Published in:
01-07-2012 | Original Paper
Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures
Authors:
Yong Li, Lei Liu, Xin Tang, Fuxing Pei, Guanglin Wang, Yue Fang, Hui Zhang, Nicolas Crook
Published in:
International Orthopaedics
|
Issue 7/2012
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the results of a new technique for low, multidirectional locked nailing with closed reduction and minimally invasive plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures.
Methods
Forty-six matched patients were divided according to age, gender, Injury Severity Score, and fracture pattern into group A (expert tibial nailing) and group B (minimally invasive plating). Then, the patients were followed up, and the clinical and radiographic results were retrospectively analysed.
Results
The mean followed-up was 24.7 ± 2.7 months in group A and 25.8 ± 2.8 months in group B. No patient had nonunion, shortening, hardware breakdown, or deep-seated infection. Patients in group A had a significantly shorter mean operating time, hospital stay, full weight-bearing time and union time (76 ± 16.6 vs. 90 ± 20.3 minutes, p = 0.000; 5.8 ± 2.1 vs. 8.9 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.000; 9.0 ± 1.4 vs. 11.1 ± 1.7 weeks, p = 0.000; and 21.3 ± 3.5 vs. 23.1 ± 3.6 weeks, p = 0.047, respectively). Three patients in group A and one patient in group B presented with malalignment (p = 0.608). The mean Olerud-Molander Ankle score was 89.0 ± 7.1 in group A and 87.6 ± 8.4 in group B (p = 0.478).
Conclusions
Distal tibia metadiaphyseal fractures may be treated successfully with low, multidirectional locked nails or plates. However, low, multidirectional locked nailing may represent a superior surgical option, since it offers advantages in terms of mean operating time, hospital stay, full weight-bearing time and union time.