Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012

01-04-2012 | Innovative Techniques

Simultaneous Augmentation Mastopexy: A Technique for Maximum En Bloc Skin Resection Using the Inverted-T Pattern Regardless of Implant Size, Asymmetry, or Ptosis

Author: Ted Eisenberg

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy for moderately to severely ptotic breasts presents the challenge of determining how much excess skin should be removed after implant placement to create symmetry and provide for maximal skin tightening without compromising tissue vascularization.

Methods

Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy involves invagination and tailor tacking of the excess skin after implant placement and then making a pattern around the tailor-tacked tissues for previsualization of the total area to be resected. This contrasts with first making a pattern for the mastopexy, resecting the skin, and then tailor tacking the tissues together. Over a 7-year period, 55 women had simultaneous augmentation mastopexy with this approach. Saline implants were placed in the subpectoral dual-plane position before the mastopexy was started. All surgeries were performed with the patient under general anesthesia, and the patients were discharged the same day. In a retrospective chart review, breast implant size, degree of preoperative asymmetry, length of procedure, and complications were recorded. The patient follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 7 years (median, 9 months).

Results

Symmetric, aesthetic results were achieved for all the patients. The range of saline implants used was 375–775 ml (average, 500 ml). Of the 55 women, 15 had two different size implants measuring at least 50 ml or larger, with the greatest size disparity in a patient being 225 ml (left breast, 700 ml; right breast, 475 ml). Six of the patients (10.9%) had small areas that healed by secondary intention, occurring mostly at the inferior junction of the inverted T. Only two patients (3.6%) had recurrence of breast ptosis, and only one patient (1.8%) had a mildly hypertrophic scar. There were no incidences of hematoma, infection, rippling, malposition of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC), NAC loss, capsular contraction, implant malposition, or dissatisfaction with implant size. The bilateral augmentation/mastopexy surgery time ranged from 2 h and 29 min to 4 h and 30 min (average, 3 h and 8 min).

Conclusions

The described technique maximizes the amount of tissue to be resected in simultaneous augmentation mastopexy for moderately to severely ptotic breasts. Symmetry is more easily achieved with this approach regardless of the implant size used or the amount of skin to be resected. This technique minimizes the chance of tissue necrosis from devascularized skin edges. It also may shorten the inverted T scar and reduce the operative time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cardenas-Camarena L, Ramirez-Macias R (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:21–33CrossRef Cardenas-Camarena L, Ramirez-Macias R (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:21–33CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Iwuagwu OC, Drew PJ (2005) Deskinning versus deepithelialization for inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a prospective comparative analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:202–204CrossRef Iwuagwu OC, Drew PJ (2005) Deskinning versus deepithelialization for inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a prospective comparative analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:202–204CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Karacaoglu E (2009) Single-stage augmentation mastopexy: a novel technique using autologous dermal graft. Ann Plast Surg 63:600–604PubMedCrossRef Karacaoglu E (2009) Single-stage augmentation mastopexy: a novel technique using autologous dermal graft. Ann Plast Surg 63:600–604PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kirwan L (2007) Breast autoaugmentation. Can J Plast Surg 15:73–76PubMed Kirwan L (2007) Breast autoaugmentation. Can J Plast Surg 15:73–76PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kroll SS (1988) A comparison of deepithelialization and deskinning in inferior pedicle breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:913–916PubMedCrossRef Kroll SS (1988) A comparison of deepithelialization and deskinning in inferior pedicle breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:913–916PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marchac D (1990) Reduction mammoplasty with a short horizontal scar. In: Goldwyn R (ed) Reduction mammaplasty. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 317–336 Marchac D (1990) Reduction mammoplasty with a short horizontal scar. In: Goldwyn R (ed) Reduction mammaplasty. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 317–336
7.
go back to reference Parsa AA, Jackowe DJ (2010) A new algorithim for breast mastopexy/augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:75e–77ePubMedCrossRef Parsa AA, Jackowe DJ (2010) A new algorithim for breast mastopexy/augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:75e–77ePubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pinsky MA (2005) Radial plication in concentric mastopexy. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:391–399CrossRef Pinsky MA (2005) Radial plication in concentric mastopexy. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:391–399CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined generation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31–37PubMedCrossRef Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined generation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31–37PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:93 Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:93
11.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Reisch J (2006) Mastopexy preferences: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1631–1638PubMedCrossRef Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Reisch J (2006) Mastopexy preferences: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1631–1638PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Spear SL, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Augmentation mastopexy. Clin Plastic Surg 36:105–115CrossRef Spear SL, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Augmentation mastopexy. Clin Plastic Surg 36:105–115CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spear SL, Giese SY (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 20:155–164CrossRef Spear SL, Giese SY (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 20:155–164CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–681PubMedCrossRef Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–681PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stevens WG, Freeman ME, Stoker DA, Quardt SM, Cohen R, Hirsch EM (2007) One-stage mastopexy with breast augmentation: a review of 321 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1674–1679PubMedCrossRef Stevens WG, Freeman ME, Stoker DA, Quardt SM, Cohen R, Hirsch EM (2007) One-stage mastopexy with breast augmentation: a review of 321 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1674–1679PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1277PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1277PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wise RJ, Ganon JP, Hill JR (1963) Further experience with reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:12PubMedCrossRef Wise RJ, Ganon JP, Hill JR (1963) Further experience with reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:12PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Simultaneous Augmentation Mastopexy: A Technique for Maximum En Bloc Skin Resection Using the Inverted-T Pattern Regardless of Implant Size, Asymmetry, or Ptosis
Author
Ted Eisenberg
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9796-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012 Go to the issue