Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2003

01-10-2003 | Original Article

Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer

Authors: B. Bagni, A. Franceschetto, A. Casolo, M. De Santis, I. Bagni, F. Pansini, C. Di Leo

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (99mTc-MIBI) scintimammography (SMM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast masses, using the histological findings as the gold standard. Forty-five consecutive patients with a breast lesion, detected by self-examination, physical examination or screening mammography, underwent SMM and MRI. In 38 cases (84.5%), the histopathology was malignant; the breast cancers ranged from 3 to 100 mm in diameter (mean 22 mm). In the overall patient group, MRI showed a slightly higher sensitivity than SMM (92% vs 84%), but SMM showed a better specificity: 71% vs 42%. The accuracy was 82% and 84% for SMM and MRI respectively. To evaluate the influence of lesion size on the results, patients with lesions ≤20 mm and ≤15 mm were examined. In patients with lesions ≤20 mm, the sensitivity of SMM and MRI decreased to 64% and 82% respectively, while SMM again displayed considerably better specificity: 83% vs 50% for MRI. The accuracy of SMM and MRI was 64% and 82% respectively. In patients with lesions ≤15 mm, SMM again showed better specificity (75% vs 50%), while MRI displayed better sensitivity and accuracy (sensitivity, 81% vs 62%; accuracy, 75% vs 65%). In this study the specificity of SMM in patients with breast lesions was thus superior to that of MRI. The combination of SMM and MRI may be used in those patients with equivocal findings at mammography and ultrasound to reduce the number of unnecessary surgical biopsies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–919.CrossRefPubMed Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–919.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers misses at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613–617.PubMed Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers misses at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613–617.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996; 276:33–38.CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996; 276:33–38.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kaiser JS, Helvie MA, Blacklaw RL, Roubidoux MA. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology 2002; 223:839–844.PubMed Kaiser JS, Helvie MA, Blacklaw RL, Roubidoux MA. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology 2002; 223:839–844.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Koukouraki S, Koukourakis MI, Vagios E, Velidaki A, Tsiftsis D, Karkavitsas N. The role of99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and color Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast lesions. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22:1243–1248.CrossRefPubMed Koukouraki S, Koukourakis MI, Vagios E, Velidaki A, Tsiftsis D, Karkavitsas N. The role of99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and color Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast lesions. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22:1243–1248.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ozdemir A, Ozdemir H, Maral I, Konus O, Yucel S, Isik S. Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesion: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:1091–1101; quiz 1102.PubMed Ozdemir A, Ozdemir H, Maral I, Konus O, Yucel S, Isik S. Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesion: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:1091–1101; quiz 1102.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Taylor KJ, Merrit C, Piccoli C, Schmidt R, Rouse G, Fornage B, Rubin E, Georgian-Smith D, Winsberg F, Goldberg B, Mendelson E. Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:19–26.CrossRefPubMed Taylor KJ, Merrit C, Piccoli C, Schmidt R, Rouse G, Fornage B, Rubin E, Georgian-Smith D, Winsberg F, Goldberg B, Mendelson E. Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:19–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rizzato G, Martegani A, Chersevani R, Macorig D, Vrtovec M, Aiani L, Tufarulo L. Importance of staging of breast cancer and role of contrast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 Suppl 3:47–51. Rizzato G, Martegani A, Chersevani R, Macorig D, Vrtovec M, Aiani L, Tufarulo L. Importance of staging of breast cancer and role of contrast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 Suppl 3:47–51.
9.
go back to reference Yang WT, Metreweli C, Lam PK, Chang J. Benign and malignant breast masses and axillary nodes: evaluation with echo-enhanced color power Doppler US. Radiology 2001; 220:795–802.PubMed Yang WT, Metreweli C, Lam PK, Chang J. Benign and malignant breast masses and axillary nodes: evaluation with echo-enhanced color power Doppler US. Radiology 2001; 220:795–802.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Boisserie-Lacroix M, Rauchon N. Contribution of high resolution breast ultrasonography in the characterization of ambiguous mammograms. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2002; 30:147–153.PubMed Boisserie-Lacroix M, Rauchon N. Contribution of high resolution breast ultrasonography in the characterization of ambiguous mammograms. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2002; 30:147–153.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Flobbe K, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38:1044–1050.CrossRefPubMed Flobbe K, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38:1044–1050.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baker DR. Magnetic resonance imaging of occult breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2000; 1:66–67.PubMed Baker DR. Magnetic resonance imaging of occult breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2000; 1:66–67.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kawashima H, Tawara M, Suzuki M, Matsui O, Kadoya M. Effectiveness of dynamic MRI for diagnosis pericicatricial minimal residual breast cancer following excisional biopsy. Eur J Radiol 2001; 40:2–9.CrossRefPubMed Kawashima H, Tawara M, Suzuki M, Matsui O, Kadoya M. Effectiveness of dynamic MRI for diagnosis pericicatricial minimal residual breast cancer following excisional biopsy. Eur J Radiol 2001; 40:2–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bone BK, Szabo B, Palko A, Aspelin P. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Orv Hetil 2001; 142:2123–2131.PubMed Bone BK, Szabo B, Palko A, Aspelin P. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Orv Hetil 2001; 142:2123–2131.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Murray AD, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, Ah-See AK, Brookes JA, Miller ID, Payne S. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes. Br J Radiol 2002; 75:220–228.PubMed Murray AD, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, Ah-See AK, Brookes JA, Miller ID, Payne S. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes. Br J Radiol 2002; 75:220–228.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Mena I, Jouanne E, Diggles L, Venegas R, Block J, Alle K, Klein S. Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:491–497.PubMed Khalkhali I, Mena I, Jouanne E, Diggles L, Venegas R, Block J, Alle K, Klein S. Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:491–497.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, Galski H, Fojo A, Willingham M, Lai SL, Gazdar A, Pirker R, Green A, Crist W, Brodeur GM. Expression of a multi-drug resistance gene in human cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81:116–120.PubMed Goldstein LJ, Galski H, Fojo A, Willingham M, Lai SL, Gazdar A, Pirker R, Green A, Crist W, Brodeur GM. Expression of a multi-drug resistance gene in human cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81:116–120.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Baum JK, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, Hanelin LG, Lugo CE, Taillefer R, Freeman LM, Neal CE, Scheff AM, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Houlihan MJ, Sampalis JS, Haber SB.99mTc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicentre study. Radiology 2002; 222:149–155.PubMed Khalkhali I, Baum JK, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, Hanelin LG, Lugo CE, Taillefer R, Freeman LM, Neal CE, Scheff AM, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Houlihan MJ, Sampalis JS, Haber SB.99mTc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicentre study. Radiology 2002; 222:149–155.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cayre A, Cachin F, Maublant J, Mestas D, Feillel V, Ferriere JP, Kwiaktowski F, Chevillard S, Finat-Duclos F, Verrelle P, Penault-Llorca F. Single static view99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is related to MDR expression. Int J Oncol 2002; 20:1049–1055. Cayre A, Cachin F, Maublant J, Mestas D, Feillel V, Ferriere JP, Kwiaktowski F, Chevillard S, Finat-Duclos F, Verrelle P, Penault-Llorca F. Single static view99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is related to MDR expression. Int J Oncol 2002; 20:1049–1055.
20.
go back to reference Mubashar M, Harrington KJ, Chaudhary KS, Lalani el-N, Stamp GW, Sinnett D, Glass DM, Peters AM.99mTc-sestamibi imaging in the assessment of toremifene as a modulator of multidrug resistance in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:519–525. Mubashar M, Harrington KJ, Chaudhary KS, Lalani el-N, Stamp GW, Sinnett D, Glass DM, Peters AM.99mTc-sestamibi imaging in the assessment of toremifene as a modulator of multidrug resistance in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:519–525.
21.
go back to reference Palmedo H. What can we expect from MDR breast cancer imaging with sestamibi? J Nucl Med 2002; 43:526–530.PubMed Palmedo H. What can we expect from MDR breast cancer imaging with sestamibi? J Nucl Med 2002; 43:526–530.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Michell MJ, Lawinksi C, The W, Vinnicombe S. The breast. In: Sutton D, ed. Texbook of radiology and imaging. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier Science; 2003:1451–1488. Michell MJ, Lawinksi C, The W, Vinnicombe S. The breast. In: Sutton D, ed. Texbook of radiology and imaging. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier Science; 2003:1451–1488.
23.
go back to reference Palmedo H, Grunwald F, Bender H, Schomburg A, Mallmann P, Krebs D, Biersack HJ. Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: comparison with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23:940–946.PubMed Palmedo H, Grunwald F, Bender H, Schomburg A, Mallmann P, Krebs D, Biersack HJ. Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: comparison with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23:940–946.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Tiling R, Khalkhali I, Sommer H, Moser R, Meyer G, Willemsen F, Pfluger T, Tatsch K, Kahn K. Role of technetium-99m-sestamibi scintimammography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of indeterminate mammograms. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24:1221–1229. Tiling R, Khalkhali I, Sommer H, Moser R, Meyer G, Willemsen F, Pfluger T, Tatsch K, Kahn K. Role of technetium-99m-sestamibi scintimammography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of indeterminate mammograms. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24:1221–1229.
25.
go back to reference Imbriaco M, Del Vecchio S, Riccardi A, Pace L, Di Salle F, Di Gennaro F, Salvatore M, Sodano A. Scintimammography with99mTc-MIBI versus dynamic MRI for non-invasive characterization of breast masses. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:56–63.CrossRefPubMed Imbriaco M, Del Vecchio S, Riccardi A, Pace L, Di Salle F, Di Gennaro F, Salvatore M, Sodano A. Scintimammography with99mTc-MIBI versus dynamic MRI for non-invasive characterization of breast masses. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:56–63.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Kieper DA, Majewski S, Goodman S, Civelek C. High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:909–915.PubMed Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Kieper DA, Majewski S, Goodman S, Civelek C. High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:909–915.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer
Authors
B. Bagni
A. Franceschetto
A. Casolo
M. De Santis
I. Bagni
F. Pansini
C. Di Leo
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2003
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1262-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2003

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2003 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Reply