Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Technical Report

Chemical shift imaging at 3 Tesla: effect of echo time on assessing bone marrow abnormalities

Authors: F. Del Grande, Ty Subhawong, A. Flammang, L. M. Fayad

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Our purpose is to test the effect of varied in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) sequence order on characterizing marrow signal changes at 3T.

Materials and methods

The study was HIPAA compliant and IRB approved. Informed consent was waived. At 3T, IP and OP sequences were acquired in three patients with biopsy-proven osteosarcomas, using two methods: approach 1 (OP acquisition before IP acquisition) and approach 2 (OP after IP). Signal intensity (SI) measurements in 12 locations of biopsy-proven osteosarcoma and in six locations with normal bone marrow were performed independently by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) was measured within the marrow where there was T1 signal lower than skeletal muscle. A SIR < 20 % on the OP compared with IP imaging was considered positive for marrow replacement, while SIR > = 20 % was considered negative. Interobserver agreement was measured by the Lin concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

Results

In 75 % (18/24) of locations within the biopsy-proven tumors, the SIR was >20 % (SI drop more than 20 % in OP compared to IP) using approach 2 and in 100 % (24/24) of the locations the SIR was <20 % (SI drop less than 20 % in OP compared to IP) using approach 1, indicating a high percentage of false-negative results by approach 2, and no false-negative results with approach 1. There was good agreement between observer measurement (CCC = 0.96).

Conclusions

At 3T, the OP sequence should be acquired prior to the IP sequence, because susceptibility artifacts on a later-acquired OP sequence may lead to an erroneous interpretation of marrow signal abnormalities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krebs TL, Wagner BJ. MR imaging of the adrenal gland: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1998;18:1425–40.PubMedCrossRef Krebs TL, Wagner BJ. MR imaging of the adrenal gland: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1998;18:1425–40.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C, Ortori S, Bruschini L, Bartolozzi C. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1811–8. doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1229-6.PubMedCrossRef Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C, Ortori S, Bruschini L, Bartolozzi C. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1811–8. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-001-1229-6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK. The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1183–8.PubMed Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK. The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1183–8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Schindera ST, Soher BJ, Delong DM, Dale BM, Merkle EM. Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2008;248:140–7. doi:10.1148/radiol.2481071069.PubMedCrossRef Schindera ST, Soher BJ, Delong DM, Dale BM, Merkle EM. Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2008;248:140–7. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2481071069.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zajick Jr DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology. 2005;237:590–6. doi:10.1148/radiol.2372040990.PubMedCrossRef Zajick Jr DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology. 2005;237:590–6. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2372040990.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, Kesack CD, Cooper JA. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1439–47.PubMedCrossRef Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, Kesack CD, Cooper JA. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1439–47.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1524–32.PubMedCrossRef Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1524–32.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsushima Y, Dean PB. Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift MR imaging: how to select echo times. Radiology. 1995;195:285–6.PubMed Tsushima Y, Dean PB. Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift MR imaging: how to select echo times. Radiology. 1995;195:285–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Chemical shift imaging at 3 Tesla: effect of echo time on assessing bone marrow abnormalities
Authors
F. Del Grande
Ty Subhawong
A. Flammang
L. M. Fayad
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1883-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Skeletal Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Foot drop after a suicide attempt