Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe)

Authors: Cristina Nanni, Annibale Versari, Stephane Chauvie, Elisa Bertone, Andrea Bianchi, Marco Rensi, Marilena Bellò, Andrea Gallamini, Francesca Patriarca, Francesca Gay, Barbara Gamberi, Pietro Ghedini, Michele Cavo, Stefano Fanti, Elena Zamagni

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

FDG PET/CT (18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography) is a useful tool to image multiple myeloma (MM). However, simple and reproducible reporting criteria are still lacking and there is the need for harmonization. Recently, a group of Italian nuclear medicine experts defined new visual descriptive criteria (Italian Myeloma criteria for Pet Use: IMPeTUs) to standardize FDG PET/CT evaluation in MM patients. The aim of this study was to assess IMPeTUs reproducibility on a large prospective cohort of MM patients.

Materials and methods

Patients affected by symptomatic MM who had performed an FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET0), after induction (PET-AI), and the end of treatment (PET-EoT) were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter trial (EMN02)(NCT01910987; MMY3033). After anonymization, PET images were uploaded in the web platform WIDEN® and hence distributed to five expert nuclear medicine reviewers for a blinded independent central review according to the IMPeTUs criteria. Consensus among reviewers was measured by the percentage of agreement and the Krippendorff’s alpha. Furthermore, on a patient-based analysis, the concordance among all the reviewers in terms of positivity or negativity of the FDG PET/CT scan was tested for different thresholds of positivity (Deauville score (DS 2, 3, 4, 5) for the main parameters (bone marrow, focal score, extra-medullary disease).

Results

Eighty-six patients (211 FDG PET/CT scans) were included in this analysis. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 35–66 years), 45% were male, 15% of them were in stage ISS (International Staging System) III, and 42% had high-risk cytogenetics. The percentage agreement was superior to 75% for all the time points, reaching 100% of agreement in assessing the presence skull lesions after therapy. Comparable results were obtained when the agreement analysis was performed using the Krippendorff’s alpha coefficient, either in every single time point of scanning (PET0, PET-AI or PET-EoT) or overall for all the scans together. DS proved highly reproducible with the highest reproducibility for score 4.

Conclusions

IMPeTUs criteria proved highly reproducible and could therefore be considered as a base for harmonizing PET interpretation in multiple myeloma. A prospective clinical validation of IMPeTUs criteria is underway.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cavo M, Terpos E, Nanni C, Moreau P, Lentzsch S, Zweegman S, et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(4):e206–17.CrossRefPubMed Cavo M, Terpos E, Nanni C, Moreau P, Lentzsch S, Zweegman S, et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(4):e206–17.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118(23):5989–95.CrossRefPubMed Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118(23):5989–95.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bartel TB, Haessler J, Brown TLY, Shaughnessy JDJ, van Rhee F, Anaissie E, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;114(10):2068–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bartel TB, Haessler J, Brown TLY, Shaughnessy JDJ, van Rhee F, Anaissie E, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;114(10):2068–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Falcone C, Cipullo S, Sannino P, Restuccia A. Whole body magnetic resonance and CT/PET in patients affected by multiple myeloma during staging before treatment. Recenti Prog Med. 2012;103(11):444–9.PubMed Falcone C, Cipullo S, Sannino P, Restuccia A. Whole body magnetic resonance and CT/PET in patients affected by multiple myeloma during staging before treatment. Recenti Prog Med. 2012;103(11):444–9.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Derlin T, Peldschus K, Munster S, Bannas P, Herrmann J, Stubig T, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for determination of remission status in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):570–8.CrossRefPubMed Derlin T, Peldschus K, Munster S, Bannas P, Herrmann J, Stubig T, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for determination of remission status in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):570–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fonti R, Larobina M, Del Vecchio S, De Luca S, Fabbricini R, Catalano L, et al. Metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(12):1829–35.CrossRefPubMed Fonti R, Larobina M, Del Vecchio S, De Luca S, Fabbricini R, Catalano L, et al. Metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(12):1829–35.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mesguich C, Fardanesh R, Tanenbaum L, Chari A, Jagannath S, Kostakoglu L. State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(12):2203–23.CrossRefPubMed Mesguich C, Fardanesh R, Tanenbaum L, Chari A, Jagannath S, Kostakoglu L. State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(12):2203–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nanni C, Zamagni E, Celli M, Caroli P, Ambrosini V, Tacchetti P, et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM): experience with 77 patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(2):e74–9.CrossRefPubMed Nanni C, Zamagni E, Celli M, Caroli P, Ambrosini V, Tacchetti P, et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM): experience with 77 patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(2):e74–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nanni C, Zamagni E, Versari A, Chauvie S, Bianchi A, Rensi M, et al. Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(3):414–21.CrossRefPubMed Nanni C, Zamagni E, Versari A, Chauvie S, Bianchi A, Rensi M, et al. Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(3):414–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG. When should FDG-PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma? Br J Haematol. 2014;164(3):315–28.CrossRefPubMed Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG. When should FDG-PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma? Br J Haematol. 2014;164(3):315–28.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Biggi A, Gallamini A, Chauvie S, Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, et al. International validation study for interim PET in ABVD-treated, advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: interpretation criteria and concordance rate among reviewers. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(5):683–90.CrossRefPubMed Biggi A, Gallamini A, Chauvie S, Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, et al. International validation study for interim PET in ABVD-treated, advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: interpretation criteria and concordance rate among reviewers. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(5):683–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A, Chauvie S, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, et al. The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):1107–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A, Chauvie S, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, et al. The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):1107–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cavo M, Gobbi M, Potamianu A, Lahaye M, Couturier C, Terpos E. Evaluation of experimental retreatment and prolonged therapy with subcutaneous (SC) bortezomib in patients (Pts) with multiple myeloma in first or second relapse, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study. In 2016. p. 3328. Cavo M, Gobbi M, Potamianu A, Lahaye M, Couturier C, Terpos E. Evaluation of experimental retreatment and prolonged therapy with subcutaneous (SC) bortezomib in patients (Pts) with multiple myeloma in first or second relapse, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study. In 2016. p. 3328.
14.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Method Meas. 2007;1:77–89. 33CrossRef Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Method Meas. 2007;1:77–89. 33CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chauvie S, Biggi A, Stancu A, Cerello P, Cavallo A, Fallanca F, et al. WIDEN: a tool for medical image management in multicenter clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2014;11(3):355–61.CrossRefPubMed Chauvie S, Biggi A, Stancu A, Cerello P, Cavallo A, Fallanca F, et al. WIDEN: a tool for medical image management in multicenter clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2014;11(3):355–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nanni C, Cottereau AS, Lopci E, Bodet-Milin C, Coronado M, Pro B, et al. Report of the 6th International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(10):2298–303.CrossRefPubMed Nanni C, Cottereau AS, Lopci E, Bodet-Milin C, Coronado M, Pro B, et al. Report of the 6th International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(10):2298–303.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe)
Authors
Cristina Nanni
Annibale Versari
Stephane Chauvie
Elisa Bertone
Andrea Bianchi
Marco Rensi
Marilena Bellò
Andrea Gallamini
Francesca Patriarca
Francesca Gay
Barbara Gamberi
Pietro Ghedini
Michele Cavo
Stefano Fanti
Elena Zamagni
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3909-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2018 Go to the issue