Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2004

01-10-2004 | Original Paper

Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties

Authors: James Varley, Martyn J. Parker

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

It has been stated in the literature that a bipolar hemiarthroplasty has a lower risk of dislocation compared to a unipolar hemiarthroplasty. As this statement has not been substantiated we undertook a systematic review of the literature of published articles from the last 40 years. In addition we used our own database of hip fractures. One hundred and thirty-three published articles were included in the review to give a total of 23,107 cases. The overall dislocation rate for all types of hemiarthroplasty was 791/23,107 (3.4%). An increased risk of dislocation was associated with a posterior surgical approach and the use of a cemented prosthesis. After adjustment for surgical approach and the use of cement there was no difference in risk of dislocation between unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties. There was an increased risk of open reduction for a bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C et al (1996) Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective trail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:391–394PubMed Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C et al (1996) Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective trail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:391–394PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chan RN-W, Hoskinson J (1975) Thompson prosthesis for fractured neck of femur. A comparison of surgical approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57:437–443PubMed Chan RN-W, Hoskinson J (1975) Thompson prosthesis for fractured neck of femur. A comparison of surgical approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57:437–443PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cornell CN, Levine D, Odoherty J, Lyden J (1998) Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop 348:67–71PubMed Cornell CN, Levine D, Odoherty J, Lyden J (1998) Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop 348:67–71PubMed
4.
go back to reference Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH et al (2001) Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur: a prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65–79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:206–212CrossRefPubMed Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH et al (2001) Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur: a prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65–79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:206–212CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference D’Ambrosia RD, Chuinard RG, D’Amico DM et al (1975) An analysis of dislocation of the cemented femoral hemiarthroplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141:534–538PubMed D’Ambrosia RD, Chuinard RG, D’Amico DM et al (1975) An analysis of dislocation of the cemented femoral hemiarthroplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141:534–538PubMed
6.
go back to reference Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW et al (2001) Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly; outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop 383:229–242PubMed Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW et al (2001) Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly; outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop 383:229–242PubMed
7.
go back to reference Keene GS, Parker MJ (1993) Hemiarthroplasty of the hip—the anterior or posterior approach? A comparison of surgical approaches. Injury 24:611–613CrossRefPubMed Keene GS, Parker MJ (1993) Hemiarthroplasty of the hip—the anterior or posterior approach? A comparison of surgical approaches. Injury 24:611–613CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S (1995) Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:79–82PubMed Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S (1995) Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:79–82PubMed
9.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Rajan D (2001) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Update Software, Oxford Parker MJ, Rajan D (2001) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Update Software, Oxford
10.
go back to reference Sikorski JM, Barrington R (1981) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:357–361 Sikorski JM, Barrington R (1981) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:357–361
11.
go back to reference Wood MR (1980) Femoral head replacement following fracture: an analysis of the surgical approach. Injury 11:317–320CrossRefPubMed Wood MR (1980) Femoral head replacement following fracture: an analysis of the surgical approach. Injury 11:317–320CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yassin M, Velan GJ, Garti A et al (2002) Bipolar hip prosthesis in the treatment of displace sub-capital fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(Suppl 3):298 Yassin M, Velan GJ, Garti A et al (2002) Bipolar hip prosthesis in the treatment of displace sub-capital fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(Suppl 3):298
Metadata
Title
Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties
Authors
James Varley
Martyn J. Parker
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0572-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

International Orthopaedics 5/2004 Go to the issue