Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

Intraoperative Assessment of the Umbilicopubic Distance: A Reliable Anatomic Landmark for Transposition of the Umbilicus

Authors: J. R. Rodriguez-Feliz, Sumeet Makhijani, Adrian Przybyla, David Hill, Jerome Chao

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A clear understanding of the anatomic location and the aesthetic traits of the umbilicus is essential for the plastic surgeon repositioning the umbilicus during an abdominoplasty. Currently no consensus exists regarding the ideal location for this unique aesthetic unit of the abdomen. To their interest, the authors noted that the intraoperative distance from the pubic symphysis to midumbilical stalk measured 15 cm for several consecutive patients. They believe the umbilicopubic distance is another clinically useful and reliable anatomic landmark for the plastic surgeon relocating the umbilicus during an abdominoplasty.

Methods

A retrospective chart review analysis was performed for 40 consecutive patients who underwent abdominoplasty or panniculectomy between July 2009 and May 2010 at the authors’ institution. The intraoperative measurement of the umbilicopubic distance (pubic symphysis to midumbilical stalk) was available for 32 of these patients. The average umbilicopubic distance was calculated. Two separate graphs were generated to evaluate the relationship of the umbilicopubic distance to the patients’ height and body mass index (BMI). The data were saved and analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel.

Results

In the study population, the average intraoperative umbilicopubic distance was found to be 15.05 cm. The results validate the mean umbilicopubic distance of 15.04 cm reported by Dubou and colleagues in 1978. For patients whose stature fell between 145 and 178 cm, the umbilicopubic distance was consistently 15 cm. A tendency toward a higher umbilicus was noted as the patients became taller. The BMI did not seem to influence the location of the umbilicus as measured intraoperatively.

Conclusion

Translocation of the umbilicus to 15 cm from the pubic symphysis in patients with a stature of 145–178 cm is another clinically useful, safe, and expeditious method for relocation of the umbilicus during an abdominoplasty.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
go back to reference Vernon S (1957) Umbilical transplantation upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J Surg 94:490–492PubMedCrossRef Vernon S (1957) Umbilical transplantation upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J Surg 94:490–492PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Akbas H, Guneren E, Eroglu L, Uysal OA (2003) Natural looking umbilicus as an important part of abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:139–142CrossRef Akbas H, Guneren E, Eroglu L, Uysal OA (2003) Natural looking umbilicus as an important part of abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:139–142CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL (2000) In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:389–392PubMedCrossRef Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL (2000) In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:389–392PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rozen SM, Redett R (2007) The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:2255–2262PubMedCrossRef Rozen SM, Redett R (2007) The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:2255–2262PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Gibby DL (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:259–263PubMedCrossRef Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Gibby DL (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:259–263PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grant B (1965) Grant’s method of anatomy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore Grant B (1965) Grant’s method of anatomy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
9.
go back to reference Gray H (1977) Gray’s anatomy of the human body. Grammercy Books, New York Gray H (1977) Gray’s anatomy of the human body. Grammercy Books, New York
10.
go back to reference Hinderer UT (1975) The dermolipectomy approach for augmentation mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2:359–369PubMed Hinderer UT (1975) The dermolipectomy approach for augmentation mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2:359–369PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dubou R, Ousternhout DK (1978) Placement of umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:291–293PubMedCrossRef Dubou R, Ousternhout DK (1978) Placement of umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:291–293PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA (2006) Anatomical location of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1153–1157PubMedCrossRef Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA (2006) Anatomical location of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1153–1157PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baroudi R, Keppke EM, Netto FT (1974) Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:161–168PubMed Baroudi R, Keppke EM, Netto FT (1974) Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:161–168PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Mustoe TA (2002) Simplified technique for creating a youthful umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2136–2140PubMedCrossRef Lee MJ, Mustoe TA (2002) Simplified technique for creating a youthful umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2136–2140PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Niranjan NS, Staiano JJ (2004) An anatomical method of re-siting the umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2194–2198PubMedCrossRef Niranjan NS, Staiano JJ (2004) An anatomical method of re-siting the umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2194–2198PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Huger WE (1989) Wedge abdominoplasty: avoiding tissue slough. In: Levis JR Jr (ed) The art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Little, Brown, Boston Huger WE (1989) Wedge abdominoplasty: avoiding tissue slough. In: Levis JR Jr (ed) The art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Little, Brown, Boston
20.
go back to reference Hoffman S (1989) A simple technique for locating the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reonstr Surg 83:537–538CrossRef Hoffman S (1989) A simple technique for locating the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reonstr Surg 83:537–538CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kurul S, Uzunismail A (1997) A simple technique to determine future location of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:753–754PubMed Kurul S, Uzunismail A (1997) A simple technique to determine future location of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:753–754PubMed
22.
go back to reference Shoukas J, Christopoulos N, Kouris G, Polley JW (2009) Umbilical quest: a new technique for accurately identifying the new position of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty using a lockwood marker. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:120e–121ePubMedCrossRef Shoukas J, Christopoulos N, Kouris G, Polley JW (2009) Umbilical quest: a new technique for accurately identifying the new position of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty using a lockwood marker. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:120e–121ePubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intraoperative Assessment of the Umbilicopubic Distance: A Reliable Anatomic Landmark for Transposition of the Umbilicus
Authors
J. R. Rodriguez-Feliz
Sumeet Makhijani
Adrian Przybyla
David Hill
Jerome Chao
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9748-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012 Go to the issue