Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2008

01-09-2008

Complications of Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 123 Patients

Authors: S. D. Mansfield, C. Jensen, A. S. Phair, O. T. Kelly, S. B. Kelly

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loop ileostomies are often formed in order to defunction distal anastomoses. The aim of this study was to review the complications following closure of loop ileostomies.

Methods

This is a retrospective case note analysis of all loop ileostomy closures performed in the Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust (population over 500,000) over a 5-year period between 2001 and 2005.

Results

A total of 123 case records were reviewed. Complications occurred in 41 patients (33.3%), with 9 patients (7.3%) requiring further intervention. There were 4 (3.3%) postoperative deaths. Complications were more common in patients with increased comorbidity (p = 0.0007) and postoperative death was more frequent among the elderly (p = 0.0006). Postoperative death was more common in those patients who had their stomas created during surgery (elective or emergency) for diverticular disease (3 patients, p = 0.006). Patients with diverticular disease had significantly higher comorbidity and peritoneal contamination at the time of primary surgery. Ileostomy reversal after anterior resection for cancer was associated with a lower complication rate than the rest of the cohort (26%, p = 0.0003) but there was no significant difference in mortality. Neither the grade of the surgeon, the case volume, or the anastomotic technique affected postoperative morbidity. Reoperation was more common in patients whose closure procedure took less time (p = 0.002) and in those who had a shorter wait from creation to reversal of the stoma (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Reversal of loop ileostomy may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Increasing the delay from creation to closure may result in fewer complications.There is an increased risk in older patients with more comorbidity, particularly when the primary procedure is for diverticular disease with significant peritoneal contamination.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Gooszen A, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J et al (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85(1):76–79PubMedCrossRef Gooszen A, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J et al (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85(1):76–79PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khoo REH, Cohen MM, Chapman GM et al (1994) Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 167(5):519–522PubMedCrossRef Khoo REH, Cohen MM, Chapman GM et al (1994) Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 167(5):519–522PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bell C, Asolati M, Hamilton E et al (2005) A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy reversal. Am J Surg 190(5):717–720PubMedCrossRef Bell C, Asolati M, Hamilton E et al (2005) A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy reversal. Am J Surg 190(5):717–720PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edwards DP, Donaldson DR, Chisholm EM (1998) Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(1):33–35PubMed Edwards DP, Donaldson DR, Chisholm EM (1998) Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(1):33–35PubMed
6.
go back to reference Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M et al (2006) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(7):1011–1017PubMedCrossRef Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M et al (2006) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(7):1011–1017PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E et al (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):243–250PubMedCrossRef Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E et al (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):243–250PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG et al (2000) Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy. Ann Surg 231(2):202–204PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG et al (2000) Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy. Ann Surg 231(2):202–204PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bain IM, Keighley MRB, Patel R (1996) Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78(6):555–556PubMed Bain IM, Keighley MRB, Patel R (1996) Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78(6):555–556PubMed
10.
go back to reference Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ et al (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177(6):463–466PubMedCrossRef Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ et al (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177(6):463–466PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fasth S, Hultén L (1994) Loop ileostomy: a superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. World J Surg 8(3):401–407CrossRef Fasth S, Hultén L (1994) Loop ileostomy: a superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. World J Surg 8(3):401–407CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D et al (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73(7):566–570PubMedCrossRef Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D et al (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73(7):566–570PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van de Pavoordt HDWM, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG et al (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2(4):214–217PubMedCrossRef Van de Pavoordt HDWM, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG et al (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2(4):214–217PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Toole GC, Hyland JMP, Grant DC et al (1999) Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 188(1):6–9PubMedCrossRef O’Toole GC, Hyland JMP, Grant DC et al (1999) Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 188(1):6–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK et al (1993) Temporary loop ileostomy for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 80(5):628–630PubMedCrossRef Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK et al (1993) Temporary loop ileostomy for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 80(5):628–630PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Amin SM, Memon MA, Armitage NC et al (2001) Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(4):246–249PubMed Amin SM, Memon MA, Armitage NC et al (2001) Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(4):246–249PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lewis P, Bartolo DCC (1990) Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72(4):263–265PubMed Lewis P, Bartolo DCC (1990) Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72(4):263–265PubMed
Metadata
Title
Complications of Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 123 Patients
Authors
S. D. Mansfield
C. Jensen
A. S. Phair
O. T. Kelly
S. B. Kelly
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9669-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

World Journal of Surgery 9/2008 Go to the issue