Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Paper

Tight-fitting radial head prosthesis: does stem size help prevent painful loosening?

Authors: Pierre Laumonerie, Nicolas Reina, Claudia Gutierrez, Stephanie Delclaux, Meagan E. Tibbo, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Pierre Mansat

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The most common reason for removal of well-fixed radial head prostheses is painful loosening. We hypothesised that short-stemmed prostheses, used for radial head arthroplasty, are not associated with an increased risk of implant loosening.

Methods

From 2002 to 2014, 65 patients were enrolled in a retrospective single-centre study. The radial head prostheses were classified as having either a long (30-mm) or short (16- to 22-mm) stem. The long-stemmed implants comprised 30 GUEPAR® DePuy Synthes (West Chester, PA, USA) and 20 Evolutive® Aston Medical (Saint-Etienne, France) devices; the short-stemmed implants comprised nine RECON and six STANDARD rHead® SBI-Stryker (Morrisville, PA, USA) devices. At last follow-up, clinical (range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Mayo Elbow Performance score) and radiographic (osteolysis) outcomes were assessed.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 76.78 months (24–141), the rate of painful loosening [6 (40%) vs 8 (16%), p = 0.047] and osteolysis [12 (80%) vs 23 (46%), p = 0.02] were significantly higher in patients with short-stemmed versus long-stemmed implants. Despite the significant difference in loosening between stems as groups, individual stem length was not determined.

Conclusions

Tight-fitting implants with short stems are more prone to painful loosening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN (1991) Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints. Clin Orthop 187–195 Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN (1991) Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints. Clin Orthop 187–195
3.
go back to reference Mason ML (1954) Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg 42:123–132CrossRefPubMed Mason ML (1954) Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg 42:123–132CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Moro JK, Werier J, MacDermid JC et al (2001) Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83–A:1201–1211CrossRefPubMed Moro JK, Werier J, MacDermid JC et al (2001) Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83–A:1201–1211CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Neuhaus V, Christoforou DC, Kachooei AR et al (2015) Radial head prosthesis removal: a retrospective case series of 14 patients. Arch Bone Jt Surg 3:88–93PubMedPubMedCentral Neuhaus V, Christoforou DC, Kachooei AR et al (2015) Radial head prosthesis removal: a retrospective case series of 14 patients. Arch Bone Jt Surg 3:88–93PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Van Glabbeek F, Van Riet RP, Baumfeld JA et al (2004) Detrimental effects of overstuffing or understuffing with a radial head replacement in the medial collateral-ligament deficient elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:2629–2635CrossRefPubMed Van Glabbeek F, Van Riet RP, Baumfeld JA et al (2004) Detrimental effects of overstuffing or understuffing with a radial head replacement in the medial collateral-ligament deficient elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:2629–2635CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tight-fitting radial head prosthesis: does stem size help prevent painful loosening?
Authors
Pierre Laumonerie
Nicolas Reina
Claudia Gutierrez
Stephanie Delclaux
Meagan E. Tibbo
Nicolas Bonnevialle
Pierre Mansat
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3644-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Orthopaedics 1/2018 Go to the issue