Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Article

Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?

Authors: Matthew Winfeld, Naomi Strubel, Lynne Pinkney, Shailee Lala, Sarah Milla, James Babb, Nancy Fefferman

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shielding of the gonads is a dose-saving strategy in pediatric radiography and its use is the law in New York and the majority of other states. However, routine use of gonadal shields is controversial because of concerns that important diagnostic information can be obscured.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and spatial distribution of key findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the 2,544 portable neonatal intensive care unit anteroposterior abdominal radiographs performed in 2010 at a university medical center, of which 962 were inadequately shielded. These 962 radiographs were reviewed by pairs of pediatric radiologists for the presence of findings in different regions, including bowel abnormalities, pneumatosis, free air, inguinal hernias, osseous abnormalities, and catheter/tube tips.

Results

The fewest pertinent findings were present below the level of the sacrosciatic notches (n = 181, 18.8%). Of the 853 abnormalities below the level of the iliac crests in our cohort, six were isolated to these regions, whereas others had concomitant abnormalities more superiorly. Of 35 radiographs with pneumatosis or suspected pneumatosis in the pelvis, 33 had pneumatosis in more superior regions. Suspected free air was never isolated to the pelvis. Osseous abnormalities were only present in the pelvis below the sacrosciatic notch, and 37.5% of lower extremity catheters terminated below the level of the sacrosciatic notches.

Conclusion

Pertinent findings on neonatal intensive care unit abdominal radiographs are rarely isolated to the pelvic regions.
Literature
13.
go back to reference Illinois Emergency Management Agency (2008) Illinois administrative code, title 32: energy chapter II: Illinois emergency management agency subchapter B: radiation protection part 360: use of X-rays in the healing arts including medical, dental, podiatry, and veterinary medicine. http://www.state.il.us/iema/legal/pdf/32_360.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013 Illinois Emergency Management Agency (2008) Illinois administrative code, title 32: energy chapter II: Illinois emergency management agency subchapter B: radiation protection part 360: use of X-rays in the healing arts including medical, dental, podiatry, and veterinary medicine. http://​www.​state.​il.​us/​iema/​legal/​pdf/​32_​360.​pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013
50.
go back to reference Frayre AS, Torres P, Gaona E et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction in a neonatal intensive care unit in computed radiography. Appl Radiat Isotopes 71:57–60CrossRef Frayre AS, Torres P, Gaona E et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction in a neonatal intensive care unit in computed radiography. Appl Radiat Isotopes 71:57–60CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Suleiman OH (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 3:S242–S246CrossRef Suleiman OH (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 3:S242–S246CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. The Brit J Radiol 82:363–370CrossRef Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. The Brit J Radiol 82:363–370CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedCrossRef Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedCrossRef
56.
57.
go back to reference Brindhaban A, Al-Khalifah K (2004) Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 111:275–281PubMedCrossRef Brindhaban A, Al-Khalifah K (2004) Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 111:275–281PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Makri T et al (2006) Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Phys Med Biol 51:5023–5033PubMedCrossRef Makri T et al (2006) Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Phys Med Biol 51:5023–5033PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann Roy Coll Surg 85:422–425CrossRef Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann Roy Coll Surg 85:422–425CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Curtis JR (2010) Computed tomography shielding methods: a literature review. Radiol Technol 81:428–436PubMed Curtis JR (2010) Computed tomography shielding methods: a literature review. Radiol Technol 81:428–436PubMed
61.
go back to reference Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E et al (2005) Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:128–130PubMedCrossRef Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E et al (2005) Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:128–130PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Price R, Halson P, Sampson M (1999) Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield. Brit J Radiol 72:489–494PubMed Price R, Halson P, Sampson M (1999) Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield. Brit J Radiol 72:489–494PubMed
63.
go back to reference Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Onder H et al (2012) A new practical model of testes shield: the effectiveness during abdominopelvic computerized tomography. J Androl 33:984–989PubMedCrossRef Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Onder H et al (2012) A new practical model of testes shield: the effectiveness during abdominopelvic computerized tomography. J Androl 33:984–989PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in radiographic dose reduction. Radiol Technol 76:150–152PubMed Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in radiographic dose reduction. Radiol Technol 76:150–152PubMed
65.
go back to reference Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams—a white paper conference executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 3:S162–S164CrossRef Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams—a white paper conference executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 3:S162–S164CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Don S, Goske MJ, John S et al (2011) Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 41:562–565PubMedCrossRef Don S, Goske MJ, John S et al (2011) Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 41:562–565PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H et al (2001) Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649PubMedCrossRef McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H et al (2001) Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649PubMedCrossRef
68.
69.
go back to reference Graf JL, Caty MG, Martin DJ et al (2002) Pediatric hernias. Semin Ultrasound CT 23:197–200CrossRef Graf JL, Caty MG, Martin DJ et al (2002) Pediatric hernias. Semin Ultrasound CT 23:197–200CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K et al (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259PubMedCrossRef Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K et al (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Fawcett SL, Gomez AC, Barter SJ et al (2012) More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries. Brit J Radiol 85:e442–e447PubMedCrossRef Fawcett SL, Gomez AC, Barter SJ et al (2012) More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries. Brit J Radiol 85:e442–e447PubMedCrossRef
72.
Metadata
Title
Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?
Authors
Matthew Winfeld
Naomi Strubel
Lynne Pinkney
Shailee Lala
Sarah Milla
James Babb
Nancy Fefferman
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2700-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Pediatric Radiology 10/2013 Go to the issue