Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2008

Open Access 01-09-2008

The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer

Authors: Roy Vliegen, Raphaela Dresen, Geerard Beets, Alette Daniels-Gooszen, Alfons Kessels, Jos van Engelshoven, Regina Beets-Tan

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of Multi-detector row CT (MDCT) for the prediction of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia (MRF).

Materials and methods

A total of 35 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MDCT. The tumor relationship to the MRF, expressed in 3 categories (1—tumor free MRF = tumor distance ≥ 1 mm; 2—threatened = distance < 1 mm; 3—invasion = distance 0 mm) was determined on CT by two observers at patient level and at different anatomical locations. A third expert reader evaluated the MRF tumor relationship on MRI, which served as reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-curves) and areas under these curves (AUC) were calculated. The inter-observer agreement of CT was determined by using linear weighted kappa statistics.

Results

The AUC of CT for MRF invasion was 0.71 for observer 1 and 0.62 for observer 2. The inter-observer agreement was kappa = 0.34. The performance of CT at mid-high rectal levels was statistically significant better compared to low anterior (obs.1: AUC = 0.88 vs. 0.50; obs 2: AUC = 0.84 vs. 0.31; P ≤ 0.040).

Conclusion

Multi-detector row CT has a poor accuracy for predicting MRF invasion in low-anterior located tumors.The accuracy of CT significantly improves for tumors in the mid-high rectum. There is a high inconsistency among readers.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Enker WE (1997) Total mesorectal excision-the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med 29:127–133PubMed Enker WE (1997) Total mesorectal excision-the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med 29:127–133PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al. (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646PubMedCrossRef Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al. (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sauer R, Beckers H, Hohenberger W et al. (2004) Preoperative vs postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Beckers H, Hohenberger W et al. (2004) Preoperative vs postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Valentini V, Glimelius B, Minsky BD et al. (2005) The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which support the need for an European consensus. Radiother Oncol 76:241–250PubMedCrossRef Valentini V, Glimelius B, Minsky BD et al. (2005) The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which support the need for an European consensus. Radiother Oncol 76:241–250PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:127–131PubMedCrossRef Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:127–131PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg E et al. (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg E et al. (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF et al. (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumor-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMedCrossRef Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF et al. (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumor-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference MERCURY study group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 333:779–790CrossRef MERCURY study group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 333:779–790CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ et al. (2005) Imaging for predicting the risk factors—the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease—of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:259–268PubMedCrossRef Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ et al. (2005) Imaging for predicting the risk factors—the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease—of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:259–268PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG et al. (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355–364PubMedCrossRef Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG et al. (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355–364PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Taylor A, Sheridan M, Mc Gee S et al. (2005) Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer by MR imaging: results of a UK survey. Clin Radiol 60:579–586PubMedCrossRef Taylor A, Sheridan M, Mc Gee S et al. (2005) Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer by MR imaging: results of a UK survey. Clin Radiol 60:579–586PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Taylor A, Slater A, Mapstone N et al. (2007) Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT. Abdom Imaging 32:323–327PubMedCrossRef Taylor A, Slater A, Mapstone N et al. (2007) Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT. Abdom Imaging 32:323–327PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W et al. (2004) Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR 183:421–427PubMed Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W et al. (2004) Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR 183:421–427PubMed
15.
go back to reference Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T et al. (2003) A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 185:556–559PubMedCrossRef Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T et al. (2003) A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 185:556–559PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kulinna C, Scheidler J, Strauss T et al. (2004) Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multi-slice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:123–130PubMedCrossRef Kulinna C, Scheidler J, Strauss T et al. (2004) Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multi-slice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:123–130PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sinha R,Verma R, Rajesh A et al. (2006) Diagnostic value of multi-detector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61:924–931PubMedCrossRef Sinha R,Verma R, Rajesh A et al. (2006) Diagnostic value of multi-detector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61:924–931PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wolberink S, Beets-Tan RG, de Haas-Kock D et al. (2007) Conventional CT for the prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin in primary rectal cancer. Dig Dis 25:80–85PubMedCrossRef Wolberink S, Beets-Tan RG, de Haas-Kock D et al. (2007) Conventional CT for the prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin in primary rectal cancer. Dig Dis 25:80–85PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hanley J, McNeil B et al. (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed Hanley J, McNeil B et al. (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed
20.
go back to reference Cohen J (1986) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–230CrossRef Cohen J (1986) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–230CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T et al. (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124PubMedCrossRef Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T et al. (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schima W (2006) MRI of the pancreas: tumors and tumor-simulating processes. Cancer Imaging 6:199–203PubMedCrossRef Schima W (2006) MRI of the pancreas: tumors and tumor-simulating processes. Cancer Imaging 6:199–203PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Salerno G, Sinnatamby C, Branagan G et al. (2006) Defining the rectum: surgically, radiologically and anatomically. Colorectal Dis 8(Suppl 3):5–9PubMedCrossRef Salerno G, Sinnatamby C, Branagan G et al. (2006) Defining the rectum: surgically, radiologically and anatomically. Colorectal Dis 8(Suppl 3):5–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Slater A, Halligan S, Taylor SA et al. (2006) Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: effect of rectal distention and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumor-free circumferential resection margin. Clin Radiol 61:65–70PubMedCrossRef Slater A, Halligan S, Taylor SA et al. (2006) Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: effect of rectal distention and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumor-free circumferential resection margin. Clin Radiol 61:65–70PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vliegen RF, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt M et al. (2005) Rectal cancer–MR imaging in local staging: is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful? Radiology 234:179–188PubMedCrossRef Vliegen RF, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt M et al. (2005) Rectal cancer–MR imaging in local staging: is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful? Radiology 234:179–188PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Peschaud F, Cuenod CA, Benoist S et al. (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1603–1609PubMedCrossRef Peschaud F, Cuenod CA, Benoist S et al. (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1603–1609PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
Authors
Roy Vliegen
Raphaela Dresen
Geerard Beets
Alette Daniels-Gooszen
Alfons Kessels
Jos van Engelshoven
Regina Beets-Tan
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Abdominal Radiology 5/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine