Top

Published in:

01-10-2018 | Review Article

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Mohammed Adam, Ahmed Khalil Attia, Abduljabbar Alhammoud, Osama Aldahamsheh, Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari, Ghalib Ahmed

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2018

Abstract

Background

The ideal treatment of acute anterior shoulder dislocation remains one of the topics that spark debate over the value of primary repair for the first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. The high rate of complications especially in young adults, such as recurrent instability, residual pain, and inability to return to sports, has led to the quest for an ideal management of such injuries.

Objective

In this meta-analysis, we compare between the immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Outcome measures were failure rate (dislocation, subluxation, and instability) and revision rates.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched several database including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2017 to identify observational and experimental randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary shoulder dislocations as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. The primary outcome was failure rate, whereas, secondary outcomes were revision rate and functional outcomes.

Results

Out of the 710 studies identified, 12 were eligible for meta-analysis. The estimated pooled failure rate was 13.7% (7.7%–19.6%), whereas, the pooled revision rate was 7.1% (3.8%–10.4%) in immediate arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation. The odd ratio (OR) of failure and revision rates were significantly lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to conservative treatment (OR 0.103, 95% CI [0.052, 0.201]), (OR 0.217, 95% CI [0.078, 0.607]), respectively. The odd ratio (OD) of failure and revision rates were lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of the recurrent shoulder dislocation; however, the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 0.423, 95% CI [0.117, 1.522]) and (OR 0.358, 95% CI [0.044, 2.920]) respectively.

Conclusion

The outcome of immediate arthroscopic repair of primary anterior shoulder dislocation is superior and encouraging with significant reduction in failure and revision rates compared to conservative treatment. Nevertheless, the failure and revision rates are statistically insignificant compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. Hence, there is evidence to support immediate arthroscopic repair option for primary anterior shoulder dislocations over conservative treatment in young active patients, in order to reduce the risk of failure and revision rates. However, the evidence is inconclusive compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation.

Hovelius L (1982) Incidence of shoulder dislocation in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 127–131

Kirkley A, Griffin S, Richards C et al (1999) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1053/ar.1999.v15.015050 CrossRefPubMed

Owens BD, Duffey ML, Nelson BJ et al (2007) The incidence and characteristics of shoulder instability at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med 35:1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506295179 CrossRefPubMed

Kirkley A, Werstine R, Ratjek A, Griffin S (2005) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder: long-term evaluation. Arthroscopy 21:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.018 CrossRefPubMed

Bottoni CR, Wilckens JH, DeBerardino TM et al (2002) A prospective, randomized evaluation of arthroscopic stabilization versus nonoperative treatment in patients with acute, traumatic, first-time shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med 30:576–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300041801 CrossRefPubMed

Arciero RA, Wheeler JH, Ryan JB, McBride JT (1994) Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute, initial anterior shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med 22:589–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659402200504 CrossRefPubMed

Chapus V, Rochcongar G, Pineau V et al (2015) Ten-year follow-up of acute arthroscopic Bankart repair for initial anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.029 CrossRefPubMed

Hovelius L, Saeboe M (2009) Neer Award 2008: Arthropathy after primary anterior shoulder dislocation--223 shoulders prospectively followed up for twenty-five years. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.004 CrossRef

Hovelius L, Olofsson A, Sandström B et al (2008) Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger. a prospective twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:945–952. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00070 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Rowe CR (1956) Prognosis in dislocations of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 38–A:957–977CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kordasiewicz B, Małachowski K, Kicinski M et al (2017) Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-clinical results at short term follow-up. Int Orthop 41:1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3372-3 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Sato T et al (2007) Immobilization in external rotation after shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2124–2131. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00654 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Porcellini G, Campi F, Pegreffi F et al (2009) Predisposing factors for recurrent shoulder dislocation after arthroscopic treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2537–2542. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01126 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dickens JF, Owens BD, Cameron KL et al (2014) Return to play and recurrent instability after in-season anterior shoulder instability: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 42:2842–2850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514553181 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Longo UG, van der Linde JA, Loppini M et al (2016) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment in patients up to 18 years old with traumatic shoulder instability: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. Arthroscopy 32:944–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.10.020 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging. Hill-Sachs lesion Arthroscopy 16:677–694CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rhee YG, Ha JH, Cho NS (2006) Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes: arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med 34:979–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505283267 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lenters TR, Franta AK, Wolf FM et al (2007) Arthroscopic compared with open repairs for recurrent anterior shoulder instability A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:244–254. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01139 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Marshall T, Vega J, Siqueira M et al (2017) Outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair: patients with first-time versus recurrent dislocations. Am J Sports Med 45:1776–1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517698692 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Robinson CM, Jenkins PJ, White TO et al (2008) Primary arthroscopic stabilization for a first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:708–721. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00679 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kim D-S, Yi C-H, Yoon Y-S (2011) Arthroscopic repair for combined Bankart and superior labral anterior posterior lesions: a comparative study between primary and recurrent anterior dislocation in the shoulder. Int Orthop 35:1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1229-3 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

22.

Nixon MF, Keenan O, Funk L (2015) High recurrence of instability in adolescents playing contact sports after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. J Pediatr Orthop B 24:173–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000135 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Gigis I, Heikenfeld R, Kapinas A et al (2014) Arthroscopic versus conservative treatment of first anterior dislocation of the shoulder in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 34:421–425. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000108 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Law BK-Y, Yung PS-H, Ho EP-Y et al (2008) The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:188–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0453-2 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Larrain MV, Botto GJ, Montenegro HJ, Mauas DM (2001) Arthroscopic repair of acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young athletes. Arthroscopy 17:373–377CrossRefPubMed

Title: Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Mohammed Adam
Ahmed Khalil Attia
Abduljabbar Alhammoud
Osama Aldahamsheh
Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
Ghalib Ahmed
Publication date: 01-10-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4046-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Single-stage treatment of infected tibial non-unions and osteomyelitis with bone marrow granulocytes precursors protecting bone graft

Comment on Cho et al.: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis

Total ankle replacement leads to high revision rates in post-traumatic end-stage arthrosis

Computed tomography of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures after distraction with a bridging external fixation

The Eden-Hybbinette procedure is one hundred years old! A historical view of the concept and its evolutions

Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view