Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2006

01-01-2006

Anticipated Detection of Imminent Surgeon–Patient Barrier Breaches. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using an Indicator Underglove System

Authors: Jean-Louis Caillot, MD, PhD, Philippe Paparel, MD, MSc, Eric Arnal, MD, Vincent Schreiber, MD, Eric J. Voiglio, MD, PhD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The double gloving indicator underglove system (IUS) is based on a colored detection of the outer glove perforation. Our objective was to determine the IUS efficiency to detect outer glove perforations and to reduce the risks of blood and body fluids exposure, warning the surgeon before the breach of the surgeon–patient barrier (SPB). A series of 100 visceral surgical procedures were randomly assigned to either double (IUS) or single gloving. The noticed glove perforations (using the water test method) and the IUS efficiency were analyzed in 99 procedures. In 49 single-gloving procedures, 19 perforations were noticed: one was immediately perceived (perceived accidental exposure, PAE); 3 were discovered as the gloves were being removed, and 15 were undetected before the water test (unperceived prolonged contact, UPC). In 50 double-gloving procedures (IUS), 16 perforations were noticed, all of them involving only the outer glove: the IUS allowed immediate detection of 3 perforations without any blood exposure; 13 other perforations went undetected but without any UPC. In conjunction with the protective quality of double gloving, the IUS allows detection of significant breaches of the outer glove before the breach of the SPB.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;3: CD003087 Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;3: CD003087
2.
go back to reference Caillot JL, Voiglio EJ, Gilly FN, et al. The occupational viral risk run by French surgeons: a disturbing perspective. AIDS 2000;14:2061–2062PubMed Caillot JL, Voiglio EJ, Gilly FN, et al. The occupational viral risk run by French surgeons: a disturbing perspective. AIDS 2000;14:2061–2062PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hentz VR, Stephanides M, Boraldi A, et al. Surgeon–patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings. World J Surg 2001;25:1101–1108PubMed Hentz VR, Stephanides M, Boraldi A, et al. Surgeon–patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings. World J Surg 2001;25:1101–1108PubMed
4.
go back to reference Caillot JL, Cote C, Abidi H, et al. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving. Br J Surg 1999;86:1387–1390PubMedCrossRef Caillot JL, Cote C, Abidi H, et al. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving. Br J Surg 1999;86:1387–1390PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caillot JL, Cote C, Voiglio E, et al. Inadvertent prolonged fluid contact: an unappreciated professional risk for surgeons. Eur J Epidemiol 2000;16:687PubMedCrossRef Caillot JL, Cote C, Voiglio E, et al. Inadvertent prolonged fluid contact: an unappreciated professional risk for surgeons. Eur J Epidemiol 2000;16:687PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Wadhwa L, et al. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:319–322PubMedCrossRef Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Wadhwa L, et al. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:319–322PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Thanni LO, Yinusa W. Incidence of glove failure during orthopedic operations and the protective effect of double gloves. J Natl Med Assoc 2003;95:1184–1188PubMed Thanni LO, Yinusa W. Incidence of glove failure during orthopedic operations and the protective effect of double gloves. J Natl Med Assoc 2003;95:1184–1188PubMed
8.
go back to reference Caillot JL, Cote C, Lemaire C, et al. Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon–patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery. Ann Chir 2000;125:358–362PubMedCrossRef Caillot JL, Cote C, Lemaire C, et al. Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon–patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery. Ann Chir 2000;125:358–362PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wigmore SJ, Rainey JB. Use of coloured undergloves to detect glove breach. Br J Surg 1994;81:1480PubMed Wigmore SJ, Rainey JB. Use of coloured undergloves to detect glove breach. Br J Surg 1994;81:1480PubMed
10.
go back to reference Duron JJ, Keilani K, Elian NG. Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations. Eur J Surg 1996;162:941–944PubMed Duron JJ, Keilani K, Elian NG. Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations. Eur J Surg 1996;162:941–944PubMed
11.
go back to reference European Committee for Standardization. Medical gloves for single use. Part 1: requirements for testing for freedom from holes. EN 455-1:1993E European Committee for Standardization. Medical gloves for single use. Part 1: requirements for testing for freedom from holes. EN 455-1:1993E
12.
go back to reference Kovavisarach E, Seedadee C. Randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single and double-gloving methods in gynaecologic surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:519–521PubMed Kovavisarach E, Seedadee C. Randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single and double-gloving methods in gynaecologic surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:519–521PubMed
13.
go back to reference Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:898–900PubMedCrossRef Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:898–900PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Edlich RF, Wind TC, Heather CL, et al. Ease of donning of new powder-free non-latex and latex double-glove hole breach indication systems. J Long Term Effects Med Implants 2003;13:91–96 Edlich RF, Wind TC, Heather CL, et al. Ease of donning of new powder-free non-latex and latex double-glove hole breach indication systems. J Long Term Effects Med Implants 2003;13:91–96
15.
go back to reference Johanet H, Antona D, Bouvet E. Risks of accidental exposure to blood in the operating room. Results of a multicenter prospective study. Groupe d’Etude sur les Risques d’Exposition au Sang. Ann Chir 1995;49:403–410PubMed Johanet H, Antona D, Bouvet E. Risks of accidental exposure to blood in the operating room. Results of a multicenter prospective study. Groupe d’Etude sur les Risques d’Exposition au Sang. Ann Chir 1995;49:403–410PubMed
16.
go back to reference Laine T, Kaipia A, Santavirta J, et al. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg 2004;93:73–76PubMed Laine T, Kaipia A, Santavirta J, et al. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg 2004;93:73–76PubMed
17.
go back to reference Barbosa MV, Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, et al. Risk of glove perforation in minor and major plastic surgery procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27:481–484PubMedCrossRef Barbosa MV, Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, et al. Risk of glove perforation in minor and major plastic surgery procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27:481–484PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Naver LP, Gottrup F. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:293–295PubMed Naver LP, Gottrup F. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:293–295PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hentz RV, Traina GC, Cadossi R, et al. The protective efficacy of surgical latex gloves against the risk of skin contamination: how well are the operators protected? J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:825–832PubMedCrossRef Hentz RV, Traina GC, Cadossi R, et al. The protective efficacy of surgical latex gloves against the risk of skin contamination: how well are the operators protected? J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:825–832PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anticipated Detection of Imminent Surgeon–Patient Barrier Breaches. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using an Indicator Underglove System
Authors
Jean-Louis Caillot, MD, PhD
Philippe Paparel, MD, MSc
Eric Arnal, MD
Vincent Schreiber, MD
Eric J. Voiglio, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0172-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

World Journal of Surgery 1/2006 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor