Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities

Authors: Sumi Hoshiko, Daniel Smith, Cathyn Fan, Carrie R. Jones, Sandra V. McNeel, Ronald A. Cohen

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Radiation exposure from medical sources now equals or exceeds that from natural background sources, largely attributable to a 20-fold increase in CT use since 1980. Increasing exposure to children and fetuses is of most concern due to their heightened susceptibility. More recently, CT use may be leveling or decreasing, but it is unclear whether this change is widespread or varies by type of institution.

Objective

We sought to characterize trends in CT utilization in California hospitals and emergency departments among children and pregnant women, looking at different types of facilities, such as teaching, private, public and nonprofit institutions.

Materials and methods

We examined frequency of CT examinations by year from 229 facilities reporting CT usage in routinely collected California statewide data for 2005–2012. We modeled trends overall and by facility type.

Results

CT scans for pediatric and pregnant patient visits in the emergency department increased initially, then started to decline after 2008. Among hospital admissions, rates declined or leveled after 2005. In the emergency department, CT rates varied between types of facilities, with teaching hospitals reducing use sooner and more sharply than other types of facilities.

Conclusion

CT utilization in California among children and pregnant women has begun to level or decline. Still, population exposure remains at historically high levels, warranting consideration of potential public health implications. Further examination of reasons for trends among hospital types, particularly how teaching hospitals have reduced rates of CT utilization, may help identify strategies for CT reduction without compromising patient care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, MD National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, MD
2.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources–1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources–1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–8 Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–8
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086PubMedCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part I, cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedCrossRef Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part I, cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (2006) Biological effects of ionizing radiation VII, health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. The National Academies Press, Washington National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (2006) Biological effects of ionizing radiation VII, health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. The National Academies Press, Washington
8.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Menoch MJ, Hirsh DA, Khan NS et al (2012) Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 129:e690–e697PubMedCrossRef Menoch MJ, Hirsh DA, Khan NS et al (2012) Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 129:e690–e697PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roudsari BS, Psoter KJ, Vavilala MS et al (2013) CT use in hospitalized pediatric trauma patients: 15-year trends in a level I pediatric and adult trauma center. Radiology 267:479–486PubMedCrossRef Roudsari BS, Psoter KJ, Vavilala MS et al (2013) CT use in hospitalized pediatric trauma patients: 15-year trends in a level I pediatric and adult trauma center. Radiology 267:479–486PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization–trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol Suppl 2:562–566CrossRef Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization–trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol Suppl 2:562–566CrossRef
13.
go back to reference California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (2005–2011) California Health and Human Services Agency. Emergency Department and Patient Discharge Data. Sacramento, CA California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (2005–2011) California Health and Human Services Agency. Emergency Department and Patient Discharge Data. Sacramento, CA
14.
go back to reference American Medical Association (2010) Current procedural terminology: CPT, Standard edn. American Medical Association, Chicago American Medical Association (2010) Current procedural terminology: CPT, Standard edn. American Medical Association, Chicago
15.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Classification of diseases, functioning, and disability: International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Page last reviewed: 18 June 2013. Accessed 1 July 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Classification of diseases, functioning, and disability: International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​nchs/​icd/​icd9cm.​htm. Page last reviewed: 18 June 2013. Accessed 1 July 2013
19.
go back to reference Office of Statewide Planning and Development (2005–2011) Patient discharge data, file documentation Office of Statewide Planning and Development (2005–2011) Patient discharge data, file documentation
20.
go back to reference Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, volume II: the design and analysis of cohort studies, IARC Scientific Publication No. 82. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, volume II: the design and analysis of cohort studies, IARC Scientific Publication No. 82. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
21.
go back to reference Littell R, Milliken GA, Stroup W et al (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, Cary Littell R, Milliken GA, Stroup W et al (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, Cary
22.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT® 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT® 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
23.
go back to reference Cleveland WS (1985) Elements of graphing data. Hobart Press, Summit Cleveland WS (1985) Elements of graphing data. Hobart Press, Summit
24.
go back to reference Mannix R, Meehan WP, Monuteaux MC et al (2012) Computed tomography for minor head injury: variation and trends in major United States pediatric emergency departments. J Pediatr 160:136–9.e1PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mannix R, Meehan WP, Monuteaux MC et al (2012) Computed tomography for minor head injury: variation and trends in major United States pediatric emergency departments. J Pediatr 160:136–9.e1PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D et al (2009) Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997–2006. Radiology 251:517–524PubMedCrossRef Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D et al (2009) Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997–2006. Radiology 251:517–524PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Goldberg-Stein S, Liu B, Hahn PF et al (2011) Body CT during pregnancy: utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:146–151PubMedCrossRef Goldberg-Stein S, Liu B, Hahn PF et al (2011) Body CT during pregnancy: utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:146–151PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682PubMedCrossRef Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2010) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464 Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2010) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464
36.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Weigner MB, Dewar KM, Basham HF et al (2012) Impact of education on physician attitudes toward computed tomography utilization and consent. J Emerg Med 43:e349–e353PubMedCrossRef Weigner MB, Dewar KM, Basham HF et al (2012) Impact of education on physician attitudes toward computed tomography utilization and consent. J Emerg Med 43:e349–e353PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Schroeder AR, Redberg RF (2013) The harm in looking. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–3 Schroeder AR, Redberg RF (2013) The harm in looking. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–3
41.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W et al (2012) Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology 264:567–580PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W et al (2012) Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology 264:567–580PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities
Authors
Sumi Hoshiko
Daniel Smith
Cathyn Fan
Carrie R. Jones
Sandra V. McNeel
Ronald A. Cohen
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2881-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Pediatric Radiology 5/2014 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes