Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 4/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Review

Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice

Authors: Owen J. Arthurs, Andrew M. Taylor, Neil J. Sebire

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Just as there is a range of paediatric imaging techniques available during life, a similar repertoire is available as part of the foetal and perinatal postmortem examination. In this article, we review the literature regarding the diagnostic utility of postmortem radiography, US, CT and MRI in this clinical setting. There is limited direct evidence on the diagnostic utility of any of these techniques, apart from postmortem MRI, which when combined with other noninvasive investigations, has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for many foetal postmortem diagnoses. The main disadvantages of postmortem MRI include the longer duration of imaging, the need for appropriate training in the interpretation of normal postmortem changes, and possible non-diagnostic imaging examinations in early gestation foetuses. As less-invasive autopsy becomes increasingly available, the true utility of these techniques will evolve, and clinical guidelines for maximal diagnostic yield can be developed.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, van Rijn RR (2010) Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol 40:141–152CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, van Rijn RR (2010) Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol 40:141–152CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G et al (2011) Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 118:1–203PubMed Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G et al (2011) Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 118:1–203PubMed
5.
go back to reference Vogt C, Blaas HG, Salvesen KÅ et al (2012) Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:666–672CrossRefPubMed Vogt C, Blaas HG, Salvesen KÅ et al (2012) Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:666–672CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Arthurs OJ, van Rijn RR, Sebire NJ (2014) Current status of paediatric post-mortem imaging: an ESPR questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol 44:244–251CrossRefPubMed Arthurs OJ, van Rijn RR, Sebire NJ (2014) Current status of paediatric post-mortem imaging: an ESPR questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol 44:244–251CrossRefPubMed
7.
9.
go back to reference Wright C, Lee RE (2004) Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F285–F288CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wright C, Lee RE (2004) Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F285–F288CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hughes Roberts Y, Arthurs OJ, Moss HM et al (2012) Post-mortem skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental injury. Clin Radiol 67:868–876CrossRefPubMed Hughes Roberts Y, Arthurs OJ, Moss HM et al (2012) Post-mortem skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental injury. Clin Radiol 67:868–876CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Foote GA, Wilson AJ, Stewart JH (1978) Perinatal post-mortem radiography — experience with 2,500 cases. Br J Radiol 51:351–356CrossRefPubMed Foote GA, Wilson AJ, Stewart JH (1978) Perinatal post-mortem radiography — experience with 2,500 cases. Br J Radiol 51:351–356CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cremin BJ, Draper R (1981) The value of radiography in perinatal deaths. Pediatr Radiol 11:143–146CrossRefPubMed Cremin BJ, Draper R (1981) The value of radiography in perinatal deaths. Pediatr Radiol 11:143–146CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kalifa G, Barbet JP, Labbe F et al (1989) Value of systematic post mortem radiographic examinations of fetuses — 400 cases. Pediatr Radiol 19:111–113CrossRefPubMed Kalifa G, Barbet JP, Labbe F et al (1989) Value of systematic post mortem radiographic examinations of fetuses — 400 cases. Pediatr Radiol 19:111–113CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bourlière-Najean B, Russel AS, Panuel M et al (2003) Value of fetal skeletal radiographs in the diagnosis of fetal death. Eur Radiol 13:1046–1049PubMed Bourlière-Najean B, Russel AS, Panuel M et al (2003) Value of fetal skeletal radiographs in the diagnosis of fetal death. Eur Radiol 13:1046–1049PubMed
15.
go back to reference Olsen O, Espeland A, Maartman-Moe H et al (2003) Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F521–F524CrossRefPubMedCentral Olsen O, Espeland A, Maartman-Moe H et al (2003) Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F521–F524CrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Arthurs OJ, Calder AC, Kiho L et al (2014) Routine perinatal and paediatric post-mortem radiography: detection rates and practice implications. Pediatr Radiol 44:252–257CrossRefPubMed Arthurs OJ, Calder AC, Kiho L et al (2014) Routine perinatal and paediatric post-mortem radiography: detection rates and practice implications. Pediatr Radiol 44:252–257CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Charlier P, Chaillot PF, Watier L et al (2013) Is post-mortem ultrasonography a useful tool for forensic purposes? Med Sci Law 3:227–234CrossRef Charlier P, Chaillot PF, Watier L et al (2013) Is post-mortem ultrasonography a useful tool for forensic purposes? Med Sci Law 3:227–234CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Breeze ACG, Jessop FA, Whitehead AL et al (2008) Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 452:201–207CrossRefPubMed Breeze ACG, Jessop FA, Whitehead AL et al (2008) Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 452:201–207CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Garg S, Basu S, Mohan H et al (2009) Comparison of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 28:139–150CrossRefPubMed Garg S, Basu S, Mohan H et al (2009) Comparison of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 28:139–150CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fariña J, Millana C, Fdez-Aceñero J et al (2002) Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 440:635–639CrossRefPubMed Fariña J, Millana C, Fdez-Aceñero J et al (2002) Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 440:635–639CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW et al (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW et al (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ruder TD, Hatch GM, Ebert LC et al (2012) Whole body postmortem magnetic resonance angiography. J Forensic Sci 57:778–782CrossRefPubMed Ruder TD, Hatch GM, Ebert LC et al (2012) Whole body postmortem magnetic resonance angiography. J Forensic Sci 57:778–782CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference O'Donoghue K, O'Regan KN, Sheridan CP et al (2012) Investigation of the role of computed tomography as an adjunct to autopsy in the evaluation of stillbirth. Eur J Radiol 81:1667–1675CrossRefPubMed O'Donoghue K, O'Regan KN, Sheridan CP et al (2012) Investigation of the role of computed tomography as an adjunct to autopsy in the evaluation of stillbirth. Eur J Radiol 81:1667–1675CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sakurai T, Michiue T, Ishikawa T et al (2012) Postmortem CT investigation of skeletal and dental maturation of the fetuses and newborn infants: a serial case study. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:351–357CrossRefPubMed Sakurai T, Michiue T, Ishikawa T et al (2012) Postmortem CT investigation of skeletal and dental maturation of the fetuses and newborn infants: a serial case study. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:351–357CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Proisy M, Marchand AJ, Loget P et al (2013) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy in the investigation of unexpected death in infants and children. Eur Radiol 23:1711–1719CrossRefPubMed Proisy M, Marchand AJ, Loget P et al (2013) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy in the investigation of unexpected death in infants and children. Eur Radiol 23:1711–1719CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Oyake Y, Aoki T, Shiotani S et al (2006) Postmortem computed tomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children: retrospective review of cases. Radiat Med 24:493–502CrossRefPubMed Oyake Y, Aoki T, Shiotani S et al (2006) Postmortem computed tomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children: retrospective review of cases. Radiat Med 24:493–502CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B et al (2011) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med 125:791–802CrossRefPubMed Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B et al (2011) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med 125:791–802CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bruguier C, Mosimann PJ, Vaucher P et al (2013) Multi-phase postmortem CT angiography: recognizing technique-related artefacts and pitfalls. Int J Legal Med 127:639–652CrossRefPubMed Bruguier C, Mosimann PJ, Vaucher P et al (2013) Multi-phase postmortem CT angiography: recognizing technique-related artefacts and pitfalls. Int J Legal Med 127:639–652CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Votino C, Cannie M, Segers V et al (2012) Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:679–684CrossRefPubMed Votino C, Cannie M, Segers V et al (2012) Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:679–684CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rutty GN, Brough A, Biggs MJ et al (2013) The role of micro-computed tomography in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 225:60–66CrossRefPubMed Rutty GN, Brough A, Biggs MJ et al (2013) The role of micro-computed tomography in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 225:60–66CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lombardi CM, Zambelli V, Botta G et al (2014) Post-mortem micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) of small fetuses and hearts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1002/uog.13330 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed Lombardi CM, Zambelli V, Botta G et al (2014) Post-mortem micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) of small fetuses and hearts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.​1002/​uog.​13330 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
32.
go back to reference Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR et al (1996) Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348:1139–1141CrossRefPubMed Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR et al (1996) Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348:1139–1141CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP et al (1987) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46CrossRef Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP et al (1987) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Paley MNJ, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273CrossRefPubMed Griffiths PD, Paley MNJ, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ et al (2009) A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 72:321–326CrossRefPubMed Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ et al (2009) A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 72:321–326CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Prodhomme O, Seguret F, Martrille L et al (2012) Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97:F434–F438PubMed Prodhomme O, Seguret F, Martrille L et al (2012) Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97:F434–F438PubMed
37.
go back to reference Votino C, Verhoye M, Segers V et al (2012) Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:673–678CrossRefPubMed Votino C, Verhoye M, Segers V et al (2012) Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:673–678CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefPubMed Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Arthurs OJ, Barber J, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ (2014) Normal appearances on perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00247-014-3166-y Arthurs OJ, Barber J, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ (2014) Normal appearances on perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00247-014-3166-y
40.
go back to reference Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ et al (2009) Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 374:467–475CrossRefPubMed Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ et al (2009) Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 374:467–475CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Sebire NJ, Miller S, Jacques TS et al (2013) Post-mortem apparent resolution of fetal ventriculomegaly: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 33:360–364PubMed Sebire NJ, Miller S, Jacques TS et al (2013) Post-mortem apparent resolution of fetal ventriculomegaly: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 33:360–364PubMed
42.
go back to reference Liebrechts-Akkerman G, Liu F, Lao O et al (2014) PHOX2B polyalanine repeat length is associated with sudden infant death syndrome and unclassified sudden infant death in the Dutch population. Int J Legal Med 128:621–629PubMed Liebrechts-Akkerman G, Liu F, Lao O et al (2014) PHOX2B polyalanine repeat length is associated with sudden infant death syndrome and unclassified sudden infant death in the Dutch population. Int J Legal Med 128:621–629PubMed
43.
go back to reference Evans A, Bagnall RD, Duflou J et al (2013) Postmortem review and genetic analysis in sudden infant death syndrome: an 11-year review. Hum Pathol 44:1730–1736CrossRefPubMed Evans A, Bagnall RD, Duflou J et al (2013) Postmortem review and genetic analysis in sudden infant death syndrome: an 11-year review. Hum Pathol 44:1730–1736CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S et al (2012) Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (‘keyhole autopsy’): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:513–518CrossRefPubMed Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S et al (2012) Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (‘keyhole autopsy’): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:513–518CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS et al (2013) Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diag 33:307–312 Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS et al (2013) Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diag 33:307–312
46.
go back to reference Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA et al (2011) Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:317–323CrossRefPubMed Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA et al (2011) Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:317–323CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P et al (2012) Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:659–665CrossRefPubMed Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P et al (2012) Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:659–665CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice
Authors
Owen J. Arthurs
Andrew M. Taylor
Neil J. Sebire
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3165-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Pediatric Radiology 4/2015 Go to the issue