Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Society Report

Standardized report template for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI: a collaborative product of the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma

Authors: Matthew S. Davenport, Eric M. Hu, Andrew Zhang, Atul B. Shinagare, Andrew D. Smith, Ivan Pedrosa, Samuel D. Kaffenberger, Stuart G. Silverman, For the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on RCC

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To create a succinct yet comprehensive evidence-based structured report template for indeterminate renal masses characterized at CT and MRI.

Methods

This IRB-exempt, iterative, multi-institutional quality improvement project was informed by published data derived from a multi-institutional survey and a multi-institutional review of CT and MRI radiology reports. A two-stage blinded Delphi process by the 16-member 12-institution Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma was conducted to create a structured report template for indeterminate renal masses evaluated at CT and MRI. Individual reporting characteristics were scored by members as ‘core,’ ‘optional,’ or ‘exclude.’ Threshold for inclusion was ≥ 80% support. If < 80% members considered a characteristic a ‘core’ feature, but ≥ 80% considered it either ‘core’ or ‘optional,’ it was considered an ‘optional’ feature. If neither was the case, the characteristic was excluded. Free-text comments were permitted. Characteristics considered ‘core’ by 50–99% of respondents in Round 1 (i.e., nonunanimous support) and uninvestigated free-text comments were assessed in Round 2. Core and optional structured reporting templates were derived.

Results

The response rate was 100% in Round 1 (16/16) and Round 2 (16/16). In Round 1, 5 characteristics had unanimous support as ‘core’ features. Following Round 2, 13 characteristics had ≥ 80% support as ‘core’ features, and 10 characteristics had ≥ 80% support as ‘optional’ features. Structured report templates were derived.

Discussion

Structured ‘core’ and ‘optional’ templates for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI were derived, which may improve compliance with reporting preferred and essential imaging characteristics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270:248–260CrossRefPubMed Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270:248–260CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dickerson E, Davenport MS, Syed F, et al. (2017) Effect of template reporting of brain MRIs for multiple sclerosis on report thoroughness and neurologist-rated quality: results of a prospective quality improvement project. J Am Coll Radiol 14:371–379CrossRefPubMed Dickerson E, Davenport MS, Syed F, et al. (2017) Effect of template reporting of brain MRIs for multiple sclerosis on report thoroughness and neurologist-rated quality: results of a prospective quality improvement project. J Am Coll Radiol 14:371–379CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, et al. (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274:464–472CrossRefPubMed Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, et al. (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274:464–472CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ganeshan D, Duong PT, Probyn L, et al. (2018) Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol 25:66–73CrossRefPubMed Ganeshan D, Duong PT, Probyn L, et al. (2018) Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol 25:66–73CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Marcovici PA, Taylor GA (2014) Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed Marcovici PA, Taylor GA (2014) Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, et al. (2017) Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 52:232–239CrossRefPubMed Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, et al. (2017) Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 52:232–239CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Davenport MS, Hu EM, Smith AD, et al. (2017) Reporting standards for the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses on CT and MRI: a national survey of academic abdominal radiologists and urologists. Abdom Radiol 42:1229–1240CrossRef Davenport MS, Hu EM, Smith AD, et al. (2017) Reporting standards for the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses on CT and MRI: a national survey of academic abdominal radiologists and urologists. Abdom Radiol 42:1229–1240CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D (2011) Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:95–105CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D (2011) Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:95–105CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sun BC, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Cruz JD, et al. (2012) Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research. Acad Emerg Med 19:694–702CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sun BC, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Cruz JD, et al. (2012) Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research. Acad Emerg Med 19:694–702CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bosniak MA (2012) The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later. Radiology 262:781–785CrossRefPubMed Bosniak MA (2012) The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later. Radiology 262:781–785CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371CrossRefPubMed Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249:16–31CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249:16–31CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS (2017) Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol 198:12–21CrossRefPubMed Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS (2017) Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol 198:12–21CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182:844–853. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182:844–853.
18.
go back to reference Parsons RB, Canter D, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2012) RENAL Nephrometry scoring system: the radiologist’s perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W355–359CrossRefPubMed Parsons RB, Canter D, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2012) RENAL Nephrometry scoring system: the radiologist’s perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W355–359CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Canvasser NE, Kay FU, Xi Y, et al. (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to identify clear cell renal cell carcinoma in cT1a renal masses. J Urol 198:780–786CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Canvasser NE, Kay FU, Xi Y, et al. (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to identify clear cell renal cell carcinoma in cT1a renal masses. J Urol 198:780–786CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ayyathurai R, Garcia-Roig M, Gorin MA, et al. (2012) Bland thrombus association with tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: analysis of surgical significance and role of inferior vena caval interruption. BJU Int 110:E449–455CrossRefPubMed Ayyathurai R, Garcia-Roig M, Gorin MA, et al. (2012) Bland thrombus association with tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: analysis of surgical significance and role of inferior vena caval interruption. BJU Int 110:E449–455CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Standardized report template for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI: a collaborative product of the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma
Authors
Matthew S. Davenport
Eric M. Hu
Andrew Zhang
Atul B. Shinagare
Andrew D. Smith
Ivan Pedrosa
Samuel D. Kaffenberger
Stuart G. Silverman
For the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on RCC
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1851-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Abdominal Radiology 4/2019 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The “honeycomb” gallbladder

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine