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 47:626–630PubMed Teixeira JP, Saraiva AC, Cabral AC et al (2000) Conversion factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 47:626–630PubMed
21.
go back to reference Koperna T, Kisser M, Schulz F (1999) Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 46:753–757PubMed Koperna T, Kisser M, Schulz F (1999) Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 46:753–757PubMed
22.
go back to reference Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E et al (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 14:755–760PubMedCrossRef Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E et al (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 14:755–760PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E et al (1997) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:407–414PubMedCrossRef Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E et al (1997) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:407–414PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Estes NC, McElhinney C, Estes MA et al (1996) Acute cholecystitis treated urgently by nonselective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 62:598–601PubMed Estes NC, McElhinney C, Estes MA et al (1996) Acute cholecystitis treated urgently by nonselective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 62:598–601PubMed
25.
go back to reference Willsher PC, Sanabria JR, Gallinger S et al (1999) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure. J Gastrointest Surg 3:50–53PubMedCrossRef Willsher PC, Sanabria JR, Gallinger S et al (1999) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure. J Gastrointest Surg 3:50–53PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R et al (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:334–340PubMedCrossRef Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R et al (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:334–340PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217:233–236PubMedCrossRef Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217:233–236PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E et al (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial. World J Surg 21:540–545PubMedCrossRef Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E et al (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial. World J Surg 21:540–545PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr et al (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397PubMedCrossRef Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr et al (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Norrby S, Herlin P, Holmin T et al (1983) Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial. Br J Surg 70:163–165PubMedCrossRef Norrby S, Herlin P, Holmin T et al (1983) Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial. Br J Surg 70:163–165PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST et al (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467PubMedCrossRef Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST et al (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL et al (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767PubMedCrossRef Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL et al (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M et al (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–565PubMedCrossRef Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M et al (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–565PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290:2168–2173PubMedCrossRef Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290:2168–2173PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR et al (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295:1549–1555PubMedCrossRef Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR et al (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295:1549–1555PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current Status of Surgical Management of Acute Cholecystitis in the United States
Authors
Nicholas Csikesz
Rocco Ricciardi
Jennifer F. Tseng
Shimul A. Shah
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9679-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

World Journal of Surgery 10/2008 Go to the issue