Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2007

01-01-2007

Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparison between the Initial Experience in the Invention Phase and Introductory Phase of the New Surgical Technique

Authors: Marcin Barczyński, MD, PhD, Aleksander Konturek, MD, PhD, Filip Gołkowski, MD, PhD, Stanisław Cichoń, MD, PhD, Bohdan Huszno, MD, PhD, Klaus Peitgen, MD, Martin K. Walz, MD, PhD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Today, the posterior retroperitoneoscopic technique has become a standard procedure in adrenal surgery. The procedure allows direct access to the adrenal glands, but it seems to be difficult because of the uncommon anatomic view. This study compares the learning period of the new procedure of “posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy” in the primary invention phase and the secondary introductory phase in a different hospital 10 years later.

Materials and Methods

The analysis included 100 posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies (PRA) and involved 50 procedures in each center. Group A consisted of 44 patients (14 males, 30 females; age: 48.7 ± 14.5 years) undergoing surgery between 07/1994 and 8/1996 (24 right, 26 left; 8 Cushing adenomas, 14 Conn adenomas, 11 pheochromocytomas, 7 nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas, 10 ACTH-dependent adrenal hyperplasias). Group B consisted of 50 patients (12 males, 38 females; mean age 59.3 ± 10.7 years) operated between 01/2004 and 01/2006 (28 right, 22 left tumors; 5 Cushing adenomas, 12 Conn adenomas, 4 pheochromocytomas, 29 nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas). All PRAs were performed with the patient in the prone position with 3–4 trocars placed caudally in the region of the 11th and 12th ribs. In group A, the surgical team developed the technique of PRA themselves. Before their first PRA, the surgical team of group B was introduced to the technique by the group A surgeons and afterwards were supervised continuously.

Results

No serious intraoperative or postoperative complication occurred in either group. Group A experienced 7 conversions to open surgery, whereas group B had one conversion and one early reoperation due to bleeding (P = 0.03; χ2-test). The mean operative time was 117 ± 41 minutes versus 83 ± 35 minutes (group A and B respectively; P < 0.001; t-test). Estimated blood loss was similar in the two groups (47.2 ± 46.2 ml versus 54 ± 16.3 ml, group A versus B, respectively; P = 0.36; t-test).

Conclusions

The study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the new surgical method of PRA both when it is employed in the early phase of invention, as well as when performed by surgeon-learners. After comprehensive training, the operative time and conversion rate are dramatically reduced, allowing for a short learning period.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Duh QY. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the optimal surgical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Tech 2001;11:409–413CrossRef Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Duh QY. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the optimal surgical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Tech 2001;11:409–413CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Feliciotti F, et al. Anterior, lateral, and posterior retroperitoneal approaches in endoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:96–99PubMedCrossRef Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Feliciotti F, et al. Anterior, lateral, and posterior retroperitoneal approaches in endoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:96–99PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kalan MMH, Tillou G, Kulick A, et al. Preforming laparoscopic adrenalectomy safely. Arch Surg 2004;139:1243–1247PubMedCrossRef Kalan MMH, Tillou G, Kulick A, et al. Preforming laparoscopic adrenalectomy safely. Arch Surg 2004;139:1243–1247PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Taura P, et al. Retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: is it advantageous? Surg Endosc 1999;13:86–90PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Taura P, et al. Retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: is it advantageous? Surg Endosc 1999;13:86–90PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Higashihara E, Tanaka Y, Horie S, et al. A case report of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1992;83:1130–1133PubMed Higashihara E, Tanaka Y, Horie S, et al. A case report of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1992;83:1130–1133PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gagner M, Lacroix C, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Lacroix C, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gagner M, Lacroix A, Prinz RA, et al. Early experience with laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy. Surgery 1993;114:1120–1124PubMed Gagner M, Lacroix A, Prinz RA, et al. Early experience with laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy. Surgery 1993;114:1120–1124PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the importance of flank approach in the left lateral decubitus position. Surg Endosc 1994;8:135–138PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the importance of flank approach in the left lateral decubitus position. Surg Endosc 1994;8:135–138PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Henry JF, Defechereux T, Raffaelli M, et al. Complications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of 169 consecutive procedures. World J Surg 2000;24:1342–1346PubMedCrossRef Henry JF, Defechereux T, Raffaelli M, et al. Complications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of 169 consecutive procedures. World J Surg 2000;24:1342–1346PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Valeri A, Borelli A, Presenti L, et al. The influence of new technologies on laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Our personal experience with 91 patients. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1274–1279PubMedCrossRef Valeri A, Borelli A, Presenti L, et al. The influence of new technologies on laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Our personal experience with 91 patients. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1274–1279PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Whittle DE, Schroeder D, Purchas SH, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal left adrenalectomy in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome. Aust N Z J Surg 1994;64:375–376PubMed Whittle DE, Schroeder D, Purchas SH, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal left adrenalectomy in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome. Aust N Z J Surg 1994;64:375–376PubMed
12.
go back to reference Walz MK, Peitgen K, Krause U, et al. Die dorsale retroperitoneoscopische Adrenalektomie—eine neue operative Methode. Zentralbl Chir 1995;120:53PubMed Walz MK, Peitgen K, Krause U, et al. Die dorsale retroperitoneoscopische Adrenalektomie—eine neue operative Methode. Zentralbl Chir 1995;120:53PubMed
13.
go back to reference Walz MK, Peitgen K, Hoermann R, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopy as a new minimally invasive approach for adrenalectomy: restults of 30 adrenalectomies in 27 patients. World J Surg 1996;20:769–774PubMedCrossRef Walz MK, Peitgen K, Hoermann R, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopy as a new minimally invasive approach for adrenalectomy: restults of 30 adrenalectomies in 27 patients. World J Surg 1996;20:769–774PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Baba S, Miyajima A, Uchida A, et al. A posterior lumbar approach for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: assessment of surgical efficacy. Urology 1997;50:19–24PubMedCrossRef Baba S, Miyajima A, Uchida A, et al. A posterior lumbar approach for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: assessment of surgical efficacy. Urology 1997;50:19–24PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Kageyama S, Hirano Y, Ushiyama et al. Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis. J Urol 2001;166:437–443 Suzuki K, Kageyama S, Hirano Y, Ushiyama et al. Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis. J Urol 2001;166:437–443
16.
go back to reference Yagisawa T, Ito F, Ishikawa N, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lateral versus posterior approach. J Endourol 2004;18:661–664PubMedCrossRef Yagisawa T, Ito F, Ishikawa N, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lateral versus posterior approach. J Endourol 2004;18:661–664PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rubinstein M, Gill IS, Aron M, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 2005;174:442–445PubMedCrossRef Rubinstein M, Gill IS, Aron M, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 2005;174:442–445PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, van der Hast E, Steyeberg EW, et al. Retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: open or endoscopic? World J Surg 1998;22:1246–1249PubMedCrossRef Bonjer HJ, van der Hast E, Steyeberg EW, et al. Retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: open or endoscopic? World J Surg 1998;22:1246–1249PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stanek A, Kowalczyk M, Kaska L, et al. One hundred and ten consecutive uncomplicated retroperitoneal videoscopic adrenalectomies—Polish multicentre study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:272–277PubMedCrossRef Stanek A, Kowalczyk M, Kaska L, et al. One hundred and ten consecutive uncomplicated retroperitoneal videoscopic adrenalectomies—Polish multicentre study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:272–277PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Walz MK, Peitgen K, Walz MV, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned within five years. World J Surg 2001;25:728–734PubMedCrossRef Walz MK, Peitgen K, Walz MV, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned within five years. World J Surg 2001;25:728–734PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Walz MK, Peitgen K, Diesing D, et al. Partial versus total adrenalectomy by the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach: early and long-term results of 325 consecutive procedures in primary adrenal neoplasias. World J Surg 2004;28:1323–1329PubMedCrossRef Walz MK, Peitgen K, Diesing D, et al. Partial versus total adrenalectomy by the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach: early and long-term results of 325 consecutive procedures in primary adrenal neoplasias. World J Surg 2004;28:1323–1329PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Russel CF, Hamberger B, van Heerden JA, et al. Adrenalectomy: anterior or posterior approach? Am J Surg 1982;144:322–324CrossRef Russel CF, Hamberger B, van Heerden JA, et al. Adrenalectomy: anterior or posterior approach? Am J Surg 1982;144:322–324CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Prinz R. A comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies. Arch Surg 1995;130:786–787 Prinz R. A comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies. Arch Surg 1995;130:786–787
24.
go back to reference Walz MK, Petersenn S, Koch JA, et al. Endoscopic treatment of large primary adrenal tumours. Br J Surg 2005;92:719–723PubMedCrossRef Walz MK, Petersenn S, Koch JA, et al. Endoscopic treatment of large primary adrenal tumours. Br J Surg 2005;92:719–723PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Al-Saleem T, et al. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland. J Urol 2005;174:446–450PubMedCrossRef Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Al-Saleem T, et al. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland. J Urol 2005;174:446–450PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference David G, Yoav M, Gross D, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2004;18:771–773PubMedCrossRef David G, Yoav M, Gross D, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2004;18:771–773PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparison between the Initial Experience in the Invention Phase and Introductory Phase of the New Surgical Technique
Authors
Marcin Barczyński, MD, PhD
Aleksander Konturek, MD, PhD
Filip Gołkowski, MD, PhD
Stanisław Cichoń, MD, PhD
Bohdan Huszno, MD, PhD
Klaus Peitgen, MD
Martin K. Walz, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0083-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

World Journal of Surgery 1/2007 Go to the issue