Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 4/2007

01-08-2007 | Review

Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty

Authors: R. P. Pitto, L. A. Mueller, K. Reilly, R. Schmidt, J. Munro

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Several factors can cause bone loss and fixation failure following total hip arthroplasty (THA), including polyethylene wear debris, implant micromotion and stress shielding. Various techniques have been used in an effort to detect bone density loss in vivo, all with varying success. Quantitative computed tomography (qCT)-assisted osteodensitometry has been shown to be useful in assessing the in vivo structural bone changes after THA. It has a high resolution, accuracy and reproducibility, thereby making it a useful tool for research purposes, and it is able to differentiate between cortical and cancellous bone structures and assess the bone/implant interface. This technique also provides valuable information about the pattern of stress shielding which occurs around the prosthesis and can show early bony changes, which may prove informative about the quality of implant fixation and surrounding bone adaptation. In conjunction with finite-element analysis, qCT is able to generate accurate patient-specific meshes on which to model implants and their effect on bone remodelling. This technology can be useful to predict bone remodelling and the quality of implant fixation using prostheses with different design and/or biomaterials. In the future, this tool could be used for pre-clinical validation of new implants before their introduction in the market-place.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E (1999) Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:143–147PubMedCrossRef Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E (1999) Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:143–147PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement on bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479–483PubMed Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement on bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479–483PubMed
3.
go back to reference Engh CA Jr, McAuley J, Sychterz CJ, Sacco ME, Engh CA Sr (2000) The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1414–1420PubMed Engh CA Jr, McAuley J, Sychterz CJ, Sacco ME, Engh CA Sr (2000) The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1414–1420PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89–92PubMedCrossRef Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89–92PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kroger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E (1998) Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 352:66–74 Kroger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E (1998) Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 352:66–74
6.
go back to reference Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184–190PubMedCrossRef Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184–190PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151–154PubMedCrossRef Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151–154PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lindgren JU, Svensson O, Mathieson EB (1996) Remodelling and pain after uncemented total hip replacement. Int Orthop 20:7–11PubMedCrossRef Lindgren JU, Svensson O, Mathieson EB (1996) Remodelling and pain after uncemented total hip replacement. Int Orthop 20:7–11PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218–221PubMedCrossRef Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218–221PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA (1998) Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1687–1698PubMed Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA (1998) Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1687–1698PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mow VC, Flatow EL, Foster RJ (1994) Biomechanics. In: Simon SR (ed) Orthopaedic basic science. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill. Mow VC, Flatow EL, Foster RJ (1994) Biomechanics. In: Simon SR (ed) Orthopaedic basic science. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill.
12.
go back to reference Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85–88PubMedCrossRef Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85–88PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rosenbaum TG, Bloebaum RD, Ashrafi S, Lester K (2006) Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res (in press) Rosenbaum TG, Bloebaum RD, Ashrafi S, Lester K (2006) Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res (in press)
14.
go back to reference Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325–329PubMedCrossRef Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325–329PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206–210PubMedCrossRef Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206–210PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP (2002) A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 26:299–302PubMedCrossRef Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP (2002) A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 26:299–302PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Mueller L, Nowak TE, Pitto RP (2003) Clinical outcome and periprosthetic bone remodelling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. Int Orthop 27:204–207PubMedCrossRef Schmidt R, Mueller L, Nowak TE, Pitto RP (2003) Clinical outcome and periprosthetic bone remodelling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. Int Orthop 27:204–207PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74–77PubMedCrossRef Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74–77PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A et al (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291–297CrossRef Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A et al (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291–297CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2006) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J Biomech (in press; Epub: Jan 19) Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2006) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J Biomech (in press; Epub: Jan 19)
21.
go back to reference Sumner DR, Galante JO (1992) Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Rel Res 274:202–212 Sumner DR, Galante JO (1992) Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Rel Res 274:202–212
22.
go back to reference Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement–5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97–100PubMedCrossRef Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement–5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97–100PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilkinson JM, Peel NFA, Elson RA, Stockley I, Eastell R (2001) Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:283–288PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson JM, Peel NFA, Elson RA, Stockley I, Eastell R (2001) Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:283–288PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wright JM, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Ghelman B, Roberts MM, Koh JL (2001) Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components: a prospective analysis with quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:529–533PubMedCrossRef Wright JM, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Ghelman B, Roberts MM, Koh JL (2001) Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components: a prospective analysis with quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:529–533PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zerahn B, Storgaard M, Johansen T, Olsen C, Lausten G, Kanstrup IL (1998) Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 22:225–229PubMedCrossRef Zerahn B, Storgaard M, Johansen T, Olsen C, Lausten G, Kanstrup IL (1998) Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 22:225–229PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146–150PubMedCrossRef Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146–150PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty
Authors
R. P. Pitto
L. A. Mueller
K. Reilly
R. Schmidt
J. Munro
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0257-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

International Orthopaedics 4/2007 Go to the issue