Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2008

01-06-2008 | Original Paper

The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options

Authors: George Mouzopoulos, Michalis Stamatakos, Helen Arabatzi, George Vasiliadis, George Batanis, Anastasia Tsembeli, Mathaios Tzurbakis, Michalis Safioleas

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

According to the literature, hip function after hip fracture is affected by the type of surgery. Our aim was to determine the correlation between surgical treatment of hip fracture and postoperative function in the elderly. Inclusion criteria were displaced hip fracture and age over 70 years. One hundred and twenty-nine participants were randomly divided into three groups according to the type of the surgical operation they underwent (hemi-arthroplasty [Merete, Berlin, Germany], total arthroplasty [Plus; De Puy, Warsaw, IN, USA] and internal fixation [Richards plate screw; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA]). The function of the patients was estimated using the following parameters: the Barthel Index and Harris Hip Score, the range of passive hip motion, the gait speed of individuals, after 1 and 4 years of follow-up. The Barthel Index scores after 4 years of follow-up were 85.3, 82.6, 80.1 after total arthroplasty, hemi-arthroplasty and internal fixation respectively. Similarly, the Harris Hip Scores after 4 years of follow-up were 83.7, 79.5 and 73.6. The range of passive hip motion in the three groups of patients did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Also, patients of the total arthroplasty and hemi-arthroplasty groups walked faster than the patients of the internal fixation group 4 years after discharge (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we believe that total hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced subcapital hip fractures in patients over 70 years old.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Devereaux P, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, Obremskey W, Koval K, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch E, Guyatt G (2003) Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(9):1673–1681 Bhandari M, Devereaux P, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, Obremskey W, Koval K, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch E, Guyatt G (2003) Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(9):1673–1681
2.
go back to reference Ceder L, Thorngren G, Wallden B (1980) Prognostic indicators and early home rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip fractures. Clin Orthop 152:173–184PubMed Ceder L, Thorngren G, Wallden B (1980) Prognostic indicators and early home rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip fractures. Clin Orthop 152:173–184PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cserhati P, Fekete K, Berglund-Roden M, Wingstrand H, Thomgren K (2002) Hip fractures in Hungary and Sweden—differences in treatment and rehabilitation. Int Orthop 26(4):222–228PubMedCrossRef Cserhati P, Fekete K, Berglund-Roden M, Wingstrand H, Thomgren K (2002) Hip fractures in Hungary and Sweden—differences in treatment and rehabilitation. Int Orthop 26(4):222–228PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cuckler JM, Tamarapalli JR (1994) An algorithm for the management of femoral neck fractures. Orthopedics 17(9):789–792PubMed Cuckler JM, Tamarapalli JR (1994) An algorithm for the management of femoral neck fractures. Orthopedics 17(9):789–792PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cummings R, Phillips L, Wheat E, Black D, Goosby E, Wlodarczyk D, Trafton P, Jergesen H, Winograd C, Hulley S (1988) Recovery of function after hip fracture. The role of social supports. J Am Geriatr Soc 36(9):801–806PubMed Cummings R, Phillips L, Wheat E, Black D, Goosby E, Wlodarczyk D, Trafton P, Jergesen H, Winograd C, Hulley S (1988) Recovery of function after hip fracture. The role of social supports. J Am Geriatr Soc 36(9):801–806PubMed
6.
go back to reference Davidson CW, Merrilees MJ, Wilkinson TJ, Mckie J, Gilchrist N (2001) Hip fracture mortality and morbidity—can we do better? N Z Med J 114(1136):329–332PubMed Davidson CW, Merrilees MJ, Wilkinson TJ, Mckie J, Gilchrist N (2001) Hip fracture mortality and morbidity—can we do better? N Z Med J 114(1136):329–332PubMed
7.
go back to reference Haentjens P (2003) Costs of care after hospital discharge among women with a femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop 1(414):250–258 Haentjens P (2003) Costs of care after hospital discharge among women with a femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop 1(414):250–258
8.
go back to reference Harris HW (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by Moore arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51:737–755 Harris HW (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by Moore arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51:737–755
9.
go back to reference Healey W, Iorio R (2004) Hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop 429:43–48CrossRef Healey W, Iorio R (2004) Hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop 429:43–48CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Koval J, Zuckerman D (1994) Hip fractures. I. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:141–149PubMed Koval J, Zuckerman D (1994) Hip fractures. I. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:141–149PubMed
11.
go back to reference Koval J, Skovron L, Aharnoff B, Zuckerman J (1998) Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. Clin Orthop 348:22–28PubMed Koval J, Skovron L, Aharnoff B, Zuckerman J (1998) Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. Clin Orthop 348:22–28PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg J (1994) Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76(1):15–25 Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg J (1994) Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76(1):15–25
13.
go back to reference Magaziner J, Simonsick M, Kashner M, Hebel J, Kenzora J (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 45(3):101–107 Magaziner J, Simonsick M, Kashner M, Hebel J, Kenzora J (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 45(3):101–107
14.
go back to reference Marottoli A, Berkman F, Cooney M (1992) Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 40(9):861–866PubMed Marottoli A, Berkman F, Cooney M (1992) Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 40(9):861–866PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mossey M, Murtan E, Knott K, Graik R (1989) Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychological factors. Am J Public Health 79(3):279–286PubMedCrossRef Mossey M, Murtan E, Knott K, Graik R (1989) Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychological factors. Am J Public Health 79(3):279–286PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Parker J, Pryor A (2000) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:406–440 Parker J, Pryor A (2000) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:406–440
17.
go back to reference Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemi-arthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury 31:793–797PubMedCrossRef Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemi-arthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury 31:793–797PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sembo I (2002) A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(2):183–188PubMedCrossRef Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sembo I (2002) A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(2):183–188PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42:703–709PubMedCrossRef Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42:703–709PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Skinner P, Riley D, Ellery J, Beaumont A, Cumine R, Shafighian B (1989) Displaced subcapital fractures of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of internal fixation, hemi-arthroplasty and total hip replacement. Injury 20:291–293PubMedCrossRef Skinner P, Riley D, Ellery J, Beaumont A, Cumine R, Shafighian B (1989) Displaced subcapital fractures of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of internal fixation, hemi-arthroplasty and total hip replacement. Injury 20:291–293PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Su H, Aharonoff GB, Hiebert R, Zuckerman J, Koval K (2000) In-hospital mortality after femoral neck fracture: do internal fixation and hemi-arthroplasty differ? Am J Orthop 32(3):151–155 Su H, Aharonoff GB, Hiebert R, Zuckerman J, Koval K (2000) In-hospital mortality after femoral neck fracture: do internal fixation and hemi-arthroplasty differ? Am J Orthop 32(3):151–155
22.
go back to reference Swiontkowski F (1994) Current concepts review: intracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg 76A:129–138 Swiontkowski F (1994) Current concepts review: intracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg 76A:129–138
23.
go back to reference Tanaka J, Tokimura F, Seki N (2003) Outcomes of hip fracture surgery in patients aged > or = 90 years. Orthopedics 26(1):55–58PubMed Tanaka J, Tokimura F, Seki N (2003) Outcomes of hip fracture surgery in patients aged > or = 90 years. Orthopedics 26(1):55–58PubMed
24.
go back to reference Wade T, Collin C (1988) The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 10:64–67PubMed Wade T, Collin C (1988) The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 10:64–67PubMed
25.
go back to reference Young Y, German P, Brandt L, Kenzora J, Magaziner J (1996) The predictors of surgical procedure and the effects on functional recovery in elderly with subcapital fractures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 51:158–164 Young Y, German P, Brandt L, Kenzora J, Magaziner J (1996) The predictors of surgical procedure and the effects on functional recovery in elderly with subcapital fractures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 51:158–164
26.
go back to reference Young Y, Brandt L, German P, Kenzora J, Magaziner J (1997) A longitudinal examination of functional recovery among older people with subcapital hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(3):288–294PubMed Young Y, Brandt L, German P, Kenzora J, Magaziner J (1997) A longitudinal examination of functional recovery among older people with subcapital hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(3):288–294PubMed
Metadata
Title
The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options
Authors
George Mouzopoulos
Michalis Stamatakos
Helen Arabatzi
George Vasiliadis
George Batanis
Anastasia Tsembeli
Mathaios Tzurbakis
Michalis Safioleas
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0321-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

International Orthopaedics 3/2008 Go to the issue