Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2008

01-05-2008

Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT vs. integrated FDG PET/CT

Authors: Sang Soo Shin, Yong Yeon Jeong, Jung Jun Min, Hyeong Rok Kim, Tae Woong Chung, Heoung Keun Kang

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging is essential in determining the optimal therapeutic planning for individual patients. The computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer, even if controversial, may be useful for planning surgery and/or neoadjuvant therapy, particularly when local tumor extension into adjacent organs or distant metastases are detected. There have been significant changes in the CT technology with the advent of multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scanner. Advances in CT technology have raised interest in the potential role of CT for detection and staging of colorectal cancer. In recent studies, MDCT with MPR images has shown promising accuracy in the evaluation of local extent and nodal involvement of colorectal cancer. Combined PET/CT images have significant advantages over either alone because it provides both functional and anatomical data. Therefore, it is natural to expect that PET/CT would improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. The most significant additional information provided by PET/CT relates to the accurate detection of distant metastases. For the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer, CT has relative advantages over PET/CT in regard to the depth of tumor invasion through the wall, extramural extension, and regional lymph node metastases. PET/CT should be performed on selected patients with suggestive but inconclusive metastatic lesions with CT. In addition, PET/CT with dedicated CT protocols, such as contrast-enhanced PET/CT and PET/CT colonography, may replace the diagnostic CT for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Furukawa H, Ikuma H, Seki A et al (2006) Positron emission tomography scanning is not superior to whole body multidetector helical computed tomography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer Gut 55:1007–1011PubMedCrossRef Furukawa H, Ikuma H, Seki A et al (2006) Positron emission tomography scanning is not superior to whole body multidetector helical computed tomography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer Gut 55:1007–1011PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Iyer RB, Silverman PM, DuBrow RA et al (2002) Imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of colorectal cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:3–13PubMed Iyer RB, Silverman PM, DuBrow RA et al (2002) Imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of colorectal cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:3–13PubMed
3.
go back to reference Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M et al (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography–initial experience Radiology 231:83–90PubMedCrossRef Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M et al (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography–initial experience Radiology 231:83–90PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Passariello R (2005) Colorectal carcinoma: detection and staging with multislice CT (MSCT) colonography Abdom Imaging 30:13–19PubMedCrossRef Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Passariello R (2005) Colorectal carcinoma: detection and staging with multislice CT (MSCT) colonography Abdom Imaging 30:13–19PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gollub MJ, Schwartz LH, Akhurst T (2007) Update on colorectal cancer imaging Radiol Clin North Am 45:85–118PubMedCrossRef Gollub MJ, Schwartz LH, Akhurst T (2007) Update on colorectal cancer imaging Radiol Clin North Am 45:85–118PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D et al (1988) Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:301–306PubMed Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D et al (1988) Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:301–306PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gazelle GS, Gaa J, Saini S et al (1995) Staging of colon carcinoma using water enema CT J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:87–91PubMedCrossRef Gazelle GS, Gaa J, Saini S et al (1995) Staging of colon carcinoma using water enema CT J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:87–91PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thoeni RF (1997) Colorectal cancer: radiologic staging Radiol Clin North Am 35:457–485PubMed Thoeni RF (1997) Colorectal cancer: radiologic staging Radiol Clin North Am 35:457–485PubMed
9.
go back to reference Harvey CJ, Amin Z, Hare CM et al (1998) Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1439–1443PubMed Harvey CJ, Amin Z, Hare CM et al (1998) Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1439–1443PubMed
10.
go back to reference Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Raptopoulos V et al (2000) Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions Dis Colon Rectum 43:303–311PubMedCrossRef Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Raptopoulos V et al (2000) Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions Dis Colon Rectum 43:303–311PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jin KN, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer Eur Radiol 16:2284–2291PubMedCrossRef Jin KN, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer Eur Radiol 16:2284–2291PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W et al (2004) Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:421–427PubMed Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W et al (2004) Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:421–427PubMed
13.
go back to reference Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2006) Efficacy of PET/CT in the accurate evaluation of primary colorectal carcinoma Eur J Surg Oncol 32:941–947PubMedCrossRef Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2006) Efficacy of PET/CT in the accurate evaluation of primary colorectal carcinoma Eur J Surg Oncol 32:941–947PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rosenbaum SJ, Stergar H, Antoch G et al (2006) Staging and follow-up of gastrointestinal tumors with PET/CT Abdom Imaging 31:25–35PubMedCrossRef Rosenbaum SJ, Stergar H, Antoch G et al (2006) Staging and follow-up of gastrointestinal tumors with PET/CT Abdom Imaging 31:25–35PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cohade C, Osman M, Leal J et al (2003) Direct comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma J Nucl Med 44:1797–1803PubMed Cohade C, Osman M, Leal J et al (2003) Direct comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma J Nucl Med 44:1797–1803PubMed
16.
go back to reference Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P et al (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240:1027–1036PubMedCrossRef Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P et al (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240:1027–1036PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven
18.
go back to reference Veit P, Ruehm S, Kuehl H et al (2006) Lymph node staging with dual-modality PET/CT: Enhancing the diagnostic accuracy in oncology Eur J Radiol 58:383–389PubMedCrossRef Veit P, Ruehm S, Kuehl H et al (2006) Lymph node staging with dual-modality PET/CT: Enhancing the diagnostic accuracy in oncology Eur J Radiol 58:383–389PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Angelelli G, Macarini L, Lupo L et al (1990) Rectal carcinoma: CT staging with water as contrast medium Radiology 177:511–514PubMed Angelelli G, Macarini L, Lupo L et al (1990) Rectal carcinoma: CT staging with water as contrast medium Radiology 177:511–514PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M (1999) Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma. Eur Radiol 9:78–84PubMedCrossRef Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M (1999) Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma. Eur Radiol 9:78–84PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chiesura-Corona M, Muzzio PC, Giust G et al (2001) Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation Abdom Imaging 26:134–138PubMedCrossRef Chiesura-Corona M, Muzzio PC, Giust G et al (2001) Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation Abdom Imaging 26:134–138PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hulsmans FJ, Tio TL, Fockens P et al (1994) Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary Radiology 190:715–720PubMed Hulsmans FJ, Tio TL, Fockens P et al (1994) Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary Radiology 190:715–720PubMed
23.
go back to reference Maier AG, Barton PP, Neuhold NR et al (1997) Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation Radiology 203:785–789PubMed Maier AG, Barton PP, Neuhold NR et al (1997) Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation Radiology 203:785–789PubMed
24.
go back to reference Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M et al (2005) Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:495–500PubMedCrossRef Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M et al (2005) Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:495–500PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR et al (2002) Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings Radiology 224:783–787PubMedCrossRef Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR et al (2002) Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings Radiology 224:783–787PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shin SS, Jeong YY, Shen YL, et al. (2006) Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison of spiral CT and integrated FDG PET/CT. In: Presented at the annual meeting of the RSNA; Chicago, Illinois Shin SS, Jeong YY, Shen YL, et al. (2006) Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison of spiral CT and integrated FDG PET/CT. In: Presented at the annual meeting of the RSNA; Chicago, Illinois
27.
go back to reference Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM et al (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings Radiology 206:755–760PubMed Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM et al (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings Radiology 206:755–760PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O, Visokai V et al (2003) Routine 18F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making J Nucl Med 44:1784–1788PubMed Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O, Visokai V et al (2003) Routine 18F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making J Nucl Med 44:1784–1788PubMed
29.
go back to reference Mukai M, Sadahiro S, Yasuda S et al (2000) Preoperative evaluation by whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with primary colorectal cancer Oncol Rep 7:85–87PubMed Mukai M, Sadahiro S, Yasuda S et al (2000) Preoperative evaluation by whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with primary colorectal cancer Oncol Rep 7:85–87PubMed
30.
go back to reference Kuehl H, Veit P, Rosenbaum SJ et al (2007) Can PET/CT replace separate diagnostic CT for cancer imaging? optimizing CT protocols for imaging cancers of the chest and abdomen J Nucl Med 48 Suppl 1:45S–57S Kuehl H, Veit P, Rosenbaum SJ et al (2007) Can PET/CT replace separate diagnostic CT for cancer imaging? optimizing CT protocols for imaging cancers of the chest and abdomen J Nucl Med 48 Suppl 1:45S–57S
31.
32.
go back to reference Thoeni RF (1991) Colorectal cancer: cross-sectional imaging for staging of primary tumor and detection of local recurrence AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:909–915PubMed Thoeni RF (1991) Colorectal cancer: cross-sectional imaging for staging of primary tumor and detection of local recurrence AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:909–915PubMed
33.
go back to reference Elmas N, Killi RM, Sever A (2002) Colorectal carcinoma: radiological diagnosis and staging Eur J Radiol 42:206–223PubMedCrossRef Elmas N, Killi RM, Sever A (2002) Colorectal carcinoma: radiological diagnosis and staging Eur J Radiol 42:206–223PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Veit P, Kuhle C, Beyer T et al (2006) Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer Gut 55:68–73PubMedCrossRef Veit P, Kuhle C, Beyer T et al (2006) Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer Gut 55:68–73PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF et al (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF et al (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A et al (2001) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT Radiology 218:55–60PubMed Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A et al (2001) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT Radiology 218:55–60PubMed
37.
go back to reference Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F et al (2000) FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: Correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1005–1008PubMed Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F et al (2000) FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: Correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1005–1008PubMed
38.
go back to reference Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, et al (2004) Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery Radiographics 24:1367–1380PubMedCrossRef Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, et al (2004) Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery Radiographics 24:1367–1380PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference de Bree E, Witkamp AJ, Zoetmulder FA (2002) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer J Surg Oncol 79:46–61PubMedCrossRef de Bree E, Witkamp AJ, Zoetmulder FA (2002) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer J Surg Oncol 79:46–61PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference de Bree E, Koops W, Kroger R et al (2004) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin: correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement J Surg Oncol 86:64–73PubMedCrossRef de Bree E, Koops W, Kroger R et al (2004) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin: correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement J Surg Oncol 86:64–73PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF et al (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography N Engl J Med 348:2500–2507PubMedCrossRef Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF et al (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography N Engl J Med 348:2500–2507PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT vs. integrated FDG PET/CT
Authors
Sang Soo Shin
Yong Yeon Jeong
Jung Jun Min
Hyeong Rok Kim
Tae Woong Chung
Heoung Keun Kang
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9262-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Abdominal Radiology 3/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine