Published in:
01-06-2013 | Original Article
In vivo imaging of the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) with [18F]FEDAA1106 and PET does not show increased binding in Alzheimer’s disease patients
Authors:
Andrea Varrone, Patrik Mattsson, Anton Forsberg, Akihiro Takano, Sangram Nag, Balázs Gulyás, Jacqueline Borg, Ronald Boellaard, Nabil Al-Tawil, Maria Eriksdotter, Torsten Zimmermann, Marcus Schultze-Mosgau, Andrea Thiele, Anja Hoffmann, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Christer Halldin
Published in:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
|
Issue 6/2013
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Imaging the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is considered a potential tool for in vivo evaluation of microglial activation and neuroinflammation in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). ((R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-[11C]-methyl-N-(1-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinoline caboxamide ([11C]-(R)-PK11195) has been widely used for PET imaging of TSPO and, despite its low specific-to-nondisplaceable binding ratio, increased TSPO binding has been shown in AD patients. The high-affinity radioligand N-(5-fluoro-2-phenoxyphenyl)-N-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-5-methoxybenzyl)acetamide ([18F]FEDAA1106) has been developed as a potential in vivo imaging tool for better quantification of TSPO binding. The aim of this study was to quantify in vivo binding of [18F]FEDAA1106 to TSPO in control subjects and AD patients.
Methods
Seven controls (five men, two women, age 68±3 years, MMSE score 29±1) and nine AD patients (six men, three women, age 69±4 years, MMSE score 25±3) were studied with [18F]FEDAA1106. PET measurements were performed on an ECAT EXACT HR system (Siemens Medical Solutions) in two 60-min dynamic PET sessions with a 30-min interval between sessions. Arterial blood radioactivity was measured using an automated blood sampling system for the first 5 min and using manually drawn samples thereafter. Quantification was performed using both kinetic analysis based on a two-tissue compartment model and Logan graphical analysis. Outcome measures were total distribution volume (V
T) and binding potential (BP
ND=k
3/k
4). An estimate of nondisplaceable distribution volume was obtained with the Logan graphical analysis using the first 15 min of PET measurements (V
ND 1-15 min). Binding potential (BP
ND) was also calculated as: V
T/V
ND 1-15 min − 1.
Results
No statistically significant differences in V
T,
k
3/k
4 or BP
ND were observed between controls and AD patients.
Conclusion
This study suggests that TSPO imaging with [18F]FEDAA1106 does not enable the detection of microglial activation in AD.