Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Article

Delay from Symptom Onset Increases the Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Authors: Sirwan M. Hadad, Jayant S. Vaidya, Lee Baker, Hoey C. Koh, Timothy P. Heron, Alastair M. Thompson

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Randomized trials suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed on first admission for acute cholecystitis. However, this is not widely practiced, possibly because of a perceived high conversion rate. We hypothesized that delay from onset of symptoms may increase the conversion rate.

Methods

We performed a retrospective case note review of patients undergoing emergency cholecystectomy in a single institution between January 2002 and December 2005. We analyzed whether delay from onset of symptoms was related to the conversion rate in patients with a histopathological diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.

Results

Of patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution, 32.4% (197/608) had acute cholecystitis on histopathology. The conversion rate of those with acute cholecystitis was considerably higher (24.4%) than for those with other pathologies (6.3%). For patients with acute cholecystitis, the conversion rates increased with duration of symptoms: 9.5%, 16.1%, 38.9%, and 38.6% for delays of 0–2 days, 3–4 days, 5–6 days, and > 6 days from symptom onset, respectively (chi-square for trend = 14.27, DF = 1, p = 0.00016). Most conversions were due to the presence of acute inflammatory adhesions.

Conclusions

Early intervention for acute cholecystitis (preferably within 2 days of onset of symptoms) is most likely to result in successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy; increasing delay is associated with conversion to open surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee HK, Han HS, Min SK, et al. (2005) Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:463–466PubMedCrossRef Lee HK, Han HS, Min SK, et al. (2005) Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:463–466PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, et al. (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467PubMedCrossRef Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, et al. (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lo CM, Liu CL, Lai EC, et al. (1996) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 223:37–42PubMedCrossRef Lo CM, Liu CL, Lai EC, et al. (1996) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 223:37–42PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van der Linden W, Sunzel H (1970) Early versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg 120:7–13PubMedCrossRef van der Linden W, Sunzel H (1970) Early versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg 120:7–13PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilson RG, Macintyre IM, Nixon SJ, et al. (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. BMJ 305:394–396PubMedCrossRef Wilson RG, Macintyre IM, Nixon SJ, et al. (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. BMJ 305:394–396PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, et al. (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767PubMedCrossRef Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, et al. (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, et al. (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:147–155PubMedCrossRef Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, et al. (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:147–155PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T (2005) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today 35:553–560PubMedCrossRef Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T (2005) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today 35:553–560PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA (2002) Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:20–22PubMed Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA (2002) Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:20–22PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, et al. (2002) Acute cholecystitis—room for improvement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:10–13PubMed Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, et al. (2002) Acute cholecystitis—room for improvement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:10–13PubMed
11.
go back to reference Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, et al. (2004) Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J 80:292–294PubMedCrossRef Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, et al. (2004) Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J 80:292–294PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, et al. (2005) Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 92:586–591PubMedCrossRef Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, et al. (2005) Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 92:586–591PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, et al. (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18:1323–1327PubMedCrossRef Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, et al. (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18:1323–1327PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liguori G, Bortul M, Castiglia D (2003) The treatment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Ital Chir 74:517–521PubMed Liguori G, Bortul M, Castiglia D (2003) The treatment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Ital Chir 74:517–521PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bhattacharya D, Senapati PS, Hurle R, et al. (2002) Urgent versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparative study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:538–542PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharya D, Senapati PS, Hurle R, et al. (2002) Urgent versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparative study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:538–542PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Tesi D, et al. (2002) How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg 183:232–236PubMedCrossRef Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Tesi D, et al. (2002) How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg 183:232–236PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, et al. (2004) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 51:346–348PubMed Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, et al. (2004) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 51:346–348PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kitano S, Matsumoto T, Aramaki M, et al. (2002) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:534–537PubMedCrossRef Kitano S, Matsumoto T, Aramaki M, et al. (2002) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:534–537PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cheema S, Brannigan AE, Johnson S, et al. (2003) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Ir J Med Sci 172:128–131PubMedCrossRef Cheema S, Brannigan AE, Johnson S, et al. (2003) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Ir J Med Sci 172:128–131PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Knight JS, Mercer SJ, Somers SS, et al. (2004) Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate. Br J Surg 91:601–604PubMedCrossRef Knight JS, Mercer SJ, Somers SS, et al. (2004) Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate. Br J Surg 91:601–604PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Mantzioka A, et al. (1996) Postoperative pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 77:448–452PubMed Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Mantzioka A, et al. (1996) Postoperative pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 77:448–452PubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee KT, Shan YS, Wang ST, et al. (2005) Verress needle decompression of distended gallbladder to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1388–1392PubMed Lee KT, Shan YS, Wang ST, et al. (2005) Verress needle decompression of distended gallbladder to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1388–1392PubMed
Metadata
Title
Delay from Symptom Onset Increases the Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Authors
Sirwan M. Hadad
Jayant S. Vaidya
Lee Baker
Hoey C. Koh
Timothy P. Heron
Alastair M. Thompson
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9050-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

World Journal of Surgery 6/2007 Go to the issue

Reply

Reply

Reply

Reply