Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2004

01-10-2004 | Original Article

Value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Authors: Akiko Suzuki, Tsuyoshi Kawano, Nobukazu Takahashi, Jin Lee, Yoshihiro Nakagami, Etsuko Miyagi, Fumiki Hirahara, Shinji Togo, Hiroshi Shimada, Tomio Inoue

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Peritoneal carcinomatosis can be difficult to diagnose using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of 2-(fluorine 18) fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Methods

We reviewed the CT and FDG PET radiological reports and clinical charts of 18 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and 17 cancer patients without peritoneal carcinomatosis. We also assessed FDG PET scans from 20 healthy volunteers as a baseline study. The maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) over peritoneal lesions in cancer patients and over the area of most intense intestinal uptake in healthy volunteers and cancer patients without peritoneal carcinomatosis were measured.

Results

The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of combined FDG PET and CT were superior to those of CT alone for the detection of peritoneal lesions (sensitivity: 66.7% vs 22.2%, p<0.025; PPV: 92.3% vs 50.0%, p<0.05). The most frequent pattern of FDG uptake in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis was abnormally intense focal uptake near the abdominal wall. An SUVmax threshold of 5.1 produced a diagnostic accuracy of combined FDG PET and CT of 78%. The additional information provided by FDG PET allowed a more accurate diagnosis in 14 patients (40.0%), and led to alteration of the therapeutic strategy in five (14.3%) of the enrolled cancer patients.

Conclusion

We found that use of an intra-abdominal FDG uptake cut-off value for SUVmax of >5.1 assists in the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. FDG PET may play an important role in the clinical management of patients with suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walkey MM, Friedman AC, Sohotra P, Radecki PD. CT manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1035–1041 Walkey MM, Friedman AC, Sohotra P, Radecki PD. CT manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1035–1041
2.
go back to reference Ha HK, Jung JI, Lee MS, Choi BG, Lee MG, Kim YH, Kim PN, Auh YH. CT differentiation of tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:743–748 Ha HK, Jung JI, Lee MS, Choi BG, Lee MG, Kim YH, Kim PN, Auh YH. CT differentiation of tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:743–748
3.
go back to reference Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Hoel MJ, Buck DR, Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: preoperative CT with intraperitoneal contrast material. Radiology 1992;182:133–138PubMed Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Hoel MJ, Buck DR, Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: preoperative CT with intraperitoneal contrast material. Radiology 1992;182:133–138PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 1993;72:1631–1636PubMed Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 1993;72:1631–1636PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chou CK, Liu GC, Chen LT, Jaw TS. MRI manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:336–338PubMed Chou CK, Liu GC, Chen LT, Jaw TS. MRI manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:336–338PubMed
7.
go back to reference Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Takakuwa H, Nishio A. Transvaginal versus transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:1381CrossRef Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Takakuwa H, Nishio A. Transvaginal versus transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:1381CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rioux M, Michaud C. Sonographic detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a prospective study of 37 cases. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:47–51; discussion 56–57PubMed Rioux M, Michaud C. Sonographic detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a prospective study of 37 cases. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:47–51; discussion 56–57PubMed
9.
go back to reference Goerg C, Schwerk WB. Malignant ascites: sonographic signs of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:720–723CrossRefPubMed Goerg C, Schwerk WB. Malignant ascites: sonographic signs of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:720–723CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I, Anderson JR. Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1260–1262CrossRefPubMed Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I, Anderson JR. Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1260–1262CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stocklin G. Efficient stereospecific synthesis of non-carrier-added 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 1986;27:235–238PubMed Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stocklin G. Efficient stereospecific synthesis of non-carrier-added 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 1986;27:235–238PubMed
12.
go back to reference Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics 2000;56:345–351CrossRefPubMed Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics 2000;56:345–351CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Inoue T, Koyama K, Oriuchi N, Alyafei S, Yuan Z, Suzuki H, Takeuchi K, Tomaru Y, Tomiyoshi K, Aoki J, Endo K. Detection of malignant tumors: whole-body PET with fluorine 18 α-methyl tyrosine versus FDG—preliminary study. Radiology 2001;220:54–62PubMed Inoue T, Koyama K, Oriuchi N, Alyafei S, Yuan Z, Suzuki H, Takeuchi K, Tomaru Y, Tomiyoshi K, Aoki J, Endo K. Detection of malignant tumors: whole-body PET with fluorine 18 α-methyl tyrosine versus FDG—preliminary study. Radiology 2001;220:54–62PubMed
14.
go back to reference Turlakow A, Yeung HW, Salmon AS, Macapinlac HA, Larson SM. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: role of 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1407–1412PubMed Turlakow A, Yeung HW, Salmon AS, Macapinlac HA, Larson SM. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: role of 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1407–1412PubMed
15.
go back to reference Drieskens O, Stroobants S, Gysen M, Vandenbosch G, Mortelmans L, Vergote I. Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;55:130–134CrossRefPubMed Drieskens O, Stroobants S, Gysen M, Vandenbosch G, Mortelmans L, Vergote I. Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;55:130–134CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Turlakow A, Yeung HW, Macapinlac HA, Nunez RF, Sanchez AF, Larson SM. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: the role of FDG-PET. J Nucl Med 2000; Suppl abstr:S36 Turlakow A, Yeung HW, Macapinlac HA, Nunez RF, Sanchez AF, Larson SM. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: the role of FDG-PET. J Nucl Med 2000; Suppl abstr:S36
17.
go back to reference Lin EC, Lear J, Quaife FA. Metastatic peritoneal seeding patterns demonstrated by FDG positron emission tomographic imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2001;26:249–250CrossRefPubMed Lin EC, Lear J, Quaife FA. Metastatic peritoneal seeding patterns demonstrated by FDG positron emission tomographic imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2001;26:249–250CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lin EC. “Straight line” sign of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis on sagittal FDG positron emission tomographic images. Clin Nucl Med 2002;27:735–736CrossRefPubMed Lin EC. “Straight line” sign of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis on sagittal FDG positron emission tomographic images. Clin Nucl Med 2002;27:735–736CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sheth S, Horton KM, Garland MR, Fishman EK. Mesenteric neoplasms: CT appearances of primary and secondary tumors and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2003;23:457–473PubMed Sheth S, Horton KM, Garland MR, Fishman EK. Mesenteric neoplasms: CT appearances of primary and secondary tumors and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2003;23:457–473PubMed
20.
go back to reference Healy JC, Reznek RH. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 1998;8:886–900PubMed Healy JC, Reznek RH. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 1998;8:886–900PubMed
21.
go back to reference Shreve PD, Bui CDH. Normal variants in FDG-PET imaging. In: Wahl RL, ed. Principles and practice of positron emission tomography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:111–136 Shreve PD, Bui CDH. Normal variants in FDG-PET imaging. In: Wahl RL, ed. Principles and practice of positron emission tomography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:111–136
22.
go back to reference Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Radiographics 2003;23:687–701PubMed Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Radiographics 2003;23:687–701PubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27:643–646PubMed Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27:643–646PubMed
25.
go back to reference Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, Mozley PD, Rossman MD, Albelda SM, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1412–1417PubMed Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, Mozley PD, Rossman MD, Albelda SM, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1412–1417PubMed
26.
go back to reference Smith GT, Hubner KF, McDonald T, Thie JA. Cost analysis of FDG PET for managing patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Positron Imaging 1999;2:63–70CrossRefPubMed Smith GT, Hubner KF, McDonald T, Thie JA. Cost analysis of FDG PET for managing patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Positron Imaging 1999;2:63–70CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Arulampalam T, Costa D, Visvikis D, Boulos P, Taylor I, Ell P. The impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1758–1765PubMed Arulampalam T, Costa D, Visvikis D, Boulos P, Taylor I, Ell P. The impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1758–1765PubMed
28.
go back to reference Saga T, Torizuka T, Ouchi Y, Nishizawa S, Yonekura Y, Ochi H, Miyama M, Shiomi S, Uno K, Konishi J, Torizuka K. Clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and follow up of patients with gynecological malignancies—an analysis based on multi-center survey. Radioisotopes 2003;52:11 Saga T, Torizuka T, Ouchi Y, Nishizawa S, Yonekura Y, Ochi H, Miyama M, Shiomi S, Uno K, Konishi J, Torizuka K. Clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and follow up of patients with gynecological malignancies—an analysis based on multi-center survey. Radioisotopes 2003;52:11
Metadata
Title
Value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis
Authors
Akiko Suzuki
Tsuyoshi Kawano
Nobukazu Takahashi
Jin Lee
Yoshihiro Nakagami
Etsuko Miyagi
Fumiki Hirahara
Shinji Togo
Hiroshi Shimada
Tomio Inoue
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2004
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1577-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2004

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2004 Go to the issue