Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2006

01-11-2006 | Scientific Article

Pattern of osteophytes and enthesophytes in the proximal ulna: an anatomic, paleopathologic, and radiologic study

Authors: A. Esposito, S. C. L. Souto, O. A. Catalano, A. S. Doria, P. B. S. Trigo, D. Resnick

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To develop a schematic segmentation of the proximal ulna in order to detect, assess the frequency, and characterize the bony outgrowths arising from the trochlea and from the radial notch of the ulna, to enable differentiation of osteophytes from enthesophytes.

Materials and methods

Eighty well-preserved ulna specimens from the collection of the San Diego Museum of Man were analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The trochlea and the radial notch of the ulna simulate the shape of a clock quadrant. The proximal ulna was divided into 24 anatomic areas. The relationships of the joint capsule and insertions of tendons and ligaments onto these area were assessed by the two readers, and the resulting appearances of bony outgrowths were compared at visual inspection and on Radiographs.

Results

The interobserver visual comparison was good in 17 areas out of 24, but poor correlation was found in 7 areas. In one case, difficulties in differentiating osteophytes originating from the brachialis muscle/ tendon (area 9) from an enthesophyte originating from the capsule insertion on the coronoid process (areas 2 or 3) occurredand between two different enthesophytes in a further case. Five cases had difficulties in defining differences in the grading system of the outgrowths. The percentage of outgrowths observed in each of the areas was globally high, especially in areas 9 and 10. On radiographs it was possible to observe irregularities in ten areas; in eight at a threshold of height of 2 mm (areas 1-4, 9, 10, 11, 14) and in two at a threshold of height of 3 mm (areas 5, 6). The two readers had the same difficulties in differentiating enthesophytes from osteophytes at radiographic and visual examination.

Conclusion

Our segmentation scheme is reproducible and objective, and permitted the differentiation of the bony outgrowths arising from the proximal ulna into osteophytes and enthesophytes, which may be particularly useful for the in vivo assessment of abnormalities seen in elbow overuse syndromes.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference David TS. Medial elbow pain in the throwing athlete. Orthopedics 2003;26:94–103PubMed David TS. Medial elbow pain in the throwing athlete. Orthopedics 2003;26:94–103PubMed
3.
go back to reference Schickendantz MS. Diagnosis and treatment of elbow disorders in the overhead athlete. Hand Clin 2002;18:65–75CrossRefPubMed Schickendantz MS. Diagnosis and treatment of elbow disorders in the overhead athlete. Hand Clin 2002;18:65–75CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Moskal MJ. Arthroscopic treatment of posterior impingement of the elbow in athletes. Clin Sports Medicine 2001;20:11–24CrossRef Moskal MJ. Arthroscopic treatment of posterior impingement of the elbow in athletes. Clin Sports Medicine 2001;20:11–24CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rizio L, Uribe JW. Overuse injures of the upper extremity in baseball. Clin Sports Medicine 2001;20:453–468CrossRef Rizio L, Uribe JW. Overuse injures of the upper extremity in baseball. Clin Sports Medicine 2001;20:453–468CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rogers J, Shepstone L, Dieppe P. Bone formers: osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are positively associated. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:85–90PubMedCrossRef Rogers J, Shepstone L, Dieppe P. Bone formers: osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are positively associated. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:85–90PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kindynis P, Haller J, Kang HS, Resnick D, Sartoris DJ, Trudell D, Tyson R. Osteophytosis of the knee: anatomic, radiologic, and pathologic investigation. Radiology 1990;174:841–846PubMed Kindynis P, Haller J, Kang HS, Resnick D, Sartoris DJ, Trudell D, Tyson R. Osteophytosis of the knee: anatomic, radiologic, and pathologic investigation. Radiology 1990;174:841–846PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hernborg J, Nilsson N. The relationship between osteoarthritis in the knee joint, osteophyte and aging. Acta Orthop Scand 1973;44:69–74PubMedCrossRef Hernborg J, Nilsson N. The relationship between osteoarthritis in the knee joint, osteophyte and aging. Acta Orthop Scand 1973;44:69–74PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Moskowitz RW, Goldberg VM. Studies of osteophyte pathogenesis in experimentally induced osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:311–320PubMed Moskowitz RW, Goldberg VM. Studies of osteophyte pathogenesis in experimentally induced osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:311–320PubMed
10.
go back to reference Benjamin M, Rufai A, Ralphs JR. The mechanism of formation of bony spurs (enthesophytes) in the Achilles tendon. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2000;43:576–583CrossRefPubMed Benjamin M, Rufai A, Ralphs JR. The mechanism of formation of bony spurs (enthesophytes) in the Achilles tendon. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2000;43:576–583CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Resnick D, Niwayama G. Entheses and Enthesopathy. Radiology 1983;146:1–9PubMed Resnick D, Niwayama G. Entheses and Enthesopathy. Radiology 1983;146:1–9PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rogers J, Watt I, Dieppe P. Comparison of visual and radiographic detection of bony changes at the knee joint. Br Med J 1990;300:367–368CrossRef Rogers J, Watt I, Dieppe P. Comparison of visual and radiographic detection of bony changes at the knee joint. Br Med J 1990;300:367–368CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pattern of osteophytes and enthesophytes in the proximal ulna: an anatomic, paleopathologic, and radiologic study
Authors
A. Esposito
S. C. L. Souto
O. A. Catalano
A. S. Doria
P. B. S. Trigo
D. Resnick
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0134-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

Skeletal Radiology 11/2006 Go to the issue