Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Original article

Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?

Authors: Pierre Vera, Matthieu John Ouvrier, Sébastien Hapdey, Marc Thillays, Anne Sophie Pesquet, Brigitte Diologent, Françoise Callonec, Anne Hitzel, Agathe Edet-Sanson, Jean François Ménard, Fabrice Jardin, Hervé Tilly

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In patients with lymphoma, we investigated the impact of contrast-enhanced CT on PET attenuation correction in lesions and normal tissues, particularly when PET/CT was performed after chemotherapy.

Methods

Fifty patients (51±18 years) with Hodgkin’s disease (n=17) or non-Hodgkin lymphomas (n=33) were studied before and after chemotherapy. PET/CT scans were performed 60 min after injection of FDG. Iopamiron 300 (iopamidol, 1.5 cc/kg) was injected immediately afterwards, followed 50 s later by a second craniocaudal CT (CT+). PET images were successively reconstructed using the unenhanced CT (PET−) and the CT+ (PET+) for attenuation correction, using iterative reconstruction (4 iterations, 8 subsets, 5 mm post-filtering). HUmean, SUVmax and SUVmean were measured before and after chemotherapy in ten non-tumoural ROIs [aorta, femur, kidney, lung, iliopsoas muscle, occipital cortex, T12 vertebra, liver, spleen and inferior vena cava (IVC)] and in tumoural lymphadenopathies or malignant tissues (n=397 and 51 VOIs respectively before and after chemotherapy) using a 3D-thresholding method (identical threshold for PET− and PET+). ROIs were defined on the PET− and automatically applied on the unenhanced CT (CT−), the CT+ and the PET+.

Results

In the non-tumoural tissues, HUmean increased significantly in the CT+ compared with the CT− in the vessels and the highly vascularised organs, and slight increases were observed in the occipital cortex (+11%), the iliopsoas muscle (+6%) and the femur (+3%). SUVmax increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET− in the aorta (+14%), the liver (+10%), the spleen (+10%) and the IVC (+12%). SUVmean increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET− in the aorta (+15%), the kidney (+13%), the liver (+11%), the spleen (10%) and the IVC (+12%). In the lesions, HUmean was not significantly different before and after chemotherapy, whatever the normal region considered. SUVmax increased significantly after treatment in the T12 vertebra (+12%). SUVmean increased significantly after treatment in the T12 vertebra (+13%) and in the liver (+12%). HUmean increased significantly in the CT+ compared with the CT− in the lesions (+55%) before chemotherapy. SUVmax and SUVmean increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET− in the lesions (+4%) only before chemotherapy. No significant difference was seen in measurements (HUmean, SUVmax and SUVmean) after chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that use of enhanced CT for attenuation correction has a negligible effect on quantification at staging and after chemotherapy. A “single-shot” enhanced PET/CT may thus be performed in the evaluation of patients with lymphoma at staging, during treatment and at follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1326–34.PubMed Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1326–34.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, et al. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 2005;106:1376–81.PubMedCrossRef Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, et al. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 2005;106:1376–81.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:52–9.PubMedCrossRef Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:52–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O’Doherty MJ, Timothy AR. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1514–23.PubMedCrossRef Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O’Doherty MJ, Timothy AR. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1514–23.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Groves AM, Owen KE, Courtney HM, Yates SJ, Goldstone KE, Blake GM, et al. 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol 2004;77:662–5.PubMedCrossRef Groves AM, Owen KE, Courtney HM, Yates SJ, Goldstone KE, Blake GM, et al. 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol 2004;77:662–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Moore WH, Bonvento M, Olivieri-Fitt R. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W498–W502.PubMedCrossRef Moore WH, Bonvento M, Olivieri-Fitt R. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W498–W502.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jessen K, Panzer W, Shrimpton P. EUR 16262. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxemburg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities; 2000. Jessen K, Panzer W, Shrimpton P. EUR 16262. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxemburg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Stattaus J, Jentzen W, Mueller SP, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1555–60.PubMed Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Stattaus J, Jentzen W, Mueller SP, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1555–60.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Yau YY, Chan WS, Tam YM, Vernon P, Wong S, Coel M, et al. Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error? J Nucl Med 2005;46:283–91.PubMed Yau YY, Chan WS, Tam YM, Vernon P, Wong S, Coel M, et al. Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error? J Nucl Med 2005;46:283–91.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mawlawi O, Erasmus JJ, Munden RF, Pan T, Knight AE, Macapinlac HA, et al. Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:308–19.PubMedCrossRef Mawlawi O, Erasmus JJ, Munden RF, Pan T, Knight AE, Macapinlac HA, et al. Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:308–19.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Hojgaard L. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167–75.PubMedCrossRef Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Hojgaard L. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167–75.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Vigil B, Gomez-Leon N, Pinilla I, Hernandez-Maraver D, Coya J, Martin-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed Rodriguez-Vigil B, Gomez-Leon N, Pinilla I, Hernandez-Maraver D, Coya J, Martin-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakamoto Y, Chin BB, Kraitchman DL, Lawler LP, Marshall LT, Wahl RL. Effects of nonionic intravenous contrast agents at PET/CT imaging: phantom and canine studies. Radiology 2003;227:817–24.PubMedCrossRef Nakamoto Y, Chin BB, Kraitchman DL, Lawler LP, Marshall LT, Wahl RL. Effects of nonionic intravenous contrast agents at PET/CT imaging: phantom and canine studies. Radiology 2003;227:817–24.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM, Imbriaco M, Yeung H, Finn R, et al. Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 1997;80:2505–9.PubMedCrossRef Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM, Imbriaco M, Yeung H, Finn R, et al. Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 1997;80:2505–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hany TF, Steinert HC, Goerres GW, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. PET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET−CT system: initial results. Radiology 2002;225:575–81.PubMedCrossRef Hany TF, Steinert HC, Goerres GW, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. PET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET−CT system: initial results. Radiology 2002;225:575–81.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Schutt P, Beyer T, Jentzen W, Muller SP, et al. FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:325–9.PubMedCrossRef Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Schutt P, Beyer T, Jentzen W, Muller SP, et al. FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:325–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Beyer T, Townsend DW, Blodgett TM. Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. Q J Nucl Med 2002;46:24–34.PubMed Beyer T, Townsend DW, Blodgett TM. Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. Q J Nucl Med 2002;46:24–34.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille M, Jerin J, et al. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:905–10.PubMedCrossRef Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille M, Jerin J, et al. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:905–10.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Israel O, Mor M, Gaitini D, Keidar Z, Guralnik L, Engel A, et al. Combined functional and structural evaluation of cancer patients with a hybrid camera-based PET/CT system using 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1129–36.PubMed Israel O, Mor M, Gaitini D, Keidar Z, Guralnik L, Engel A, et al. Combined functional and structural evaluation of cancer patients with a hybrid camera-based PET/CT system using 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1129–36.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Torizuka T, Nakamura F, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, Yoshikawa E, Okada H, et al. Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:22–8.PubMedCrossRef Torizuka T, Nakamura F, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, Yoshikawa E, Okada H, et al. Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:22–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:1773–82.PubMedCrossRef Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:1773–82.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, Von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:922–7.PubMedCrossRef Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, Von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:922–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weber WA. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med 2005;46:983–95.PubMed Weber WA. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med 2005;46:983–95.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of 18F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J Nucl Med 2004;45:784–8.PubMed Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of 18F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J Nucl Med 2004;45:784–8.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A, Stattaus J. Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005;46:429–35.PubMed Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A, Stattaus J. Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005;46:429–35.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, et al. Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2006;47:470–6.PubMed Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, et al. Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2006;47:470–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?
Authors
Pierre Vera
Matthieu John Ouvrier
Sébastien Hapdey
Marc Thillays
Anne Sophie Pesquet
Brigitte Diologent
Françoise Callonec
Anne Hitzel
Agathe Edet-Sanson
Jean François Ménard
Fabrice Jardin
Hervé Tilly
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0504-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2007 Go to the issue