Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2006

01-11-2006

Effect of Jejunal and Biliary Decompression on Postoperative Complications and Pancreatic Leakage Arising from Pancreatojejunostomy after Pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors: Yoichi Ishizaki, MD, Jiro Yoshimoto, MD, Hiroyuki Sugo, MD, Ken Miwa, MD, Seiji Kawasaki, MD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since its introduction, reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy has undergone numerous modifications, leading to a dramatic decline in the mortality rate. However, the reported morbidity rate, due mainly to pancreatic leakage, still remains high.

Methods

Between January 1999 and April 2005, 102 consecutive patients underwent pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients treated by biliary decompression alone (n = 58) were compared with patients treated by jejunal decompression alone (n = 40). Four patients who underwent both biliary and jejunal decompression were excluded from the study.

Results

Patients who underwent jejunal decompression had a significantly lower incidence of overall postoperative complications (P = 0.028), pancreatic leakage (P = 0.009), and infection (P = 0.011) than patients who underwent biliary decompression. Only one patient who underwent biliary decompression died as a direct result of pancreatic leakage.

Conclusions

Discontinuation of biliary decompression with postoperative jejunal decompression using tube jejunostomy may be a good option in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, because it appears to reduce the incidence of overall postoperative complications, pancreatic leakage, and infection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995;130:295–299PubMed Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995;130:295–299PubMed
2.
go back to reference Miedema BW, Sarr MG, Van Heerden JA, et al. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 1992;127:945–950PubMed Miedema BW, Sarr MG, Van Heerden JA, et al. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 1992;127:945–950PubMed
3.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Russell RCG, Bramhall S, et al. UK low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients. UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. Br J Surg 1997;84:1370–1376PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Russell RCG, Bramhall S, et al. UK low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients. UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. Br J Surg 1997;84:1370–1376PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Böttger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164–172PubMedCrossRef Böttger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164–172PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248–260PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248–260PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Trede M, Schwall G. The complications of pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 1988;207:39–47PubMed Trede M, Schwall G. The complications of pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 1988;207:39–47PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM. Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 1994;168:295–298PubMedCrossRef Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM. Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 1994;168:295–298PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 1997;113:983–994PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 1997;113:983–994PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Child CG. Pancreaticojejunostomy and other problems associated with the pancreas. Ann Surg 1944;119:845–855PubMed Child CG. Pancreaticojejunostomy and other problems associated with the pancreas. Ann Surg 1944;119:845–855PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:580–592PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:580–592PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, et al. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 1991;11:1831–1848PubMed Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, et al. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 1991;11:1831–1848PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 2003;134:766–771PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 2003;134:766–771PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mason GR. Pancreatogastrostomy as reconstruction for pancreatoduodenectomy: review. World J Surg 1999;23:221–226PubMedCrossRef Mason GR. Pancreatogastrostomy as reconstruction for pancreatoduodenectomy: review. World J Surg 1999;23:221–226PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 2004;139:327–335PubMedCrossRef Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 2004;139:327–335PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hamanaka Y, Suzuki T. Total pancreatic duct drainage for leakproof pancreatojejunostomy. Surgery 1994:115:22–26PubMed Hamanaka Y, Suzuki T. Total pancreatic duct drainage for leakproof pancreatojejunostomy. Surgery 1994:115:22–26PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mok KT, Wong BW, Liu SI. Management of pancreatic remnant with strategies according to the size of pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1018–1019PubMedCrossRef Mok KT, Wong BW, Liu SI. Management of pancreatic remnant with strategies according to the size of pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1018–1019PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roder JD, Stein HJ, Böttcher KA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective study. Ann Surg 1999;229:41–48PubMedCrossRef Roder JD, Stein HJ, Böttcher KA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective study. Ann Surg 1999;229:41–48PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gundry SR, Strodel WE, Knol JA, et al. Efficacy of preoperative biliary tract decompression in patients with obstructive jaundice. Arch Surg 1984;153:665–668 Gundry SR, Strodel WE, Knol JA, et al. Efficacy of preoperative biliary tract decompression in patients with obstructive jaundice. Arch Surg 1984;153:665–668
19.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ, van de Heyde MN, Lubbers MJ. Evaluation of preoperative biliary drainage in the surgical management of pancreatic head carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1987;153:665–668PubMed Lygidakis NJ, van de Heyde MN, Lubbers MJ. Evaluation of preoperative biliary drainage in the surgical management of pancreatic head carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1987;153:665–668PubMed
20.
go back to reference Povoski SP, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, et al. Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:131–142PubMedCrossRef Povoski SP, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, et al. Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:131–142PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hodul P, Creech S, Pickleman J, et al. The effect of preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2003;186:420–425PubMedCrossRef Hodul P, Creech S, Pickleman J, et al. The effect of preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2003;186:420–425PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Jejunal and Biliary Decompression on Postoperative Complications and Pancreatic Leakage Arising from Pancreatojejunostomy after Pancreatoduodenectomy
Authors
Yoichi Ishizaki, MD
Jiro Yoshimoto, MD
Hiroyuki Sugo, MD
Ken Miwa, MD
Seiji Kawasaki, MD
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0475-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

World Journal of Surgery 11/2006 Go to the issue