Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Paper

The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis

Authors: Young-Hoo Kim, Jang-Won Park, Jun-Shik Kim, Sang-Doo Park

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Our study sought to address four issues: (1) the relationship between postoperative overall anatomical knee alignment and the survival of total knee prostheses; (2) the relationship between postoperative coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial component and implant survival; (3) the relationship between postoperative sagittal alignment of the femoral and tibial components and implant survival; and (4) the relationship between postoperative rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial component and implant survival.

Methods

We reviewed 1,696 consecutive patients (3,048 knees). Radiographic and computed tomographic examinations were performed to determine the alignment of the femoral and tibial components. The mean duration of follow-up was 15.8 years (range, 11–18 years).

Results

Thirty (1.0 %) of the 3,048 total knee arthroplasties failed for a reason other than infection and periprosthetic fracture. Risk factors for failure of the components were: overall anatomical knee alignment less than 3° valgus, coronal alignment of the femoral component less than 2.0° valgus, flexion of the femoral component greater than 3°, coronal alignment of the tibial component less than 90°, sagittal alignment of the tibial component less than 0° or greater than 7° slope, and external rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components less than 2°

Conclusion

In order to improve the survival rate of the knee prosthesis, we believe that a surgeon should aim to place the total knee components in the position of: overall anatomical knee alignment at an angle of 3–7.5° valgus; femoral component alignment, 2–8.0° valgus; femoral sagittal alignment, 0–3°; tibial coronal alignment, 90°; tibial sagittal alignment, 0–7°; femoral rotational alignment, 2–5° external rotation; and tibial rotational alignment, 2–5° external rotation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laskin RS, Beksac B (2006) Computer-assisted navigation in TKA: where we are and where we are going. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:127–131PubMedCrossRef Laskin RS, Beksac B (2006) Computer-assisted navigation in TKA: where we are and where we are going. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:127–131PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34PubMedCrossRef Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(6 suppl):39–43PubMedCrossRef Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(6 suppl):39–43PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709–714PubMed Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709–714PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ritter MA (2009) The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(6):745–749PubMedCrossRef Ritter MA (2009) The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(6):745–749PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156PubMed Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156PubMed
7.
go back to reference Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149PubMedCrossRef Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1217–1222PubMedCrossRef Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1217–1222PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr (1998) Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials 19:589–601PubMedCrossRef Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr (1998) Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials 19:589–601PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML (2008) The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32(5):639–642PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML (2008) The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32(5):639–642PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lewallen DG, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1984) Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(8):1211–1218PubMed Lewallen DG, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1984) Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(8):1211–1218PubMed
16.
go back to reference Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(4):551–556PubMed Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(4):551–556PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818–823PubMedCrossRef Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818–823PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sikorski JM, Blythe MC (2005) Learning the vagaries of computer-assisted total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(7):903–910PubMedCrossRef Sikorski JM, Blythe MC (2005) Learning the vagaries of computer-assisted total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(7):903–910PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clarke HD, Scuderi GR (2003) Flexion instability in primary total knee replacement. J knee Surg 16(2):123–128PubMed Clarke HD, Scuderi GR (2003) Flexion instability in primary total knee replacement. J knee Surg 16(2):123–128PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sah AP, Scott RD, Iorio R (2008) Angled polyethylene insert exchange for sagittal tibial malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(1):141–144PubMedCrossRef Sah AP, Scott RD, Iorio R (2008) Angled polyethylene insert exchange for sagittal tibial malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(1):141–144PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rienmüller A, Guggi T, Gruber G, Preiss S, Drobny T (2012) The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(10):2067–2072PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rienmüller A, Guggi T, Gruber G, Preiss S, Drobny T (2012) The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(10):2067–2072PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6):845–850PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6):845–850PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Insall JN (2003) The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:148–154PubMedCrossRef Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Insall JN (2003) The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:148–154PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Komistek RD, Scott RD, Dennis DA, Yasgur D, Anderson DT, Hajner ME (2002) In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press-fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 17(2):209–216PubMedCrossRef Komistek RD, Scott RD, Dennis DA, Yasgur D, Anderson DT, Hajner ME (2002) In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press-fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 17(2):209–216PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB (2003) Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:37–57PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB (2003) Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:37–57PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, Blyth M, McLean A. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 160(12)163–169 Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, Blyth M, McLean A. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 160(12)163–169
Metadata
Title
The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis
Authors
Young-Hoo Kim
Jang-Won Park
Jun-Shik Kim
Sang-Doo Park
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

International Orthopaedics 2/2014 Go to the issue