Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2006

01-04-2006

Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions

Authors: Samuel Szomstein, MD, Emanuele Lo Menzo, MD, PhD, Conrad Simpfendorfer, MD, Nathan Zundel, MD, Raul J. Rosenthal, MD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intra-abdominal adhesions constitute between 49% and 74% of the causes of small bowel obstruction. Traditionally, laparotomy and open adhesiolysis have been the treatment for patients who have failed conservative measures or when clinical and physiologic derangements suggest toxemia and/or ischemia. With the increased popularity of laparoscopy, recent promising reports indicate the feasibility and potential superiority of the minimally invasive approach to the adhesion-encased abdomen.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and to provide technical tips that help in the success of this technique.

Results

The most important predictive factor of adhesion formation is a history of previous abdominal surgery ranging from 67%–93% in the literature. Conversely, 31% of scars from previous surgery have been free of adhesions, whereas up to 10% of patients without any prior surgical scars will have spontaneous adhesions of the bowel or omentum. Most intestinal obstructions follow open lower abdominopelvic surgeries such as colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy. The most common complications associated with adhesions are small bowel obstruction (SBO) and chronic pain syndrome. The treatment of uncomplicated SBO is generally conservative, especially with incomplete obstruction and the absence of systemic toxemia, ischemia, or strangulation. When conservative treatment fails, surgical options include conventional open or minimally invasive approaches; the latter have become increasing more popular for lysis of adhesions and the treatment of SBO. Generally, 63% of the length of a laparotomy incision is involved in adhesion formation to the abdominal wall. Furthermore, the incidence of ventral hernia after a laparotomy ranges between 11% and 20% versus the 0.02%–2.4% incidence of port site herniation. Additional benefits of the minimally invasive approaches include a decreased incidence of wound infection and postoperative pneumonia and a more rapid return of bowel function resulting in a shorter hospital stay. In long-term follow up, the success rate of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions remains between 46% and 87%. Operative times for laparoscopy range from 58 to 108 minutes; conversion rates range from 6.7% to 43%; and the incidence of intraoperative enterotomy ranges from 3% to 17.6%. The length of hospitalization is 4–6 days in most series.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions seems to be safe in the hands of well-trained laparoscopic surgeons. This technique should be mastered by the advanced laparoscopic surgeon not only for its usefulness in the pathologies discussed here but also for adhesions commonly encountered during other laparoscopic procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:60–63PubMed Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:60–63PubMed
2.
go back to reference Pickleman J. Small bowel obstruction. In Zinner MJ, editor, Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, London, Prentice-Hall, 1997;1159–1172 Pickleman J. Small bowel obstruction. In Zinner MJ, editor, Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, London, Prentice-Hall, 1997;1159–1172
3.
go back to reference Welch P. Adhesions. In Welch JP, editor, Bowel Obstruction, Philadelphia, Saunders, 1990;154–165 Welch P. Adhesions. In Welch JP, editor, Bowel Obstruction, Philadelphia, Saunders, 1990;154–165
4.
go back to reference Harris EA. Reoperation on the abdomen encased in adhesions. Am J Surg 2002;184:499–504; discussion 504PubMed Harris EA. Reoperation on the abdomen encased in adhesions. Am J Surg 2002;184:499–504; discussion 504PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Bizer LS. Small bowel obstruction: the role of nonoperative treatment in simple intestinal obstruction and predictive criteria for strangulation obstruction. Surgery 1981;89:407–413PubMed Bizer LS. Small bowel obstruction: the role of nonoperative treatment in simple intestinal obstruction and predictive criteria for strangulation obstruction. Surgery 1981;89:407–413PubMed
7.
go back to reference Beck DE, Opelka FG, Baily HR, et al. Incidence of small bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:241–248PubMed Beck DE, Opelka FG, Baily HR, et al. Incidence of small bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:241–248PubMed
8.
go back to reference Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 1973;126:345–353PubMed Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 1973;126:345–353PubMed
9.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:392–398CrossRefPubMed Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:392–398CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1456–1457 Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1456–1457
11.
go back to reference Duepree HJ. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:177–181CrossRefPubMed Duepree HJ. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:177–181CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chopra R. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 2003;69:966–968PubMed Chopra R. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 2003;69:966–968PubMed
13.
go back to reference Akman PC. A study of five hundred incisional hernias. J Int Coll Surg 1962;37:125–142PubMed Akman PC. A study of five hundred incisional hernias. J Int Coll Surg 1962;37:125–142PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sato Y. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:476–479CrossRefPubMed Sato Y. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:476–479CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, et al. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2004;18:898–906CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, et al. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2004;18:898–906CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Di Lorenzo N. [Impact of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of chronic abdominal pain syndrome] Chir Ital 2002;54:367–378PubMed Di Lorenzo N. [Impact of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of chronic abdominal pain syndrome] Chir Ital 2002;54:367–378PubMed
17.
go back to reference Stringel G. Laparoscopy in the management of children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 1999; 3:215–219 Stringel G. Laparoscopy in the management of children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 1999; 3:215–219
18.
go back to reference Herrick SE. Human peritoneal adhesions are highly cellular, innervated, and vascularized. J Pathol 2000;192:67–72CrossRefPubMed Herrick SE. Human peritoneal adhesions are highly cellular, innervated, and vascularized. J Pathol 2000;192:67–72CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Khaitan L. Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of Seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 2003;17:247–253PubMed Khaitan L. Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of Seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 2003;17:247–253PubMed
20.
go back to reference Swank DJ, Van Erp WF, Repelaer Van Driel OJ, et al. A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:88–94CrossRefPubMed Swank DJ, Van Erp WF, Repelaer Van Driel OJ, et al. A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:88–94CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Salky BA, Laparoscopic enteroclysis. In Phillips EH, Rosenthal RJ, editors, Operative Strategies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1995;207–210 Salky BA, Laparoscopic enteroclysis. In Phillips EH, Rosenthal RJ, editors, Operative Strategies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1995;207–210
22.
go back to reference Swank DJ, Swank-Bordewijk SC, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomized controlled multicenter trial. Lancet 2003;361:1247–1251CrossRefPubMed Swank DJ, Swank-Bordewijk SC, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomized controlled multicenter trial. Lancet 2003;361:1247–1251CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bastug DF, Trammell SW, Boland JP, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1991;1:259–262 Bastug DF, Trammell SW, Boland JP, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1991;1:259–262
24.
go back to reference Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Pharand D. Laparoscopic surgery in acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparose Endosc 1994;4:289–296 Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Pharand D. Laparoscopic surgery in acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparose Endosc 1994;4:289–296
25.
go back to reference Frager DH, Baer JW. Role of CT in evaluating patients with small bowel obstruction. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 1995;16:127–140CrossRef Frager DH, Baer JW. Role of CT in evaluating patients with small bowel obstruction. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 1995;16:127–140CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sarr MG, Bulkley GB, Zuidema GD. Preoperative recognition of intestinal strangulation: prospective evaluation of diagnostic capability. Am J Surg 1983;145:176–182CrossRefPubMed Sarr MG, Bulkley GB, Zuidema GD. Preoperative recognition of intestinal strangulation: prospective evaluation of diagnostic capability. Am J Surg 1983;145:176–182CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bryk D. Functional evaluation of small bowel obstruction by successive abdominal roentgenograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1972;116:262–275 Bryk D. Functional evaluation of small bowel obstruction by successive abdominal roentgenograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1972;116:262–275
28.
go back to reference Maglinte DDT. Peterson LA, Uahey TN, et al. Enteroclysis in partial small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1984;147:325–329PubMed Maglinte DDT. Peterson LA, Uahey TN, et al. Enteroclysis in partial small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1984;147:325–329PubMed
29.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, et al. Closed loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 1992;185:769–775PubMed Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, et al. Closed loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 1992;185:769–775PubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Ibrahim IM, Wolodiger F, Sussman B, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small-bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1012–1015CrossRefPubMed Ibrahim IM, Wolodiger F, Sussman B, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small-bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1012–1015CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Navez B, Arimont JM, Gujiot P. Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction. A review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:2146–2150PubMed Navez B, Arimont JM, Gujiot P. Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction. A review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:2146–2150PubMed
33.
go back to reference Peritoneal adhesiolysis. In National Inpatient Profile 1993. Baltimore: HCIA Inc, 1994;653–655 Peritoneal adhesiolysis. In National Inpatient Profile 1993. Baltimore: HCIA Inc, 1994;653–655
34.
go back to reference Ray NF, Larsen Jr JW, Stillman RJ, et al. Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:271–276PubMed Ray NF, Larsen Jr JW, Stillman RJ, et al. Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:271–276PubMed
36.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Kuijpers JH, et al. Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J Surg 1998;85:1242–1245CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Kuijpers JH, et al. Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J Surg 1998;85:1242–1245CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Zbar RI, Crede WB, McKhann CF, et al. The postoperative incidence of small bowel obstruction following standard, open appendectomy and cholecystectomy: a six-year retrospective cohort study at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Conn Med 1993;57:123–127PubMed Zbar RI, Crede WB, McKhann CF, et al. The postoperative incidence of small bowel obstruction following standard, open appendectomy and cholecystectomy: a six-year retrospective cohort study at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Conn Med 1993;57:123–127PubMed
38.
go back to reference Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membranea prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306PubMed Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membranea prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306PubMed
39.
go back to reference Akman PC. A study of five hundred incisional hernias. J Int Coll Surg 1962;37:125–142PubMed Akman PC. A study of five hundred incisional hernias. J Int Coll Surg 1962;37:125–142PubMed
40.
go back to reference Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG. Incisional hernias following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:881–884PubMed Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG. Incisional hernias following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:881–884PubMed
41.
go back to reference Pekmezci S, Altinli E, Saribeyoglu K, et al. Enteroclysis-guided laparoscopic adhesiolysis in recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;12:165–170 Pekmezci S, Altinli E, Saribeyoglu K, et al. Enteroclysis-guided laparoscopic adhesiolysis in recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;12:165–170
42.
go back to reference Levard H, Boudet M, Msika S, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 2001;71:641–646CrossRef Levard H, Boudet M, Msika S, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 2001;71:641–646CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Suter M, Zermatten P, Hakie N, et al. Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success of failure? Surg Endosc 2000;14:478–484PubMed Suter M, Zermatten P, Hakie N, et al. Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success of failure? Surg Endosc 2000;14:478–484PubMed
44.
go back to reference Al-Mulhim AA. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 2000;14:157–160CrossRefPubMed Al-Mulhim AA. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 2000;14:157–160CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montario T, et al. Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2000;10:155–159 Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montario T, et al. Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2000;10:155–159
46.
go back to reference Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA, et al. Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 1999;13:695–698CrossRefPubMed Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA, et al. Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 1999;13:695–698CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Leon EL, Metzger A, Tsiotos GG, et al. Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction: indications and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:132–140PubMed Leon EL, Metzger A, Tsiotos GG, et al. Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction: indications and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:132–140PubMed
48.
go back to reference Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 1998;85:84–87CrossRefPubMed Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 1998;85:84–87CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstructions. Am J Surg 2004;187:464–470CrossRefPubMed Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstructions. Am J Surg 2004;187:464–470CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions
Authors
Samuel Szomstein, MD
Emanuele Lo Menzo, MD, PhD
Conrad Simpfendorfer, MD
Nathan Zundel, MD
Raul J. Rosenthal, MD
Publication date
01-04-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7778-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

World Journal of Surgery 4/2006 Go to the issue