Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2009

01-02-2009 | Original Paper

Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?

Authors: S. Krüger, P. Y. Zambelli, P.-F. Leyvraz, B. M. Jolles

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Freehand positioning of the femoral drill guide is difficult during hip resurfacing and the surgeon is often unsure of the implant position achieved peroperatively. The purpose of this study was to find out whether, by using a navigation system, acetabular and femoral component positioning could be made easier and more precise. Eighteen patients operated on by the same surgeon were matched by sex, age, BMI, diagnosis and ASA score (nine patients with computer assistance, nine with the regular ancillary). Pre-operative planning was done on standard AP and axial radiographs with CT scan views for the computer-assisted operations. The final position of implants was evaluated by the same radiographs for all patients. The follow-up was at least 1 year. No difference between both groups in terms of femoral component position was observed (p > 0.05). There was also no difference in femoral notching. A trend for a better cup position was observed for the navigated hips, especially for cup anteversion. There was no additional operating time for the navigated hips. Hip navigation for resurfacing surgery may allow improved visualisation and hip implant positioning, but its advantage probably will be more obvious with mini-incisions than with regular incision surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208 (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208
2.
go back to reference Amstutz HC (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:452–453PubMed Amstutz HC (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:452–453PubMed
3.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2 to 6-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39PubMed Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2 to 6-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39PubMed
4.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Amstutz HC, Le Duff M, Dorey F (2004) Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 19:54–58PubMed Beaule PE, Amstutz HC, Le Duff M, Dorey F (2004) Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 19:54–58PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed
6.
go back to reference Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, Digioia AM III (2005) Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 10:37–43PubMedCrossRef Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, Digioia AM III (2005) Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 10:37–43PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ (2005) The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 20:358–361PubMedCrossRef Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ (2005) The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 20:358–361PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:177–184PubMedCrossRef Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:177–184PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R (2002) Early results pf primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 12:158–162 De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R (2002) Early results pf primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 12:158–162
10.
go back to reference DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20–32 DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20–32
11.
go back to reference DiGioia AM III, Jaramaz B, Plackeseychuk AY et al (2002) Comparison of a mechanical acetabuar alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17:359–364PubMedCrossRef DiGioia AM III, Jaramaz B, Plackeseychuk AY et al (2002) Comparison of a mechanical acetabuar alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17:359–364PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 17–27 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 17–27
13.
go back to reference Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed
14.
go back to reference Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL (1990) Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after 8 to 10 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:708–714PubMed Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL (1990) Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after 8 to 10 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:708–714PubMed
15.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–179PubMedCrossRef Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–179PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288PubMedCrossRef Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW (2005) Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:163–166PubMedCrossRef Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW (2005) Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:163–166PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Marti G, Baur C, Zambelli PY (2004) Optimal femoral head contour segmentation in CT images using dynamic programming. Technol Health Care 12:315–322PubMed Marti G, Baur C, Zambelli PY (2004) Optimal femoral head contour segmentation in CT images using dynamic programming. Technol Health Care 12:315–322PubMed
19.
go back to reference McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 159–170 McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 159–170
20.
go back to reference McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res S89–S98 McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res S89–S98
21.
go back to reference McMinn DJ, Roberts P, Forward GR (1991) A new approach to the hip for revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:899–901PubMed McMinn DJ, Roberts P, Forward GR (1991) A new approach to the hip for revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:899–901PubMed
22.
go back to reference Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC (2006) Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A 4- to 7-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:592–600PubMedCrossRef Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC (2006) Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A 4- to 7-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:592–600PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pollard TC, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC (2003) Is the Birmimgham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip Int 13:25–28 Pollard TC, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC (2003) Is the Birmimgham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip Int 13:25–28
24.
go back to reference Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:167–170PubMedCrossRef Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:167–170PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vail TP (2005) Surface replacement. Advanced reconstruction: hip. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Vail TP (2005) Surface replacement. Advanced reconstruction: hip. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Metadata
Title
Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?
Authors
S. Krüger
P. Y. Zambelli
P.-F. Leyvraz
B. M. Jolles
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0440-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

International Orthopaedics 1/2009 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Osteochondritis dissecans