Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

Validation of a new protocol for 18F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system

Authors: Michela Lecchi, Giovanni Lucignani, Claudio Maioli, Giuseppe Ignelzi, Angelo Del Sole

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In nuclear medicine, radiopharmaceuticals are usually administered in unit doses partitioned from multi-dose vials. The partitioning typically takes place in a radiopharmacy, depending on local practice. Automatic, as opposed to manual, partitioning and administration should reduce radiation exposure of the personnel involved, improve the accuracy of the administration and mitigate contamination. This study set out to verify and validate the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) administration procedure performed using Intego™ (MEDRAD, Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA), a combined dispenser and injector system. We considered maintenance of sterility and the system’s potential to improve, with respect to the manual procedure, the accuracy of net administered 18F-FDG radioactivity in patients and the radiation protection of operators.

Methods

A media-fill procedure was used to assess whether sterility is maintained during use of the Intego™ system. Simulating a typical working day’s setup and use of the system, we investigated the accuracy of the net administered 18F-FDG activity obtained with Intego™ versus the manual dose delivery system. We also measured personnel radiation exposure during use of Intego™ and during manual administration and recorded and compared environmental doses in the two conditions.

Results

The radiopharmaceutical remained sterile in all the tests performed. The accuracy of the net 18F-FDG activity delivered to the patients was found to be within 3 % points, as required by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines on 18F-FDG imaging procedures. With Intego™, the residual radioactivity in the tubing was 0.20 MBq, corresponding to approximately 0.07 % of the mean activity delivered. With manual injection, the residual radioactivity in the syringe averaged 7.37 MBq, corresponding to a mean error of 2.9 % in the delivered dose. During the injection step of the positron emission tomography (PET) procedure, whole-body and extremity radiation exposures were significantly reduced with Intego™ by 38 and by 94 %, respectively, compared to the levels associated with manual administration (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Intego™accurately partitions and administers sterile doses of 18F-FDG from multi-dose vials. Compared with standard manual 18F-FDG administration, the new procedure with an automatic dispensing and injection system greatly reduces the extremity dose to the operator involved in the administration of the radiopharmaceutical.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sirna V, Garaboldi L, Papi S, Martano L, Omodeo Salè E, Paganelli G, et al. Testing of microbial contamination during the preparation of the radiocompound [90Y]DOTATOC for clinical trials: a process validation study by Media Fill approach. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;54(5):553–9.PubMed Sirna V, Garaboldi L, Papi S, Martano L, Omodeo Salè E, Paganelli G, et al. Testing of microbial contamination during the preparation of the radiocompound [90Y]DOTATOC for clinical trials: a process validation study by Media Fill approach. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;54(5):553–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Biran T, Weininger J, Malchi S, Marciano R, Chisin R. Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans. Health Phys 2004;87(5):539–44.PubMedCrossRef Biran T, Weininger J, Malchi S, Marciano R, Chisin R. Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans. Health Phys 2004;87(5):539–44.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Benatar NA, Cronin BF, O’Doherty MJ. Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing PET: implications for technologists and waiting areas. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27(5):583–9.PubMedCrossRef Benatar NA, Cronin BF, O’Doherty MJ. Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing PET: implications for technologists and waiting areas. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27(5):583–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007;123(2):246–9.PubMedCrossRef Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007;123(2):246–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guillet B, Quentin P, Waultier S, Bourrelly M, Pisano P, Mundler OJ. Technologist radiation exposure in routine clinical practice with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(3):175–9.PubMed Guillet B, Quentin P, Waultier S, Bourrelly M, Pisano P, Mundler OJ. Technologist radiation exposure in routine clinical practice with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(3):175–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Covens P, Berus D, Vanhavere F, Caveliers V. The introduction of automated dispensing and injection during PET procedures: a step in the optimisation of extremity doses and whole-body doses of nuclear medicine staff. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;140(3):250–8.PubMedCrossRef Covens P, Berus D, Vanhavere F, Caveliers V. The introduction of automated dispensing and injection during PET procedures: a step in the optimisation of extremity doses and whole-body doses of nuclear medicine staff. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;140(3):250–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(1):181–200.PubMedCrossRef Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(1):181–200.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sans Merce M, Ruiz N, Barth I, Carnicer A, Donadille L, Ferrari P, et al. Extremity exposure in nuclear medicine: preliminary results of a European study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;144(1-4):515–20.PubMedCrossRef Sans Merce M, Ruiz N, Barth I, Carnicer A, Donadille L, Ferrari P, et al. Extremity exposure in nuclear medicine: preliminary results of a European study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;144(1-4):515–20.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zanzonico P, Dauer L, St Germain J. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities. Health Phys 2008;95:554–70.PubMedCrossRef Zanzonico P, Dauer L, St Germain J. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities. Health Phys 2008;95:554–70.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roberts FO, Gunawardana DH, Pathmaraj K, Wallace A, U PL, Mi T, et al. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(1):44–7.PubMed Roberts FO, Gunawardana DH, Pathmaraj K, Wallace A, U PL, Mi T, et al. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(1):44–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kop JMM, Kemerink GJ, Ollers MC, Pakbiers MTW. Optimisation of radiation protection as a result of PET/CT applications. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the IRPA, 19–24 October 2008. Available via www.irpa12.org.ar. Kop JMM, Kemerink GJ, Ollers MC, Pakbiers MTW. Optimisation of radiation protection as a result of PET/CT applications. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the IRPA, 19–24 October 2008. Available via www.​irpa12.​org.​ar.
12.
go back to reference Demir M, Demir B, Yaşar D, Sayman HB, Halac M, Ahmed AS, et al. Radiation doses to technologists working with 18F-FDG in a PET center with high patient capacity. Nukleonika 2010;55(1):107–12. Demir M, Demir B, Yaşar D, Sayman HB, Halac M, Ahmed AS, et al. Radiation doses to technologists working with 18F-FDG in a PET center with high patient capacity. Nukleonika 2010;55(1):107–12.
13.
go back to reference Tandon P, Venkatesh M, Bhatt BC. Extremity dosimetry for radiation workers handling unsealed radionuclides in nuclear medicine departments in India. Health Phys 2007;92(2):112–8.PubMedCrossRef Tandon P, Venkatesh M, Bhatt BC. Extremity dosimetry for radiation workers handling unsealed radionuclides in nuclear medicine departments in India. Health Phys 2007;92(2):112–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of a new protocol for 18F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system
Authors
Michela Lecchi
Giovanni Lucignani
Claudio Maioli
Giuseppe Ignelzi
Angelo Del Sole
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2174-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2012 Go to the issue