Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2004

01-04-2004

Augmentation Mammaplasty: Where Should the Implant Be Placed?

Authors: Susumu Takayanagi, M.D., Chisato Nakagawa, R.N., Yoko Sugimoto, M.D.

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Malposition of the prosthesis is one complication of augmentation mammaplasty. The most projected point of the prosthesis should be placed just behind the nipple to create a natural-looking breast. However, in some cases, when a textured surface cohesive silicone gel prosthesis with an inframammary approach is used, low displacement of the prosthesis is encountered within 1 year. This phenomenon can be seen both in subpectoral augmentation with severing of the muscle at the level of the inframammary fold and in subglandular augmentation when the patient’s breast and skin are very soft and easily stretchable. Therefore, the elasticity of the breast should be evaluated before surgery. If the patients breast and skin are very soft and easily stretchable, the pocket for the prosthesis should be created 1 to 1.5 cm superiorly to the usual pocket for the prosthesis. The design of the pocket for the prosthesis should be different depending on the shape of the prosthesis and the elasticity of the patient’s breasts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coleman, DJ, Foot, TH, Sharpe, DT 1991Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? A prospective control trialBr J Plas Surg44444 Coleman, DJ, Foot, TH, Sharpe, DT 1991Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? A prospective control trialBr J Plas Surg44444
2.
go back to reference Ersek, RA 1991Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: A comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prosthesesPlast Reconstr Surg87879PubMed Ersek, RA 1991Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: A comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prosthesesPlast Reconstr Surg87879PubMed
3.
go back to reference Heden, P, Jernbeck, J, Hober, M 2001Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implantsClin Plast Surg28531PubMed Heden, P, Jernbeck, J, Hober, M 2001Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implantsClin Plast Surg28531PubMed
4.
go back to reference Tebbetts, JB 1984Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Long-term follow-up and refinementsPlast Reconstr Surg74636PubMed Tebbetts, JB 1984Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Long-term follow-up and refinementsPlast Reconstr Surg74636PubMed
5.
go back to reference Troilous, C 1996Correction of implant ptosis after a transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentationPlast Reconstr Surg98889PubMed Troilous, C 1996Correction of implant ptosis after a transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentationPlast Reconstr Surg98889PubMed
6.
go back to reference Troilous, C 1995Total muscle coverage of a breast implant is possible through the transaxillary approachPlast Reconstr Surg95509PubMed Troilous, C 1995Total muscle coverage of a breast implant is possible through the transaxillary approachPlast Reconstr Surg95509PubMed
Metadata
Title
Augmentation Mammaplasty: Where Should the Implant Be Placed?
Authors
Susumu Takayanagi, M.D.
Chisato Nakagawa, R.N.
Yoko Sugimoto, M.D.
Publication date
01-04-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2004
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3118-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2004

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2004 Go to the issue