Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Anthropometric Aspects in the Breast Augmentation

Authors: Luiz Charles-de-Sá, Thiago de Aguiar Valladão, Diogo Maciel Lobão Vieira, José Horácio Aboudib

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Studies have demonstrated the importance of anthropometric measurements of the breasts, based on linear measurements for the selection of the volume of breast implants, their positioning, and surgical planning.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to evaluate the main changes in anthropometric measurements in breast augmentation.

Methods

A prospective, randomized clinical study with 74 female candidates for breast augmentation. All the individuals were split into five groups, according to the implant volume. The implants used were of different textures, from three different brands (LifeSil, Politech, and Silimed). The following measures were taken: distance from the nipple to the inframammary fold (N-IMF), inter-nipple-areolar complex distance (N-N), distance from the Sternal notch to the Nipple (SN-N), areola diameter, and breast projection.

Results

The most significant breast anthropometric alteration after mammoplasty was the N-IMF distance; that is, an expansion of the lower pole of the breast, followed by an increase in the areolar diameter. Mostly of measurements showed stability between 3rd and 6th months after the surgery. The projection was the most interesting measure due to presenting two patterns of behavior according to the analysis criteria performed. When comparing the implant projection and the final breast projection, it was observed that the implant profile represented a 27% increase in the final breast projection.

Conclusions

This study provides an essential comparative analysis between anthropometric changes in breast augmentations and serves as a predictive tool in the preoperative evaluation of the patient during surgical planning.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fiala TGS, Lee WPA, May JW (1993) Augmentation mamoplasty: results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 30(6):503CrossRef Fiala TGS, Lee WPA, May JW (1993) Augmentation mamoplasty: results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 30(6):503CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, Overton J, Gravante G (2009) Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1808–1819CrossRef Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, Overton J, Gravante G (2009) Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1808–1819CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee HK, Jin US, Lee YH (2011) Subpectoral and precapsular implant repositioning technique: correction of capsular contracture and implant malposition. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:1126–1132CrossRef Lee HK, Jin US, Lee YH (2011) Subpectoral and precapsular implant repositioning technique: correction of capsular contracture and implant malposition. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:1126–1132CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767; discussion 768–772. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767; discussion 768–772.
7.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2004) "Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1258–1262CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2004) "Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1258–1262CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Freeman BS (1972) Successful treatment of some fibrous envelope contractures around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 50:107–113CrossRef Freeman BS (1972) Successful treatment of some fibrous envelope contractures around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 50:107–113CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hipps CJ, Raju R, Straith RE (1978) Influence of some operative and post-operative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:384–389CrossRef Hipps CJ, Raju R, Straith RE (1978) Influence of some operative and post-operative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:384–389CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sugimoto T (1982) Open capsulotomy for capsular contracture: a new procedure for the prevention of recurrence. Aesthetic Plast Surg 6:225–230CrossRef Sugimoto T (1982) Open capsulotomy for capsular contracture: a new procedure for the prevention of recurrence. Aesthetic Plast Surg 6:225–230CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dimensional surface imaging in plastic surgery: foundation, practical applications, and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRef Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dimensional surface imaging in plastic surgery: foundation, practical applications, and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP (2011) Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2441–2450CrossRef Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP (2011) Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2441–2450CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khouri R, Del Vecchio D (2009) Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. ClinPlast Surg. 36:269–280 Khouri R, Del Vecchio D (2009) Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. ClinPlast Surg. 36:269–280
14.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WPA (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7):2005–2016PubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WPA (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7):2005–2016PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hidalgo DA, Sinno S (2016) Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1142CrossRef Hidalgo DA, Sinno S (2016) Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1142CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2010) Preoperativee sizing in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1781–1787CrossRef Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2010) Preoperativee sizing in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1781–1787CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bayram Y, Zor F, Karagoz H, Kulahci Y, Afifi AM, Ozturk S (2016) Challenging breast augmentations: the influence ofpreoperativee anatomical featureson the final result. Aesthet Surg J 36:313–320CrossRef Bayram Y, Zor F, Karagoz H, Kulahci Y, Afifi AM, Ozturk S (2016) Challenging breast augmentations: the influence ofpreoperativee anatomical featureson the final result. Aesthet Surg J 36:313–320CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hedén P (2011) Breast augmentation with anatomic, high-cohesiveness silicone gel implants (European experience). In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and Art, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1322–1345 Hedén P (2011) Breast augmentation with anatomic, high-cohesiveness silicone gel implants (European experience). In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and Art, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1322–1345
19.
go back to reference Schwartz MR (2014) Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra's silicone gel shaped implants in primary and revision breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(Suppl):18S–27SCrossRef Schwartz MR (2014) Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra's silicone gel shaped implants in primary and revision breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(Suppl):18S–27SCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Somogyi RB, Brown MH (2015) Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon's review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:87–97CrossRef Somogyi RB, Brown MH (2015) Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon's review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:87–97CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1728–1737CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1728–1737CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479CrossRef Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boot JC, Naftel AJ, Ramli AR (1992) Bodymap: an image processing system for the measurement of body surface profiles encountered in skin expansion surgery. Int J Bio-Med Comp 31:189CrossRef Boot JC, Naftel AJ, Ramli AR (1992) Bodymap: an image processing system for the measurement of body surface profiles encountered in skin expansion surgery. Int J Bio-Med Comp 31:189CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Papadopulos NA et al (2004) Re: Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 53:192 [PubMed: 15269594]CrossRef Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Papadopulos NA et al (2004) Re: Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 53:192 [PubMed: 15269594]CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Malata CM, Boot JC, Bradbury ET et al (1994) Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. Br J Plast Surg 47:95CrossRef Malata CM, Boot JC, Bradbury ET et al (1994) Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. Br J Plast Surg 47:95CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M et al (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58CrossRef Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M et al (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE Jr et al (1987) Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:553CrossRef Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE Jr et al (1987) Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:553CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Charles-de-Sá L et al (2019) Perfil da cirurgia de aumento de mama no Brasil. Rev Bras Cir Plást 34(2):174–186 Charles-de-Sá L et al (2019) Perfil da cirurgia de aumento de mama no Brasil. Rev Bras Cir Plást 34(2):174–186
29.
go back to reference Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1988) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82(4):644–652CrossRef Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1988) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82(4):644–652CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Erdogan B, Ayhan M, Deren O, Tuncel A (2002) Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26(6):436–443CrossRef Erdogan B, Ayhan M, Deren O, Tuncel A (2002) Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26(6):436–443CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pérez-Macias JM (2007) Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control after reduction mammaplasty using the hammock technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(3):266–274CrossRef Pérez-Macias JM (2007) Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control after reduction mammaplasty using the hammock technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(3):266–274CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hammond DC, Hidalgo D, Slavin S, Spear S, Tebbetts J (1999) Revising the unsatisfactory breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(1):277–283CrossRef Hammond DC, Hidalgo D, Slavin S, Spear S, Tebbetts J (1999) Revising the unsatisfactory breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(1):277–283CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091CrossRef Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Roxo ACW, Nahas FX, Bazi F, de Castro CC, Aboudib JH, Marques RG (2015) Evaluation of the effects of silicone implants on the breast parench. Aesthetic Surg J 35(8):929–935CrossRef Roxo ACW, Nahas FX, Bazi F, de Castro CC, Aboudib JH, Marques RG (2015) Evaluation of the effects of silicone implants on the breast parench. Aesthetic Surg J 35(8):929–935CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ruiz J, Cabo F, Manzano M, Sajvador L (2019) Effects of silicone implants on the mammary gland: ultrasonographic and 3D study. Aesth Plast Surg 43(2):354–365CrossRef Ruiz J, Cabo F, Manzano M, Sajvador L (2019) Effects of silicone implants on the mammary gland: ultrasonographic and 3D study. Aesth Plast Surg 43(2):354–365CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Forte AJ, Barbosa MP, Persing JA, Alonso N, Berlin N, Broer N, Narayan D, Kwei S (2015) Cadaveric study of breast measurements during augmentation with implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(4):699e–710eCrossRef Forte AJ, Barbosa MP, Persing JA, Alonso N, Berlin N, Broer N, Narayan D, Kwei S (2015) Cadaveric study of breast measurements during augmentation with implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(4):699e–710eCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anthropometric Aspects in the Breast Augmentation
Authors
Luiz Charles-de-Sá
Thiago de Aguiar Valladão
Diogo Maciel Lobão Vieira
José Horácio Aboudib
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01853-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue