Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Article

Males Prefer a Larger Bust Size in Women Than Females Themselves: An Experimental Study on Female Bodily Attractiveness with Varying Weight, Bust Size, Waist Width, Hip Width, and Leg Length Independently

Authors: Lukas Prantl, Martin Gründl

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

What determines a female figure as attractive and is there a consensus of both sexes in judging female bodily attractiveness? To answer these questions, an extensive experiment was conducted using high-quality photographic stimulus material, several systematically varied figure parameters (weight, hip width, waist width, bust size, and leg length), and a large sample of 34,000 participants. The results showed that women prefer slightly wider hips, a narrower waist, and longer legs than men (highly significant but small effects). A clear difference was found with regard to the ideal bust size: 40% of men but only 25% of women preferred a large bust. The findings are discussed with respect to the changed role of women in Western industrialized countries who tend to concentrate on their career rather than on reproduction, and the effect of a curvaceous body with a large-sized bust on social perception.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barber N (1995) The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol Sociobiol 16:395–424CrossRef Barber N (1995) The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol Sociobiol 16:395–424CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buss DM (1995) Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychol Inquiry 6:1–30CrossRef Buss DM (1995) Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychol Inquiry 6:1–30CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Buss DM (2007) The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica 39:502–512 Buss DM (2007) The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica 39:502–512
4.
go back to reference Singh D, Luis S (1994) Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of WHR on judgment of women’s attractiveness. Hum Nat 6:51–65CrossRef Singh D, Luis S (1994) Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of WHR on judgment of women’s attractiveness. Hum Nat 6:51–65CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100:204–232PubMedCrossRef Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100:204–232PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weeden J, Sabini J (2005) Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychol Bull 131:635–653PubMedCrossRef Weeden J, Sabini J (2005) Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychol Bull 131:635–653PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rhodes G (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Ann Rev Psychol 57:199–226CrossRef Rhodes G (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Ann Rev Psychol 57:199–226CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2006) Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Hum Behav 27:131–144CrossRef Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2006) Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Hum Behav 27:131–144CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC (1992) Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. Maturitas 15:261–262 Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC (1992) Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. Maturitas 15:261–262
11.
go back to reference Rebuffe-Scrive M (1988) Metabolic differences in fat deposits. In: Bouchard C, Johnston FE (eds) Fat distribution during growth and later health outcome. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 163–173 Rebuffe-Scrive M (1988) Metabolic differences in fat deposits. In: Bouchard C, Johnston FE (eds) Fat distribution during growth and later health outcome. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 163–173
12.
go back to reference de-Ridder CM, Bruning PF, Zonderland ML, Thijssen JH, Bonfrer JM, Blankenstein MA, Huisveld IA, Erich WB (1990) Body fat mass, body fat distribution, and plasma hormones in early puberty in females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:888–893PubMedCrossRef de-Ridder CM, Bruning PF, Zonderland ML, Thijssen JH, Bonfrer JM, Blankenstein MA, Huisveld IA, Erich WB (1990) Body fat mass, body fat distribution, and plasma hormones in early puberty in females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:888–893PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van-Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J (1993) Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ 306:484–487PubMedCrossRef Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van-Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J (1993) Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ 306:484–487PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Furnham A, Lavanchy M, McClelland A (2001) Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: a pilot study. Pers Indiv Differ 30:491–502CrossRef Furnham A, Lavanchy M, McClelland A (2001) Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: a pilot study. Pers Indiv Differ 30:491–502CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Furnham A, Tan T, McManus C (1997) Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Pers Indiv Differ 22:539–549CrossRef Furnham A, Tan T, McManus C (1997) Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Pers Indiv Differ 22:539–549CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Henss R (1995) Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Pers Indiv Differ 19:479–488CrossRef Henss R (1995) Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Pers Indiv Differ 19:479–488CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Henss R (2000) Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Pers Indiv Differ 28:501–513CrossRef Henss R (2000) Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Pers Indiv Differ 28:501–513CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singh D (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:293–307PubMedCrossRef Singh D (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:293–307PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Singh D (1993) Body shape and women’s attractiveness: the critical role of waist-hip ratio. Hum Nat 4:297–321CrossRef Singh D (1993) Body shape and women’s attractiveness: the critical role of waist-hip ratio. Hum Nat 4:297–321CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Singh D (1994) Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Pers Indiv Differ 16:123–132CrossRef Singh D (1994) Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Pers Indiv Differ 16:123–132CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Singh D (1994) Waist-to-hip ratio and judgments of attractiveness and healthiness by male and female physicians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18:731–737PubMed Singh D (1994) Waist-to-hip ratio and judgments of attractiveness and healthiness by male and female physicians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18:731–737PubMed
22.
go back to reference Singh D (1994) Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women. Int J Eat Disord 16:289–294PubMedCrossRef Singh D (1994) Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women. Int J Eat Disord 16:289–294PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Singh D (1995) Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethol Sociobiol 16:465–481CrossRef Singh D (1995) Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethol Sociobiol 16:465–481CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Singh D, Young R (1995) Body weight, WHR, breasts and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol Sociobiol 16:483–507CrossRef Singh D, Young R (1995) Body weight, WHR, breasts and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol Sociobiol 16:483–507CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Streeter SA, McBurney DH (2003) Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of “a critical test”. Evol Hum Behav 24:88–98CrossRef Streeter SA, McBurney DH (2003) Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of “a critical test”. Evol Hum Behav 24:88–98CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Furnham A, Petrides KV, Constantinides A (2005) The effects of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on ratings of female attractiveness, fecundity, and health. Pers Indiv Differ 38:1823–1834CrossRef Furnham A, Petrides KV, Constantinides A (2005) The effects of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on ratings of female attractiveness, fecundity, and health. Pers Indiv Differ 38:1823–1834CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johnson KL, Tassinary LG (2007) Interpersonal metaperception: the importance of compatibility in the aesthetic appreciation of bodily cues. In: Swami V, Furnham AF (eds) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London Johnson KL, Tassinary LG (2007) Interpersonal metaperception: the importance of compatibility in the aesthetic appreciation of bodily cues. In: Swami V, Furnham AF (eds) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London
28.
go back to reference Swami V (2007) The missing arms of Vénus de Milo: reflections on the science of physical attractiveness. The Book Guild, Brighton Swami V (2007) The missing arms of Vénus de Milo: reflections on the science of physical attractiveness. The Book Guild, Brighton
29.
go back to reference Swami V, Furnham A (2008) The psychology of physical attraction. Routledge, London Swami V, Furnham A (2008) The psychology of physical attraction. Routledge, London
30.
go back to reference Swami V, Furnham A (2007) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London Swami V, Furnham A (2007) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London
31.
go back to reference Furnham A, Reeves E (2006) The relative influence of facial neoteny and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and fecundity. Psychol Health Med 11:129–141PubMedCrossRef Furnham A, Reeves E (2006) The relative influence of facial neoteny and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and fecundity. Psychol Health Med 11:129–141PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tovée MJ, Maisey DS, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL (1999) Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proc Biol Sci 266:211–218PubMedCrossRef Tovée MJ, Maisey DS, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL (1999) Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proc Biol Sci 266:211–218PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tovée MJ, Mason SM, Emery JL, McCluskey SE, Cohen-Tovée EM (1997) Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses? Lancet 350:1474–1475PubMedCrossRef Tovée MJ, Mason SM, Emery JL, McCluskey SE, Cohen-Tovée EM (1997) Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses? Lancet 350:1474–1475PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL (1998) Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet 352:548–1242PubMedCrossRef Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL (1998) Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet 352:548–1242PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL (2001) Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. Br J Psychol 92:391–402CrossRef Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL (2001) Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. Br J Psychol 92:391–402CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Smith KL, Cornelissen PL, Tovee MJ (2007) Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 28:48–54CrossRef Smith KL, Cornelissen PL, Tovee MJ (2007) Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 28:48–54CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Sobal J, Stunkard AJ (1989) Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull 105:260–275PubMedCrossRef Sobal J, Stunkard AJ (1989) Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull 105:260–275PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Anderson JL, Crawford CB, Nadeau J, Lindberg T (1992) Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol 13:197–227CrossRef Anderson JL, Crawford CB, Nadeau J, Lindberg T (1992) Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol 13:197–227CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in women: Tests of a reproductive model. Int J Eat Disord 23:449–454PubMedCrossRef Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in women: Tests of a reproductive model. Int J Eat Disord 23:449–454PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals. J Psychol 132:87–94PubMedCrossRef Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals. J Psychol 132:87–94PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fisher ML, Voracek M (2006) The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. J Cosmet Dermatol 5:190–194PubMedCrossRef Fisher ML, Voracek M (2006) The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. J Cosmet Dermatol 5:190–194PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Silverstein B, Peterson B, Perdue L (1986) Some correlates of thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Int J Eat Disord 5:895–905CrossRef Silverstein B, Peterson B, Perdue L (1986) Some correlates of thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Int J Eat Disord 5:895–905CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Voracek M, Fisher ML (2002) Shapely centrefolds? temporal change in body measures: trend analysis. BMJ 325:1447–1448PubMedCrossRef Voracek M, Fisher ML (2002) Shapely centrefolds? temporal change in body measures: trend analysis. BMJ 325:1447–1448PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Voracek M, Fisher ML (2006) Success is all in the measures: androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Arch Sex Behav 35:297–304PubMedCrossRef Voracek M, Fisher ML (2006) Success is all in the measures: androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Arch Sex Behav 35:297–304PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I (2004) Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc Biol Sci 271:1213–1217PubMedCrossRef Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I (2004) Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc Biol Sci 271:1213–1217PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Smith GD, Greenwood R, Gunnell D, Sweetnam P, Yarnell J, Elwood P (2001) Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: the Caerphilly Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:867–872PubMedCrossRef Smith GD, Greenwood R, Gunnell D, Sweetnam P, Yarnell J, Elwood P (2001) Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: the Caerphilly Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:867–872PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Gunnell D, May M, Ben-Shlomo Y, Yarnell J, Smith GD (2003) Height, leg length, and cancer: the Caerphilly Study. Nutr Cancer 47:34–39PubMedCrossRef Gunnell D, May M, Ben-Shlomo Y, Yarnell J, Smith GD (2003) Height, leg length, and cancer: the Caerphilly Study. Nutr Cancer 47:34–39PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Gunnell D, Whitley E, Upton MN, McConnachie A, Smith GD, Watt GC (2003) Associations of height, leg length, and lung function with cardiovascular risk factors in the Midspan Family Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:141–146PubMedCrossRef Gunnell D, Whitley E, Upton MN, McConnachie A, Smith GD, Watt GC (2003) Associations of height, leg length, and lung function with cardiovascular risk factors in the Midspan Family Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:141–146PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Gunnell DJ, Davey-Smith G, Frankel S, Nanchahal K, Braddon FE, Pemberton J, Peters TJ (1998) Childhood leg length and adult mortality: follow up of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) Survey of Diet and Health in Pre-war Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:142–152PubMedCrossRef Gunnell DJ, Davey-Smith G, Frankel S, Nanchahal K, Braddon FE, Pemberton J, Peters TJ (1998) Childhood leg length and adult mortality: follow up of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) Survey of Diet and Health in Pre-war Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:142–152PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gunnell DJ, Smith GD, Holly JM, Frankel S (1998) Leg length and risk of cancer in the Boyd Orr cohort. BMJ 317:1350–1351PubMed Gunnell DJ, Smith GD, Holly JM, Frankel S (1998) Leg length and risk of cancer in the Boyd Orr cohort. BMJ 317:1350–1351PubMed
53.
go back to reference Langenberg C, Hardy R, Kuh D, Wadsworth ME (2003) Influence of height, leg and trunk length on pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. J Hypertens 21:537–543PubMedCrossRef Langenberg C, Hardy R, Kuh D, Wadsworth ME (2003) Influence of height, leg and trunk length on pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. J Hypertens 21:537–543PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Davey-Smith G (2002) The association between components of adult height and Type II diabetes and insulin resistance: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Diabetologia 45:1097–1106PubMedCrossRef Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Davey-Smith G (2002) The association between components of adult height and Type II diabetes and insulin resistance: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Diabetologia 45:1097–1106PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Morris D (1987) Bodywatching. Grafton Books, London Morris D (1987) Bodywatching. Grafton Books, London
56.
go back to reference Swami V, Einon D, Furnham A (2006) The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion. Body Image 3:317–323PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Einon D, Furnham A (2006) The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion. Body Image 3:317–323PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Allal N, Sear R, Prentice AM, Mace R (2004) An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women. Proc Biol Sci 271:465–470PubMedCrossRef Allal N, Sear R, Prentice AM, Mace R (2004) An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women. Proc Biol Sci 271:465–470PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Sorokowski P, Pawlowski B (2008) Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner. Evol Hum Behav 29:86–91CrossRef Sorokowski P, Pawlowski B (2008) Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner. Evol Hum Behav 29:86–91CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Buss DM (1992) Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 249–266 Buss DM (1992) Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 249–266
60.
go back to reference Fallon AE, Rozin P (1985) Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. J Abnorm Psychol 94:102–105PubMedCrossRef Fallon AE, Rozin P (1985) Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. J Abnorm Psychol 94:102–105PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Rozin P, Fallon A (1988) Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: a comparison of men and women in two generations. J Abnorm Psychol 97:342–345PubMedCrossRef Rozin P, Fallon A (1988) Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: a comparison of men and women in two generations. J Abnorm Psychol 97:342–345PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Gitter AG, Lomranz J, Saxe L, Bar-Tal Y (1983) Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. J Soc Psychol 121:7–13PubMedCrossRef Gitter AG, Lomranz J, Saxe L, Bar-Tal Y (1983) Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. J Soc Psychol 121:7–13PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Jones D (1997) An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evol Anthropol 5:97–109CrossRef Jones D (1997) An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evol Anthropol 5:97–109CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Tantleff-Dunn S (2001) Breast and chest size: ideals and stereotypes through the 1990 s. Sex Roles 45:231–242CrossRef Tantleff-Dunn S (2001) Breast and chest size: ideals and stereotypes through the 1990 s. Sex Roles 45:231–242CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Horvath T (1981) Physical attractiveness: the influence of selected torso parameters. Arch Sex Behav 10:21–24PubMedCrossRef Horvath T (1981) Physical attractiveness: the influence of selected torso parameters. Arch Sex Behav 10:21–24PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Furnham A, Hester C, Weir C (1990) Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes. Sex Roles 22:743–754CrossRef Furnham A, Hester C, Weir C (1990) Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes. Sex Roles 22:743–754CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Thompson JK, Tantleff S (1992) Female and male ratings of upper torso: actual, ideal, and sterotypical conceptions. J Soc Behav Pers 7:345–354 Thompson JK, Tantleff S (1992) Female and male ratings of upper torso: actual, ideal, and sterotypical conceptions. J Soc Behav Pers 7:345–354
68.
go back to reference Byrd-Bredbenner C, Murray J, Schlussel YR (2005) Temporal changes in anthropometric measurements of idealized females and young women in general. Women Health 41:13–30PubMedCrossRef Byrd-Bredbenner C, Murray J, Schlussel YR (2005) Temporal changes in anthropometric measurements of idealized females and young women in general. Women Health 41:13–30PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Grammer K (1995) Signale der Liebe. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München Grammer K (1995) Signale der Liebe. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München
70.
go back to reference Tovée MJ, Hancock PJB, Mahmoodi S, Singleton BR, Cornelissen PL (2002) Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape. Proc Biol Sci 269:2205–2213PubMedCrossRef Tovée MJ, Hancock PJB, Mahmoodi S, Singleton BR, Cornelissen PL (2002) Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape. Proc Biol Sci 269:2205–2213PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Pokrywka L, Cabrić M, Krakowiak H (2006) Body mass index and waist: hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness. Perception 35:1693–1697PubMedCrossRef Pokrywka L, Cabrić M, Krakowiak H (2006) Body mass index and waist: hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness. Perception 35:1693–1697PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Seifert T (2005) Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: trends towards slender figures over time. Int J Eat Disord 37:271–274PubMedCrossRef Seifert T (2005) Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: trends towards slender figures over time. Int J Eat Disord 37:271–274PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Furnham A, Dias M, McClelland A (1998) The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles 39:311–326CrossRef Furnham A, Dias M, McClelland A (1998) The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles 39:311–326CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Furnham A, Swami V (2007) Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behav Pers 35:1–8CrossRef Furnham A, Swami V (2007) Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behav Pers 35:1–8CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Tassinary LG, Hansen KA (1998) A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychol Sci 9:150–155CrossRef Tassinary LG, Hansen KA (1998) A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychol Sci 9:150–155CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Beck SB, Ward-Hull CI, McLear PM (1976) Variables related to women’s somatic preferences of the male and female body. J Pers Soc Psychol 34:1200–1210CrossRef Beck SB, Ward-Hull CI, McLear PM (1976) Variables related to women’s somatic preferences of the male and female body. J Pers Soc Psychol 34:1200–1210CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Wiggins JS, Wiggins N, Conger JC (1968) Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. J Pers Soc Psychol 10:82–90PubMedCrossRef Wiggins JS, Wiggins N, Conger JC (1968) Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. J Pers Soc Psychol 10:82–90PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Kleinke CL, Staneski RA (1980) First impressions of female bust size. J Soc Psychol 110:123–134CrossRef Kleinke CL, Staneski RA (1980) First impressions of female bust size. J Soc Psychol 110:123–134CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Tantleff-Dunn S (2002) Biggest isn’t always best: the effect of breast size on perceptions of women. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:2253–2265CrossRef Tantleff-Dunn S (2002) Biggest isn’t always best: the effect of breast size on perceptions of women. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:2253–2265CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Silverstein B, Perdue L, Peterson B, Vogel L, Fantini DA (1986) Possible causes of the thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Int J Eat Disord 5:907–916CrossRef Silverstein B, Perdue L, Peterson B, Vogel L, Fantini DA (1986) Possible causes of the thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Int J Eat Disord 5:907–916CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Swami V, Jones J, Einon D, Furnham A (2009) Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. Br J Psychol 100:313–325PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Jones J, Einon D, Furnham A (2009) Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. Br J Psychol 100:313–325PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Swami V, Furnham A (2009) Big and beautiful: attractiveness and health ratings of the female body by male “fat admirers”. Arch Sex Behav 38:201–208PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Furnham A (2009) Big and beautiful: attractiveness and health ratings of the female body by male “fat admirers”. Arch Sex Behav 38:201–208PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Swami V, Knight D, Tovee MJ, Davies P, Furnham A (2007) Preferences for female body size in Britain and the South Pacific. Body Image 4:219–223PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Knight D, Tovee MJ, Davies P, Furnham A (2007) Preferences for female body size in Britain and the South Pacific. Body Image 4:219–223PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Swami V, Tovee MJ (2007) The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgements of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia. Body Image 4:391–396PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Tovee MJ (2007) The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgements of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia. Body Image 4:391–396PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Swami V, Einon D, Furnham A (2007) Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia. Asian J Soc Psychol 10:265–269CrossRef Swami V, Einon D, Furnham A (2007) Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia. Asian J Soc Psychol 10:265–269CrossRef
86.
go back to reference Swami V, Smith J, Tsiokris A, Georgiades C, Sangareau Y, Tovée MJ, Furnham A (2007) Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece: a cross-cultural study. J Soc Psychol 147:15–26PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Smith J, Tsiokris A, Georgiades C, Sangareau Y, Tovée MJ, Furnham A (2007) Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece: a cross-cultural study. J Soc Psychol 147:15–26PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Swami V, Tovee MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48:43–50PubMedCrossRef Swami V, Tovee MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48:43–50PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Tovee MJ, Swami V, Furnham A, Mangalparsad R (2006) Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol Hum Behav 27:443–456CrossRef Tovee MJ, Swami V, Furnham A, Mangalparsad R (2006) Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol Hum Behav 27:443–456CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Swami V, Antonakopoulos N, Tovee MJ, Furnham A (2006) A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles 54:201–211CrossRef Swami V, Antonakopoulos N, Tovee MJ, Furnham A (2006) A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles 54:201–211CrossRef
90.
go back to reference Swami V, Caprario C, Tovee MJ, Furnham A (2006) Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. Eur J Personality 20:69–81CrossRef Swami V, Caprario C, Tovee MJ, Furnham A (2006) Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. Eur J Personality 20:69–81CrossRef
91.
go back to reference Schaefer K, Fink B, Grammer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein FL (2006) Female appearance: facial and bodily attractiveness as shape. Psychol Sci 48:187–204 Schaefer K, Fink B, Grammer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein FL (2006) Female appearance: facial and bodily attractiveness as shape. Psychol Sci 48:187–204
Metadata
Title
Males Prefer a Larger Bust Size in Women Than Females Themselves: An Experimental Study on Female Bodily Attractiveness with Varying Weight, Bust Size, Waist Width, Hip Width, and Leg Length Independently
Authors
Lukas Prantl
Martin Gründl
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9669-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2011 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements