Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2008

Open Access 01-04-2008

Evaluation of Protocol Uniformity Concerning Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in The Netherlands

Authors: Linda S. G. L. Wauben, Richard H. M. Goossens, Daan J. van Eijk, Johan F. Lange

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Iatrogenic bile duct injury remains a current complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One uniform and standardized protocol, based on the “critical view of safety” concept of Strasberg, should reduce the incidence of this complication. Furthermore, owing to the rapid development of minimally invasive surgery, technicians are becoming more frequently involved. To improve communication between the operating team and technicians, standardized actions should also be defined. The aim of this study was to compare existing protocols for laparoscopic cholecystectomy from various Dutch hospitals.

Methods

Fifteen Dutch hospitals were contacted for evaluation of their protocols for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All evaluated protocols were divided into six steps and were compared accordingly.

Results

In total, 13 hospitals responded—5 academic hospitals, 5 teaching hospitals, 3 community hospitals—of which 10 protocols were usable for comparison. Concerning the trocar positions, only minor differences were found. The concept of “critical view of safety” was represented in just one protocol. Furthermore, the order of clipping and cutting the cystic artery and duct differed. Descriptions of instruments and apparatus were also inconsistent.

Conclusions

Present protocols differ too much to define a universal procedure among surgeons in The Netherlands. The authors propose one (inter)national standardized protocol, including standardized actions. This uniform standardized protocol has to be officially released and recommended by national scientific associations (e.g., the Dutch Society of Surgery) or international societies (e.g., European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons). The aim is to improve patient safety and professional communication, which are necessary for new developments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, Rauws EA, Lameris JS (2004) Bile duct injury after cholecystectomy: risk of mortality substantially higher. [Galwegletsel na cholecystectomie: sterk verhoogde kans op sterfte.] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:1020–1024PubMed Gouma DJ, Rauws EA, Lameris JS (2004) Bile duct injury after cholecystectomy: risk of mortality substantially higher. [Galwegletsel na cholecystectomie: sterk verhoogde kans op sterfte.] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:1020–1024PubMed
2.
go back to reference Janssen IMC, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 90:799–803PubMedCrossRef Janssen IMC, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 90:799–803PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schol FPG, Go PMNYH, Gouma DJ (1994) Risk analysis for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases. Br J Surg 81:1786–1788PubMedCrossRef Schol FPG, Go PMNYH, Gouma DJ (1994) Risk analysis for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases. Br J Surg 81:1786–1788PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Reuver PR, Rauws EA, Bruno MJ, et al (2007) Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. Surgery 142:1–9PubMedCrossRef de Reuver PR, Rauws EA, Bruno MJ, et al (2007) Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. Surgery 142:1–9PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:543–547PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:543–547PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury—surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132:826–835PubMedCrossRef Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury—surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132:826–835PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Callery MP (2006) Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations. Surg Endosc 20:1654–1658PubMedCrossRef Callery MP (2006) Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations. Surg Endosc 20:1654–1658PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed
11.
go back to reference Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460–469PubMedCrossRef Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460–469PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Plaisier PW, Pauwels MMA, Lange JF (2001) Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print? HPB Surg 3:197–199 Plaisier PW, Pauwels MMA, Lange JF (2001) Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print? HPB Surg 3:197–199
13.
go back to reference Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington DC Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington DC
14.
go back to reference Degani A, Wiener EL (1993) Cockpit checklists: concepts, design and use human factors. Hum Factors 35:345–359 Degani A, Wiener EL (1993) Cockpit checklists: concepts, design and use human factors. Hum Factors 35:345–359
15.
go back to reference Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA (2006) Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 15:231–234PubMedCrossRef Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA (2006) Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 15:231–234PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alarcon A, Berguer R (1996) A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations. Surg Endosc 10:916–919PubMedCrossRef Alarcon A, Berguer R (1996) A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations. Surg Endosc 10:916–919PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cleary K, Kinsella A (2004) OR2020: the operating room of the future. Turf Valley Conference Center, Ellicott City, MD Cleary K, Kinsella A (2004) OR2020: the operating room of the future. Turf Valley Conference Center, Ellicott City, MD
19.
go back to reference Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, van der Elst M, et al (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study. Surg Endosc 21:275–279PubMedCrossRef Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, van der Elst M, et al (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study. Surg Endosc 21:275–279PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wauben LSGL, Van Veelen MA, Gossot D, et al (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire amongst 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20:1268–1274PubMedCrossRef Wauben LSGL, Van Veelen MA, Gossot D, et al (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire amongst 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20:1268–1274PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Chandler JG, Voyles CR, Floore TL, et al (1997) Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps. J Gastrointest Surg 1:138–145PubMedCrossRef Chandler JG, Voyles CR, Floore TL, et al (1997) Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps. J Gastrointest Surg 1:138–145PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bhoyrul SB, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, et al (2001) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192:677–683PubMedCrossRef Bhoyrul SB, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, et al (2001) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192:677–683PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A (2004) Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 198:163–173PubMedCrossRef Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A (2004) Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 198:163–173PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:868–874PubMedCrossRef Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:868–874PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, et al (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–559PubMedCrossRef Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, et al (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–559PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, et al (2004) Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 187:475–481PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, et al (2004) Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 187:475–481PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wu SC, Chen FC, Lo CJ (2005) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 29:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef Wu SC, Chen FC, Lo CJ (2005) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 29:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wright KD, Wellwood JM (1998) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Br J Surg 85:191–194PubMedCrossRef Wright KD, Wellwood JM (1998) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Br J Surg 85:191–194PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, et al (2006) EAES guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Springer, Berlin Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, et al (2006) EAES guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Springer, Berlin
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Protocol Uniformity Concerning Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in The Netherlands
Authors
Linda S. G. L. Wauben
Richard H. M. Goossens
Daan J. van Eijk
Johan F. Lange
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9323-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

World Journal of Surgery 4/2008 Go to the issue