Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2021

Open Access 01-05-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Guidelines

E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET

Authors: Francesco Ceci, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Louise Emmett, Judit A. Adam, Jamshed Bomanji, Johannes Czernin, Matthias Eiber, Uwe Haberkorn, Michael S. Hofman, Thomas A. Hope, Rakesh Kumar, Steven P. Rowe, Sarah M. Schwarzenboeck, Stefano Fanti, Ken Herrmann

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Rationale

The development of consensus guidelines for interpretation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is needed to provide more consistent reports in clinical practice. The standardization of PSMA-PET interpretation may also contribute to increasing the data reproducibility within clinical trials. Finally, guidelines in PSMA-PET interpretation are needed to communicate the exact location of findings to referring physicians, to support clinician therapeutic management decisions.

Methods

A panel of worldwide experts in PSMA-PET was established. Panelists were selected based on their expertise and publication record in the diagnosis or treatment of PCa, in their involvement in clinical guidelines and according to their expertise in the clinical application of radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors. Panelists were actively involved in all stages of a modified, nonanonymous, Delphi consensus process.

Results

According to the findings obtained by modified Delphi consensus process, panelist recommendations were implemented in a structured report for PSMA-PET.

Conclusions

The E-PSMA standardized reporting guidelines, a document supported by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), provide consensus statements among a panel of experts in PSMA-PET imaging, to develop a structured report for PSMA-PET in prostate cancer and to harmonize diagnostic interpretation criteria.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
O’Keefe DS, Bacich DJ, Huang SS, Heston WDW. A perspective on the evolving story of PSMA biology, PSMA-based imaging, and endoradiotherapeutic strategies. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(7):1007–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Gordon IO, Tretiakova MS, Noffsinger AE, Hart J, Reuter VE, Al-Ahmadie HA. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in regeneration and repair. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(12):1421–7.PubMed
3.
4.
Aggarwal R, Wei X, Kim W, et al. Heterogeneous flare in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography tracer uptake with initiation of androgen pathway blockade in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(1):78–82.PubMed
5.
Emmett L, Yin C, Crumbaker M, et al. Rapid modulation of PSMA expression by androgen deprivation: serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in men with hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer commencing androgen blockade. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):950–4.PubMed
6.
Fendler WP, Weber M, Iravani A, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7448–54.PubMed
7.
Eder M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Hull W-E, Wängler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23(4):688–97.PubMed
8.
Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, De Santis M, Fanti S, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3.
9.
Gillessen S, Omlin A, Attard G, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: recommendations of the St Gallen Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):e3.PubMed
10.
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 27]. Eur Urol. 2020:S0302–2838(20)30048–8.
11.
Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):403–17.PubMed
12.
Calais J, Ceci F, Eiber M, et al. 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):e613] [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e304]. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(9):1286–94.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Trabulsi EJ, Rumble RB, Jadvar H, et al. Optimum imaging strategies for advanced prostate cancer: ASCO Guideline [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 15]. J Clin Oncol. 2020:JCO1902757.
16.
17.
18.
Fanti S, Minozzi S, Morigi JJ, Giesel F, Ceci F, Uprimny C, et al. Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(10):1622–35.PubMed
19.
Eiber M, Herrmann K, Calais J, Hadaschik B, Giesel FL, Hartenbach M, et al. Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(3):469–78.PubMed
20.
Werner RA, Thackeray JT, Pomper MG, Bengel FM, Gorin MA, Derlin T, et al. Recent updates on molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS) for theranostic radiotracers-navigating pitfalls of SSTR- and PSMA-targeted PET/CT. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):pii: E1060.
21.
22.
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Ceci F, Cho S, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):1014–24.PubMed
23.
Chen Y, Pullambhatla M, Foss CA, Byun Y, Nimmagadda S, Senthamizhchelvan S, et al. 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pen tanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(24):7645–53.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
Sanchez-Crespo A. Comparison of Gallium-68 and Fluorine-18 imaging characteristics in positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:55–62.PubMed
26.
Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, et al. Early lesion detection with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(9):1911–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, et al. Detection efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):362–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zlatopolskiy BD, Endepols H, Krapf P, Guliyev M, Urusova EA, Richarz R, et al. Discovery of (18)F-JK-PSMA-7, a PET probe for the detection of small PSMA-positive lesions. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):817–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Eiber M, Kroenke M, Wurzer A, et al. 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(5):696–701.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Pfob CH, Ziegler S, Graner FP, Köhner M, Schachoff S, Blechert B, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-PSMA HBED CC—a PSMA specific probe for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(11):1962–70.PubMed
31.
Giesel FL, Hadaschik B, Cardinale J, Radtke J, Vinsensia M, Lehnert W, et al. F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(4):678–88.PubMed
32.
33.
Sheikhbahaei S, Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, Solnes LB, Javadi MS, Ross AE, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(12):2117–36.PubMed
34.
Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):786–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Ristau BT, O’Keefe DS, Bacich DJ. The prostate-specific membrane antigen: lessons and current clinical implications from 20 years of research. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(3):272–9.PubMed
36.
Siva S, Callahan J, Pryor D, Martin J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS. Utility of 68 Ga prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography in diagnosis and response assessment of recurrent renal cell carcinoma. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(3):372–8.PubMed
37.
Kesler M, Levine C, Hershkovitz D, et al. 68Ga-PSMA is a novel PET-CT tracer for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective pilot study [published online ahead of print, 2018 Jul 12]. J Nucl Med. 2018:jnumed.118.214833.
38.
Sathekge M, Modiselle M, Vorster M, et al. 68Ga-PSMA imaging of metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(9):1482–3.PubMed
39.
Rischpler C, Beck TI, Okamoto S, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC uptake in cervical, celiac, and sacral ganglia as an important pitfall in prostate cancer PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1406–11.PubMed
40.
Panagiotidis E, Paschali A, Giannoula E, Chatzipavlidou V. Rib fractures mimicking bone metastases in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(1):e46–e8.PubMed
41.
Rauscher I, Krönke M, König M, et al. Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):51–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Sasikumar A, Joy A, Nanabala R, Pillai MR, T AH. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT false-positive tracer uptake in Paget disease. Clin Nucl Med 2016;41(10):e454–e455.
43.
Ribeiro AMB, Lima ENP, Rocha MM. Fibrous dysplasia as a possible false-positive finding in 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography study in the follow-up of prostate cancer. World J Nucl Med. 2019;18(4):409–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Noto B, Vrachimis A, Schafers M, Stegger L, Rahbar K. Subacute stroke mimicking cerebral metastasis in 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(10):e449–51.PubMed
45.
Bilgin R, Ergul N, Cermik TF. Incidental meningioma mimicking metastasis of prostate adenocarcinoma in 68Ga-labeled PSMA ligand PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(12):956–8.
46.
47.
Hermann RM, Djannatian M, Czech N, Nitsche M. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT: false-positive results due to sarcoidosis? Case Rep Oncol. 2016;9(2):457–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Prasad V, Steffen IG, Diederichs G, Makowski MR, Wust P, Brenner W. Biodistribution of [68Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC in patients with prostate cancer: characterization of uptake in normal organs and tumour lesions. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18(3):428–36.PubMed
49.
Bouchelouche K, Vendelbo MH. Pulmonary opacities and bronchiectasis avid on 68Ga-PSMA PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(4):e216–e7.PubMed
50.
McGuiness M, Sounness B. 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT uptake in anthracosilicosis. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(10):e431–e2.PubMed
51.
Ahuja A, Taneja S, Thorat K, Jena A. 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid tubercular lesions mimicking prostate cancer metastasis on simultaneous prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/MRI. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(12):e509–e10.PubMed
52.
Lückerath K, Wei L, Fendler WP, et al. Preclinical evaluation of PSMA expression in response to androgen receptor blockade for theranostics in prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8(1):96.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Sasikumar A, Joy A, Nair BP, Pillai MRA, Madhavan J. False positive uptake in bilateral gynecomastia on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(9):e412–e4.PubMed
54.
Tosoian JJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Andreas D, Szabo Z, Pienta KJ, et al. Correlation of PSMA-targeted (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT findings with Immunohistochemical and genomic data in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(1):e65–e8.PubMed
55.
Ceci F, Bianchi L, Borghesi M, et al. Prediction nomogram for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in different clinical settings of PSA failure after radical treatment for prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(1):136–46.PubMed
56.
Bianchi L, Borghesi M, Schiavina R, et al. Predictive accuracy and clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer recurrence and PSA < 1 ng/ml external validation on a single institution database [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 31]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-020-04696-z.
57.
Ceci F, Castellucci P, Graziani T, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: efficacy in different clinical stages of PSA failure after radical therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(1):31–9.PubMed
58.
Rauscher I, Düwel C, Haller B, et al. Efficacy, predictive factors, and prediction nomograms for 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in early biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73(5):656–61.PubMed
59.
Budaus L, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Salomon G, Michl U, Heinzer H, Huland H, et al. Initial experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):393–6.PubMed
60.
Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1436–43.PubMed
61.
Farolfi A, Gafita A, Calais J, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography detects residual prostate cancer after prostatectomy in a multicenter retrospective study. J Urol. 2019;202(6):1174–81.PubMed
62.
Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, van der Sluis TM, Knol RJJ, van Kalmthout LWM, et al. Early lesion detection with (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(9):1911–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Tiguert R, Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, Oskanian P, Banerjee M, Grignon DJ, et al. Lymph node size does not correlate with the presence of prostate cancer metastasis. Urology. 1999;53(2):367–71.PubMed
64.
van Leeuwen PJ, Donswijk M, Nandurkar R, Stricker P, Ho B, Heijmink S, et al. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68) Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) predicts complete biochemical response from radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019;124(1):62–8.PubMed
65.
Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90.PubMed
66.
Corfield J, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2018;36(4):519–27.PubMed
67.
Eiber M, Weirich G, Holzapfel K, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Rauscher I, et al. Simultaneous (68)Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70(5):829–36.PubMed
68.
Rowe S, Gorin S, Pienta K, Siegel B, Carroll P, Pouliot F, et al. Results from the OSPREY trial: A prospective phase 2/3 multi-center study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer-examination of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:586.
69.
Kesch C, Vinsensia M, Radtke JP, Schlemmer HP, Heller M, Ellert E, et al. Intraindividual comparison of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with primary prostate cancer: a retrospective, Proof-of-Concept Study. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(11):1805–10.PubMed
70.
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16.PubMed
71.
Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M, et al. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsies. Eur Urol. 2019;75(3):506–14.PubMed
72.
Rousseau E, Wilson D, Lacroix-Poisson F, et al. A prospective study on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT imaging in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(11):1587–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Morris MJ, Carroll P, Probst S, Pouliot F, Saperstein L, Siegel BA. A prospective phase 2/3 multicenter study of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer: examination of diagnostic accuracy (OSPREY). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15).
74.
Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, Will L, Maurer T, Flechsig P, et al. Detection efficacy of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):362–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
75.
Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Seifert R, Wagner S, Schafers M, Bogemann M, et al. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2055–61.PubMedPubMedCentral
76.
77.
Ceci F, Herrmann K, Hadaschik B, Castellucci P, Fanti S. Therapy assessment in prostate cancer using choline and PSMA PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(Suppl 1):78–83.PubMed
78.
Fanti S, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K. Proposal of systemic therapy response assessment criteria in time of PSMA PET/CT imaging: PSMA PET Progression (PPP) [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 5]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.233817.
79.
Hofman MS, Emmett L, Violet J, et al. TheraP: a randomized phase 2 trial of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 theranostic treatment vs cabazitaxel in progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Clinical Trial Protocol ANZUP 1603). BJU Int. 2019;124(Suppl 1):5–13.PubMed
80.
Thang SP, Violet J, Sandhu S, et al. Poor outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with low prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression deemed ineligible for 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(6):670–6.PubMed
81.
Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):825–33.PubMed
82.
Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, et al. Long term follow-up and outcomes of re-treatment in an expanded 50 patient single-center phase II prospective trial of Lutetium-177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [published online ahead of print, 2019 Nov 15]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.236414.
Metadata
Title
E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET
Authors
Francesco Ceci
Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
Louise Emmett
Judit A. Adam
Jamshed Bomanji
Johannes Czernin
Matthias Eiber
Uwe Haberkorn
Michael S. Hofman
Thomas A. Hope
Rakesh Kumar
Steven P. Rowe
Sarah M. Schwarzenboeck
Stefano Fanti
Ken Herrmann
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2021 Go to the issue

Editorial

Is Patlak y-intercept a relevant metrics?

Original Article

Comparison of PET imaging of activated fibroblasts and 18F-FDG for diagnosis of primary hepatic tumours: a prospective pilot study

Image of the Month

Pitfalls in PSMA-PET/CT: intensive bone marrow uptake in a case with polycythemia vera

Original Article

Decoding COVID-19 pneumonia: comparison of deep learning and radiomics CT image signatures

Guidelines

An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases

Guidelines

International recommendations for personalised selective internal radiation therapy of primary and metastatic liver diseases with yttrium-90 resin microspheres