Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Original Article

The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study

Authors: Hyun Woo Goo, Dong Soo Suh

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For the optimum application of tube current modulation in paediatric CT it is important to know the influences of different imaging parameters on it.

Objective

This phantom study was performed to evaluate the influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation, which is a combination of angular and z-axis modulation.

Materials and methods

Sixteen-slice spiral CT with combined tube current modulation was performed using four different phantoms (one adult-size anthropomorphic phantom and three cone-shaped acryl phantoms) at three different tube voltages (80, 100 and 120 kVp) and two scan directions (craniocaudal and caudocranial). Effective tube current–time product (mAs) was chosen to maintain a consistent CTDIvol for each phantom. Other parameters, including detector collimation, slice width, pitch, reconstruction algorithm, scan field of view, and scan range were identical for each phantom. Changes in CTDIvol and mAs resulting from the modulation were calculated and compared.

Results

Changes in CTDIvol and mAs resulting from the modulation were different among the three tube voltages. In larger phantoms the greatest reductions (−6.1±3.9% in CTDIvol and −12.5±4.0% in mAs) were obtained with 120 kVp, whereas in smaller phantoms they were obtained with 80 kVp (−2.8±0.9% in CTDIvol and −2.5±4.9% in mAs). Smaller CTDIvol (2.4±0.9 mGy vs. 2.5±1.0 mGy, P=0.017) and mAs (57.2±40.4 mAs vs. 61.4±43.2 mAs, P=0.002) were used in caudocranial scans than in craniocaudal scans with the modulation.

Conclusion

Combined tube current modulation is influenced by tube voltage and scan direction depending on phantom profile.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goo HW (2005) Pediatric CT: understanding of radiation dose and optimization of imaging techniques. J Korean Radiol Soc 52:1–5 Goo HW (2005) Pediatric CT: understanding of radiation dose and optimization of imaging techniques. J Korean Radiol Soc 52:1–5
3.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goo HW, Suh DS (2006) Tube current reduction in non-electrocardiography-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:344–351PubMedCrossRef Goo HW, Suh DS (2006) Tube current reduction in non-electrocardiography-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:344–351PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, et al (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, et al (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greess H, Wolf H, Baum U, et al (2000) Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol 10:391–394PubMedCrossRef Greess H, Wolf H, Baum U, et al (2000) Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol 10:391–394PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Das M, Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, et al (2005) Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1437–1443PubMed Das M, Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, et al (2005) Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1437–1443PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, et al (2005) Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. Radiology 237:303–308PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, et al (2005) Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. Radiology 237:303–308PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:331–334PubMed Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:331–334PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Delannoy V, et al (2004) Multi-detector row spiral CT angiography of the thoracic outlet: dose reduction with anatomically adapted online tube current modulation and preset dose savings. Radiology 230:116–124PubMedCrossRef Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Delannoy V, et al (2004) Multi-detector row spiral CT angiography of the thoracic outlet: dose reduction with anatomically adapted online tube current modulation and preset dose savings. Radiology 230:116–124PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, et al (2002) Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol 12:1571–1576PubMedCrossRef Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, et al (2002) Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol 12:1571–1576PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rizzo SM, Kalra MK, Schmidt B (2005) Automatic exposure control techniques for individual dose adaptation (letter). Radiology 235:335–336PubMedCrossRef Rizzo SM, Kalra MK, Schmidt B (2005) Automatic exposure control techniques for individual dose adaptation (letter). Radiology 235:335–336PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, et al (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360PubMedCrossRef Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, et al (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, et al (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174PubMedCrossRef Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, et al (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study
Authors
Hyun Woo Goo
Dong Soo Suh
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0177-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

Pediatric Radiology 8/2006 Go to the issue