Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2008

Open Access 01-02-2008

Surgical Simulator Design and Development

Author: Jenny Dankelman

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), it became necessary to develop training methods to learn skills outside the operating room. Several training simulators have become commercially available, but fundamental research into the requirements for effective and efficient training in MIS is still lacking. Three aspects of developing a training program are investigated here: what should be trained, how it should be trained, and how to assess the results of training. In addition, studies are presented that have investigated the role of force feedback in surgical simulators. Training should be adapted to the level of behavior: skill-based, rule-based, or knowledge-based. These levels can be used to design and structure a training program. Extra motivation for training can be created by assessment. During MIS, force feedback is reduced owing to friction in the laparoscopic instruments and within the trocar. The friction characteristics vary largely among instruments and trocars. When force feedback is incorporated into training, it should include the large variation in force feedback properties as well. Training different levels of behavior requires different training methods. Although force feedback is reduced during MIS, it is needed for tissue manipulation, and therefore force application should be trained as well.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dunkin B, Adrales GL, Apelgren K, et al. (2007) Surgial simulation: a current review. Surg Endosc 21:357–366PubMedCrossRef Dunkin B, Adrales GL, Apelgren K, et al. (2007) Surgial simulation: a current review. Surg Endosc 21:357–366PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Fosse E (2005) Simulators in surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 14:214–223CrossRef Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Fosse E (2005) Simulators in surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 14:214–223CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, et al. (2006) Surgical simulation, a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300PubMedCrossRef Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, et al. (2006) Surgical simulation, a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators: how to choose. Surg Endosc 17:1943–1950PubMedCrossRef Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators: how to choose. Surg Endosc 17:1943–1950PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558PubMedCrossRef Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chmarra MK, Grimbergen CA, Dankelman J (2007) Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol (in press) Chmarra MK, Grimbergen CA, Dankelman J (2007) Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol (in press)
7.
go back to reference Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, et al. (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1521–1532CrossRef Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, et al. (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1521–1532CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules and knowledge; signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 13:257–266 Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules and knowledge; signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 13:257–266
9.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, et al. (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182:110–116PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, et al. (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182:110–116PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dankelman J (2004) Surgical robots and other training tools in minimally invasive surgery. Proc IEEE Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 3:2459–2464 Dankelman J (2004) Surgical robots and other training tools in minimally invasive surgery. Proc IEEE Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 3:2459–2464
11.
go back to reference Stassen HG, Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA, et al. (2001) Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Annu Rev Control 25:111–122CrossRef Stassen HG, Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA, et al. (2001) Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Annu Rev Control 25:111–122CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wentink M, Stassen LPS, Alwayn I, et al. (2003) Rasmussen’s model of human behavior in laparoscopy training. Surg Endosc 17:1241–1246PubMedCrossRef Wentink M, Stassen LPS, Alwayn I, et al. (2003) Rasmussen’s model of human behavior in laparoscopy training. Surg Endosc 17:1241–1246PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dankelman J, Wentink M, Stassen HG (2003) Human reliability and training in minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 12:1229–1235 Dankelman J, Wentink M, Stassen HG (2003) Human reliability and training in minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 12:1229–1235
14.
go back to reference Dersossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487CrossRef Dersossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Waseda M, Inaki N, Mailaender L, et al. (2005) An innovative trainer for surgical procedures using animal organs. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 14:262–266CrossRef Waseda M, Inaki N, Mailaender L, et al. (2005) An innovative trainer for surgical procedures using animal organs. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 14:262–266CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Monteny LJ, et al. (2006) Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills—the Simendo. Surg Endosc 20:511–518PubMedCrossRef Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Monteny LJ, et al. (2006) Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills—the Simendo. Surg Endosc 20:511–518PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dankeman J, Chmarra MK, Verdaasdonk EGG, et al. (2005) Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills—review. Minim Invas Ther Allied. Technol 14:247–256CrossRef Dankeman J, Chmarra MK, Verdaasdonk EGG, et al. (2005) Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills—review. Minim Invas Ther Allied. Technol 14:247–256CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ackerman PL (1990) A correlation analysis of skill specificity: learning, abilities, and individual differences. J Exp Psychol Learn 16:883–901CrossRef Ackerman PL (1990) A correlation analysis of skill specificity: learning, abilities, and individual differences. J Exp Psychol Learn 16:883–901CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Van Merrienboer JG, Clark RE, de Croock MBM (2002) Blueprints for complex learning: the 4C/ID model. Educ Techn Res Dev 50(2):39–64CrossRef Van Merrienboer JG, Clark RE, de Croock MBM (2002) Blueprints for complex learning: the 4C/ID model. Educ Techn Res Dev 50(2):39–64CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mahmood T, Darzi A (2004) The learning curve for colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 18:1224–1230PubMedCrossRef Mahmood T, Darzi A (2004) The learning curve for colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 18:1224–1230PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pellegrini CA (2003) Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Am Coll Surg 196:933–937PubMedCrossRef Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pellegrini CA (2003) Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Am Coll Surg 196:933–937PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hance J, Aggerwal R, Moorthy K, et al. (2005) Assessment of psychomotor skills acquisition during laparoscoic cholecystectomy courses. Am J Surg 190:507–511PubMedCrossRef Hance J, Aggerwal R, Moorthy K, et al. (2005) Assessment of psychomotor skills acquisition during laparoscoic cholecystectomy courses. Am J Surg 190:507–511PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chmarra MK, Bakker NH, Grimbergen CA, et al. (2006) TrEndo, a device for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments in training setups. Sensors Actuators A 126:328–334CrossRef Chmarra MK, Bakker NH, Grimbergen CA, et al. (2006) TrEndo, a device for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments in training setups. Sensors Actuators A 126:328–334CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chmarra MK, Kolkman W, Jansen FW, et al. (2007) The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system. Surg Endosc May 4; [Epub ahead of print] Chmarra MK, Kolkman W, Jansen FW, et al. (2007) The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system. Surg Endosc May 4; [Epub ahead of print]
25.
go back to reference Chmarra MK, Jansen FW, Wentink M, et al. (2006) Performance during distinct phases in laparoscopic surgery. Proc EAES Berlin 112 Chmarra MK, Jansen FW, Wentink M, et al. (2006) Performance during distinct phases in laparoscopic surgery. Proc EAES Berlin 112
26.
go back to reference Sjoerdsma W (1998) Surgeons at work. time and action analysis of the laparoscopic surgical process. Delft: PhD thesis, DUT, ISBN 90-9012069-6, pp 1–103 Sjoerdsma W (1998) Surgeons at work. time and action analysis of the laparoscopic surgical process. Delft: PhD thesis, DUT, ISBN 90-9012069-6, pp 1–103
27.
go back to reference den Boer K (2001) Surgical task performance. assessment using time-action analysis. Delft: PhD thesis, DUT; ISBN 90-370-0189-0, pp 1–134 den Boer K (2001) Surgical task performance. assessment using time-action analysis. Delft: PhD thesis, DUT; ISBN 90-370-0189-0, pp 1–134
28.
go back to reference Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRef Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler, ISBN 1-57675-042-6 Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler, ISBN 1-57675-042-6
30.
go back to reference Hutchington L (1999) Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ 318:1267–1269 Hutchington L (1999) Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ 318:1267–1269
31.
go back to reference Dankelman J, Stassen HG, Grimbergen CA, editors (2005) Engineering for Patient Safety: Issues in Minimally Invasive Procedures. Hillside, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 1–300 ISBN 0-8058-4905-X Dankelman J, Stassen HG, Grimbergen CA, editors (2005) Engineering for Patient Safety: Issues in Minimally Invasive Procedures. Hillside, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 1–300 ISBN 0-8058-4905-X
32.
go back to reference Sjoerdsma W, Herder JL, Horward MJ, et al. (1997) Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments, Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 6:274–278CrossRef Sjoerdsma W, Herder JL, Horward MJ, et al. (1997) Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments, Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 6:274–278CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Den Boer KT, Herder JL, Sjoerdsma W, et al. (1999) Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors: what can you feel? Surg Endosc 13:869–873CrossRef Den Boer KT, Herder JL, Sjoerdsma W, et al. (1999) Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors: what can you feel? Surg Endosc 13:869–873CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EAM, Pasdeloup A, van der Pijl AJ, et al. (2004) The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically. Surg Endosc 18:980–985PubMedCrossRef Heijnsdijk EAM, Pasdeloup A, van der Pijl AJ, et al. (2004) The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically. Surg Endosc 18:980–985PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Schooleman A, Dankelman J (2007) Friction dynamics of trocars. Surg Endosc Dec 13; [Epub ahead of print] Van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Schooleman A, Dankelman J (2007) Friction dynamics of trocars. Surg Endosc Dec 13; [Epub ahead of print]
36.
go back to reference de Visser H, Heijnsdijk EAM, Herder JL, et al. (2002) Forces and displacements in colon surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1426–1430PubMedCrossRef de Visser H, Heijnsdijk EAM, Herder JL, et al. (2002) Forces and displacements in colon surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1426–1430PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EAM, de Visser H, Dankelman J, et al. (2003) Inter- and intra-individual variability of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue. Surg Endosc 17:1923–1926PubMedCrossRef Heijnsdijk EAM, de Visser H, Dankelman J, et al. (2003) Inter- and intra-individual variability of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue. Surg Endosc 17:1923–1926PubMedCrossRef
38.
39.
go back to reference Rosen J (2002) The bluedragon—a system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics Automation 1876–1881 Rosen J (2002) The bluedragon—a system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics Automation 1876–1881
40.
go back to reference Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA (2005) System approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1017–1021PubMedCrossRef Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA (2005) System approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1017–1021PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors (2000) To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, p 287 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors (2000) To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, p 287
42.
go back to reference Blom EM, Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, et al. (2007) Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training. Surg Endosc Feb 7; [Epub ahead of print] Blom EM, Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, et al. (2007) Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training. Surg Endosc Feb 7; [Epub ahead of print]
43.
go back to reference Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J (2003) Metrics for objective assessment; preliminary summary of the surgical skills workshops, Surg Endosc 17:220–226PubMedCrossRef Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J (2003) Metrics for objective assessment; preliminary summary of the surgical skills workshops, Surg Endosc 17:220–226PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, et al. (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182:110–116PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, et al. (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182:110–116PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Den Boer KT, de Jong T, Dankelman J, et al. (2001) Problems with laparoscopic instruments—opinion of experts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:147–156CrossRef Den Boer KT, de Jong T, Dankelman J, et al. (2001) Problems with laparoscopic instruments—opinion of experts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:147–156CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS van der Elst M, et al. (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study. Surg Endosc 21:275–279PubMedCrossRef Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS van der Elst M, et al. (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study. Surg Endosc 21:275–279PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical Simulator Design and Development
Author
Jenny Dankelman
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9150-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

World Journal of Surgery 2/2008 Go to the issue