Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2014

01-10-2014 | Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Developing patient-specific dose protocols for a CT scanner and exam using diagnostic reference levels

Author: Keith J. Strauss

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The management of image quality and radiation dose during pediatric CT scanning is dependent on how well one manages the radiographic techniques as a function of the type of exam, type of CT scanner, and patient size. The CT scanner’s display of expected CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) after the projection scan provides the operator with a powerful tool prior to the patient scan to identify and manage appropriate CT techniques, provided the department has established appropriate diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). This paper provides a step-by-step process that allows the development of DRLs as a function of type of exam, of actual patient size and of the individual radiation output of each CT scanner in a department. Abdomen, pelvis, thorax and head scans are addressed. Patient sizes from newborns to large adults are discussed. The method addresses every CT scanner regardless of vendor, model or vintage. We cover adjustments to techniques to manage the impact of iterative reconstruction and provide a method to handle all available voltages other than 120 kV. This level of management of CT techniques is necessary to properly monitor radiation dose and image quality during pediatric CT scans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301PubMedCrossRef Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:303–306PubMedCrossRef Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:303–306PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frush DP (2009) Radiation, CT, and children: the simple answer is … it’s complicated. Radiology 252:4–6PubMedCrossRef Frush DP (2009) Radiation, CT, and children: the simple answer is … it’s complicated. Radiology 252:4–6PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently vendor summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1169–1175PubMedCrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently vendor summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1169–1175PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Robinson TJ, Robinson JD, Kanal KM (2013) Implementation of the ACR dose index registry at a large academic institution: early experience. J Digit Imaging 26:309–315PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Robinson TJ, Robinson JD, Kanal KM (2013) Implementation of the ACR dose index registry at a large academic institution: early experience. J Digit Imaging 26:309–315PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Morin R (2011) TU‐B‐110‐02: ACR dose index registry for comparing CT dose indices. Med Phys 38:3749CrossRef Morin R (2011) TU‐B‐110‐02: ACR dose index registry for comparing CT dose indices. Med Phys 38:3749CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McCollough C (2011) Translating protocols across patient size: babies to bariatric. AAPM 2011 Summit. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD, p 45 McCollough C (2011) Translating protocols across patient size: babies to bariatric. AAPM 2011 Summit. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD, p 45
10.
go back to reference Fletcher JG (2010) Adjusting kV to reduce dose or improve image quality — how to do it right. AAPM technology assessment institute: summit on CT dose. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD, p 62 Fletcher JG (2010) Adjusting kV to reduce dose or improve image quality — how to do it right. AAPM technology assessment institute: summit on CT dose. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD, p 62
11.
go back to reference Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology 259:793–801PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology 259:793–801PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCollough CH (2013) Standardization versus individualization: how each contributes to managing dose in computed tomography. Health Phys 105:445–453PubMedCrossRef McCollough CH (2013) Standardization versus individualization: how each contributes to managing dose in computed tomography. Health Phys 105:445–453PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Solomon JB, Christianson O, Samei E (2012) Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Med Phys 39:6048–6055PubMedCrossRef Solomon JB, Christianson O, Samei E (2012) Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Med Phys 39:6048–6055PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics (2000) 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD, p 203 National Center for Health Statistics (2000) 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD, p 203
20.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268:208–218PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268:208–218PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB et al (2010) Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 256:261–269PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB et al (2010) Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 256:261–269PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J et al (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257:373–383PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J et al (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257:373–383PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology 260:454–462PubMedCrossRef Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology 260:454–462PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:868–873PubMedCrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:868–873PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR (2008) Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage. Phys Med Biol 53:4719–4732PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR (2008) Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage. Phys Med Biol 53:4719–4732PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pena P et al (2000) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:985–992PubMedCrossRef Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pena P et al (2000) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:985–992PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Crawley MT, Booth A, Wainwright A (2001) A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved. Br J Radiol 74:607–614PubMedCrossRef Crawley MT, Booth A, Wainwright A (2001) A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved. Br J Radiol 74:607–614PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Callahan MJ, Frush DP et al (2012) The image gently campaign: championing radiation protection for children through awareness, educational resources and advocacy. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevernois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 649 Goske MJ, Callahan MJ, Frush DP et al (2012) The image gently campaign: championing radiation protection for children through awareness, educational resources and advocacy. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevernois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 649
Metadata
Title
Developing patient-specific dose protocols for a CT scanner and exam using diagnostic reference levels
Author
Keith J. Strauss
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3088-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2014

Pediatric Radiology 3/2014 Go to the issue

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Dose indices: everybody wants a number

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: how to use new CT technologies for children

If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Clinical decision-making tools for exam selection, reporting and dose tracking