Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Scientific Article

Valid MR imaging predictors of prior knee arthroscopy

Authors: Federico Discepola, John S. Park, Paul Clopton, Andrew N. Knoll, Matthew J. Austin, Huy B. Q. Le, Donald L. Resnick

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether fibrosis of the medial patellar reticulum (MPR), lateral patellar reticulum (LPR), deep medial aspect of Hoffa’s fat pad (MDH), or deep lateral aspect of Hoffa’s fat pad (LDH) is a valid predictor of prior knee arthroscopy.

Materials and methods

Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPPA-compliant study. Initially, fibrosis of the MPR, LPR, MDH, or LDH in MR imaging studies of 50 patients with prior knee arthroscopy and 100 patients without was recorded. Subsequently, two additional radiologists, blinded to clinical data, retrospectively and independently recorded the presence of fibrosis of the MPR in 50 patients with prior knee arthroscopy and 50 without. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for detecting the presence of fibrosis in the MPR were calculated. κ statistics were used to analyze inter-observer agreement.

Results

Fibrosis of each of the regions examined during the first portion of the study showed a significant association with prior knee arthroscopy (p < 0.005 for each). A patient with fibrosis of the MPR, LDH, or LPR was 45.5, 9, or 3.7 times more likely, respectively, to have had a prior knee arthroscopy. Logistic regression analysis indicated that fibrosis of the MPR supplanted the diagnostic utility of identifying fibrosis of the LPR, LDH, or MDH, or combinations of these (p ≥ 0.09 for all combinations). In the second portion of the study, fibrosis of the MPR demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 72%, PPV of 75%, NPV of 81%, and accuracy of 77% for predicting prior knee arthroscopy.

Conclusions

Analysis of MR images can be used to determine if a patient has had prior knee arthroscopy by identifying fibrosis of the MPR, LPR, MDH, or LDH. Fibrosis of the MPR was the strongest predictor of prior knee arthroscopy.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2002;22:765–74.PubMed Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2002;22:765–74.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fox MG. MR imaging of the meniscus: review, current trends, and clinical implications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:1033–53.PubMedCrossRef Fox MG. MR imaging of the meniscus: review, current trends, and clinical implications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:1033–53.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference White LM, Schweitzer ME, Weishaupt D, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography. Radiology. 2002;222:421–9.PubMedCrossRef White LM, Schweitzer ME, Weishaupt D, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography. Radiology. 2002;222:421–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vance K, Meredick R, Schweitzer ME, Lubowitz JH. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:522–30.PubMedCrossRef Vance K, Meredick R, Schweitzer ME, Lubowitz JH. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:522–30.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Wickiewicz TL. Arthroscopic portal placement. Tech Knee Surg. 2004;3(1):2–7.CrossRef Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Wickiewicz TL. Arthroscopic portal placement. Tech Knee Surg. 2004;3(1):2–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Whipple TL, Bassett FH. Arthroscopic examination of the knee. Polypuncture technique with percutaneous intra-articular manipulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(4):444–53.PubMed Whipple TL, Bassett FH. Arthroscopic examination of the knee. Polypuncture technique with percutaneous intra-articular manipulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(4):444–53.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Treuting R. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: arthroscopy. Ochsner J. 2000;2(3):158–63.PubMed Treuting R. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: arthroscopy. Ochsner J. 2000;2(3):158–63.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Saddick D, McNally EG, Richardson M. MRI of Hoffa’s fat pad. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(8):433–44. Saddick D, McNally EG, Richardson M. MRI of Hoffa’s fat pad. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(8):433–44.
10.
go back to reference Steadman JR, Dragoo JL, Hines SL, Briggs KK. Arthroscopic release for symptomatic scarring of the anterior interval of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1763–9.PubMedCrossRef Steadman JR, Dragoo JL, Hines SL, Briggs KK. Arthroscopic release for symptomatic scarring of the anterior interval of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1763–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Valid MR imaging predictors of prior knee arthroscopy
Authors
Federico Discepola
John S. Park
Paul Clopton
Andrew N. Knoll
Matthew J. Austin
Huy B. Q. Le
Donald L. Resnick
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1121-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Skeletal Radiology 1/2012 Go to the issue