Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Scientific Article

Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee

Authors: M. H. Brem, J. Pauser, H. Yoshioka, A. Brenning, J. Stratmann, F. F. Hennig, R. Kikinis, J. Duryea, C. S. Winalski, P. Lang

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface area measurements in moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Materials and methods

We analysed 5 MRI (GE 1.5T, sagittal 3D SPGR) data sets of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee (Kellgren Lawrence grade I–II). Two scans were performed: one baseline scan and one follow-up scan 3 months later (96 ± 10 days). For segmentation, 3D Slicer 2.5 software was used. Two segmentations were performed by two readers independently who were blinded to the scan dates. Tibial and femoral cartilage volume and surface were determined. Longitudinal and cross-sectional precision errors were calculated using the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV%=100×[SD/mean]) from the repeated measurements in each patient. The in vivo reproducibility was then calculated as the root mean square of these individual reproducibility errors.

Results

The cross-sectional root mean squared coefficient of variation (RMSE-CV) was 1.2, 2.2 and 2.4% for surface area measurements (femur, medial and lateral tibia respectively) and 1.4, 1.8 and 1.3% for the corresponding cartilage volumes. Longitudinal RMSE-CV was 3.3, 3.1 and 3.7% for the surface area measurements (femur, medial and lateral tibia respectively) and 2.3, 3.3 and 2.4% for femur, medial and lateral tibia cartilage volumes.

Conclusion

The longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage surface and volume measurements in the knee using this segmentation method is excellent. To the best of our knowledge we measured, for the first time, the longitudinal reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface area in participants with mild to moderate OA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cisternas M, Yelin E, Trupin L, Murphy L, Helmick CG. Direct and indirect costs of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions—United States, 1997. Report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 21, 2003. Cisternas M, Yelin E, Trupin L, Murphy L, Helmick CG. Direct and indirect costs of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions—United States, 1997. Report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 21, 2003.
2.
go back to reference Pientka L. Arthrose als Volkskrankheit. Klin Forsch 2000;6 Suppl:2:2–3. Pientka L. Arthrose als Volkskrankheit. Klin Forsch 2000;6 Suppl:2:2–3.
3.
go back to reference Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165 (2):377–82.PubMed Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165 (2):377–82.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, Glüer CC, Namba R, Majumdar S et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994;192 (2):485–91.PubMed Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, Glüer CC, Namba R, Majumdar S et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994;192 (2):485–91.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Wluka AE, Stuckey S, Snaddon J, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46 (8):2065–72.PubMedCrossRef Wluka AE, Stuckey S, Snaddon J, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46 (8):2065–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 2000;18 (4):580–4.PubMedCrossRef Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 2000;18 (4):580–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 1999;7 (3):265–71.PubMedCrossRef Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 1999;7 (3):265–71.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, Maag KP, Haubner M, Faber S et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170 (3):593–7.PubMed Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, Maag KP, Haubner M, Faber S et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170 (3):593–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Heudorfer L, Faber SC, Burgkart R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10 (12):922–8.PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Heudorfer L, Faber SC, Burgkart R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10 (12):922–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Charles HC, Buck RJ, Kraus VB, Remmers AE, Hudelmaier M et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52 (10):3132–6.PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Charles HC, Buck RJ, Kraus VB, Remmers AE, Hudelmaier M et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52 (10):3132–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Lang P. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004;231 (1):31–8.PubMed Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Lang P. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004;231 (1):31–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Loresen We, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorithm. Comput Graph (ACM) 1987; 21(4):163–9.CrossRef Loresen We, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorithm. Comput Graph (ACM) 1987; 21(4):163–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sommerville DMY. Analytical geometry of three dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1959. Sommerville DMY. Analytical geometry of three dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1959.
14.
go back to reference Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995;5 (4):262–70.PubMedCrossRef Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995;5 (4):262–70.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Stuckey SL. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50 (1):94–7.PubMedCrossRef Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Stuckey SL. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50 (1):94–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Michaelis M, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17 (7):1033–42.PubMedCrossRef Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Michaelis M, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17 (7):1033–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kshirsagar AA, Watson PJ, Tyler JA, Hall LD. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiol 1998;33 (5):289–99.PubMedCrossRef Kshirsagar AA, Watson PJ, Tyler JA, Hall LD. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiol 1998;33 (5):289–99.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee
Authors
M. H. Brem
J. Pauser
H. Yoshioka
A. Brenning
J. Stratmann
F. F. Hennig
R. Kikinis
J. Duryea
C. S. Winalski
P. Lang
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0208-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Skeletal Radiology 4/2007 Go to the issue