Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Scientific Article

Validation of phalanx bone three-dimensional surface segmentation from computed tomography images using laser scanning

Authors: Nicole A. DeVries, Esther E. Gassman, Nicole A. Kallemeyn, Kiran H. Shivanna, Vincent A. Magnotta, Nicole M. Grosland

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To examine the validity of manually defined bony regions of interest from computed tomography (CT) scans.

Materials and methods

Segmentation measurements were performed on the coronal reformatted CT images of the three phalanx bones of the index finger from five cadaveric specimens. Two smoothing algorithms (image-based and Laplacian surface-based) were evaluated to determine their ability to represent accurately the anatomic surface. The resulting surfaces were compared with laser surface scans of the corresponding cadaveric specimen.

Results

The average relative overlap between two tracers was 0.91 for all bones. The overall mean difference between the manual unsmoothed surface and the laser surface scan was 0.20 mm. Both image-based and Laplacian surface-based smoothing were compared; the overall mean difference for image-based smoothing was 0.21 mm and 0.20 mm for Laplacian smoothing.

Conclusions

This study showed that manual segmentation of high-contrast, coronal, reformatted, CT datasets can accurately represent the true surface geometry of bones. Additionally, smoothing techniques did not significantly alter the surface representations. This validation technique should be extended to other bones, image segmentation and spatial filtering techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaney E, Ibbott G. Methods for image segmentation should be standardized and calibrated. Med Phys 2005; 32: 3507–3510.PubMedCrossRef Chaney E, Ibbott G. Methods for image segmentation should be standardized and calibrated. Med Phys 2005; 32: 3507–3510.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M. Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001). Utretcht, Netherlands. Springer; 2001. Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M. Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001). Utretcht, Netherlands. Springer; 2001.
3.
go back to reference Rao M, Stough J, Chi YY, et al. Comparison of human and automatic segmentations of kidneys from CT images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 954–960.PubMedCrossRef Rao M, Stough J, Chi YY, et al. Comparison of human and automatic segmentations of kidneys from CT images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 954–960.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Spinks R, Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, et al. Manual and automated measurement of the whole thalamus and mediodorsal nucleus using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 631–642.PubMedCrossRef Spinks R, Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, et al. Manual and automated measurement of the whole thalamus and mediodorsal nucleus using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 631–642.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Validation of image segmentation and expert quality with an expectation-maximization algorithm. in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image and Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002). Tokyo, Japan. Springer; 2002. Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Validation of image segmentation and expert quality with an expectation-maximization algorithm. in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image and Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002). Tokyo, Japan. Springer; 2002.
6.
go back to reference Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23: 903–921.PubMedCrossRef Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23: 903–921.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zou KH, Warfield SK, Bharatha A, et al. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 178–189.PubMedCrossRef Zou KH, Warfield SK, Bharatha A, et al. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 178–189.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zou KH, Wells WM 3rd, Kikinis R, Warfield SK. Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1259–1282.PubMedCrossRef Zou KH, Wells WM 3rd, Kikinis R, Warfield SK. Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1259–1282.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chiarot CB, Siewerdsen JH, Haycocks T, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA. An innovative phantom for quantitative and qualitative investigation of advanced x-ray imaging technologies. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: N287–N297.PubMedCrossRef Chiarot CB, Siewerdsen JH, Haycocks T, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA. An innovative phantom for quantitative and qualitative investigation of advanced x-ray imaging technologies. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: N287–N297.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Collins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Kollokian V, et al. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 463–468.PubMedCrossRef Collins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Kollokian V, et al. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 463–468.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ward RC, Yambert MW, Toedte RJ, et al. Creating a human phantom for the virtual human program. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 70: 368–374.PubMed Ward RC, Yambert MW, Toedte RJ, et al. Creating a human phantom for the virtual human program. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 70: 368–374.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld J, Waterton J, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14(A): A46–A75.PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld J, Waterton J, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14(A): A46–A75.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ratiu P, Hillen B, Glaser J, Jenkins DP. Visible Human 2.0–the next generation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 275–281.PubMed Ratiu P, Hillen B, Glaser J, Jenkins DP. Visible Human 2.0–the next generation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 275–281.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Spitzer V, Ackerman MJ, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 118–130.PubMed Spitzer V, Ackerman MJ, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 118–130.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG. The Visible Human Dataset: the anatomical platform for human simulation. Anat Rec 1998; 253: 49–57.PubMedCrossRef Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG. The Visible Human Dataset: the anatomical platform for human simulation. Anat Rec 1998; 253: 49–57.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Vannier M. Toward a common validation methodology for segmentation and registration algorithms. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Springer; 2000. Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Vannier M. Toward a common validation methodology for segmentation and registration algorithms. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Springer; 2000.
17.
go back to reference Cohen Z, McCarthy D, Kwak S, et al. Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 95–109.PubMedCrossRef Cohen Z, McCarthy D, Kwak S, et al. Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 95–109.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Neu CP, Crisco JJ, Wolfe SW. In vivo kinematic behavior of the radio-capitate joint during wrist flexion-extension and radio-ulnar deviation. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1429–1438.PubMedCrossRef Neu CP, Crisco JJ, Wolfe SW. In vivo kinematic behavior of the radio-capitate joint during wrist flexion-extension and radio-ulnar deviation. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1429–1438.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Andreasen NC, Cohen G, Harris G, et al. Image processing for the study of brain structure and function: problems and programs. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 04: 125–133. Andreasen NC, Cohen G, Harris G, et al. Image processing for the study of brain structure and function: problems and programs. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 04: 125–133.
20.
go back to reference Magnotta VA, Harris G, Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Yuh WTC, Heckle D. Structural MR image processing using the BRAINS2 toolbox. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002; 26: 251–264.PubMedCrossRef Magnotta VA, Harris G, Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Yuh WTC, Heckle D. Structural MR image processing using the BRAINS2 toolbox. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002; 26: 251–264.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Donahue TLH, Hull ML, Rashid MM, Jacobs CR. A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124: 273–280.PubMedCrossRef Donahue TLH, Hull ML, Rashid MM, Jacobs CR. A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124: 273–280.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference PIXform 2001 tutorial. 2001, Roland DG Corporation. PIXform 2001 tutorial. 2001, Roland DG Corporation.
23.
go back to reference Sharp GC, Lee SW, Wehe DK. Invariant features and the registration of rigid bodies. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1999. Detroit, Michigan. IEEE; 1999. Sharp GC, Lee SW, Wehe DK. Invariant features and the registration of rigid bodies. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1999. Detroit, Michigan. IEEE; 1999.
24.
go back to reference Danielsson PE. Euclidean distance mapping. Comput Graph Image Process 1980; 14: 227–248.CrossRef Danielsson PE. Euclidean distance mapping. Comput Graph Image Process 1980; 14: 227–248.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–310. Bland JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–310.
26.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 433–441.PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 433–441.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeir F, Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 811–816.PubMedCrossRef Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeir F, Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 811–816.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of phalanx bone three-dimensional surface segmentation from computed tomography images using laser scanning
Authors
Nicole A. DeVries
Esther E. Gassman
Nicole A. Kallemeyn
Kiran H. Shivanna
Vincent A. Magnotta
Nicole M. Grosland
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0386-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Skeletal Radiology 1/2008 Go to the issue

Browser's Notes

Browser’s notes