Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis

Authors: Andrea S. Doria, Heidi Amernic, Paul Dick, Paul Babyn, Peter Chait, Jacob Langer, Peter C. Coyte, Wendy J. Ungar

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Assessment of appendicitis during a weeknight or weekend shift (after-hours period, AHP) might be more costly and less effective than its assessment on a weekday shift (standard hours period, SHP) because of increased costs (staff premium fees) and perforation risk (longer delays and less experience of fellows). Objectives: The objectives were to compare the costs and effectiveness of assessing children with suspected appendicitis who required a laparotomy and had US or CT after-hours with those of assessing children during standard hours, and to evaluate the importance of diagnostic imaging (DI) within the overall costs. Materials and methods: We retrospectively microcosted resource use within six areas of a tertiary hospital (emergency [ED], diagnostic imaging (DI), surgery, wards, transport, and pathology) in a tertiary hospital. About 41 children (1.8–17 years) in the AHP and 35 (2.9–16 years) in the SHP were evaluated. Work shift effectiveness was measured with a histological score that assessed the severity of appendicitis (non-perforated appendicitis: scores 1–3; perforated appendicitis: score 4). Results: The SHP was less costly and more effective regardless of whether the calculation included US or CT costs only. For a salary-based fee schedule, US$733 were saved per case of perforated appendicitis averted in the SHP. For a fee-for-service payment schedule, $847 were saved. Within the overall budget, the highest costs were those incurred on the ward for both shifts. The average cost per patient in DI ranged from 2 to 5% of the total costs in both shifts. Most perforation cases were found in the AHP (31.7%, AHP vs. 17.1%, SHP), which resulted in higher ward costs for patients in the AHP. Conclusion: A higher proportion of severe cases was seen in the AHP, which led to its higher costs. As a result, the SHP dominated the AHP, being less costly and more effective regardless of the fee schedule applied. The DI costs contributed little to the overall cost of the assessment of appendicitis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lund DP, Murphy EU (1994) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. J Pediatr Surg 29:1130–1134CrossRefPubMed Lund DP, Murphy EU (1994) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. J Pediatr Surg 29:1130–1134CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Crady SK, Jones JS, Wyn T, et al (1993) Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 22:1125–1129CrossRef Crady SK, Jones JS, Wyn T, et al (1993) Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 22:1125–1129CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Adolph VR, Falterman KW (1996) Appendicitis in children in the managed care era. J Pediatr Surg 31:1035–1037CrossRefPubMed Adolph VR, Falterman KW (1996) Appendicitis in children in the managed care era. J Pediatr Surg 31:1035–1037CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL (1996) Does the patient have appendicitis? JAMA 276:1589–1594CrossRef Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL (1996) Does the patient have appendicitis? JAMA 276:1589–1594CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilcox RT, Traverso LW (1997) Have the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? Surg Clin North Am 77:1355–1370CrossRef Wilcox RT, Traverso LW (1997) Have the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? Surg Clin North Am 77:1355–1370CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bell CM, Redelmeier DA (2001) Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N Engl J Med 345:663–668CrossRef Bell CM, Redelmeier DA (2001) Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N Engl J Med 345:663–668CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mangold WD (1981) Neonatal mortality by the day of the week in the 1974–1975. Arkansas live birth cohort. Am J Public Health 71:601–605PubMed Mangold WD (1981) Neonatal mortality by the day of the week in the 1974–1975. Arkansas live birth cohort. Am J Public Health 71:601–605PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hendry RA (1981) The weekend—a dangerous time to be born? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:1200–1203PubMed Hendry RA (1981) The weekend—a dangerous time to be born? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:1200–1203PubMed
10.
go back to reference Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE, et al (1998) Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 17:217–221PubMed Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE, et al (1998) Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 17:217–221PubMed
11.
go back to reference Clark AP (2002) Hospital deaths and weekend admissions—how do we leap across a chiasm? Clin Nurs Spec 16:91–92CrossRef Clark AP (2002) Hospital deaths and weekend admissions—how do we leap across a chiasm? Clin Nurs Spec 16:91–92CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barnett MJ, Kaboli PJ, Sirio CA, et al (2002) Day of the week of intensive care admission and patient outcomes. Med Care 40:530–539CrossRefPubMed Barnett MJ, Kaboli PJ, Sirio CA, et al (2002) Day of the week of intensive care admission and patient outcomes. Med Care 40:530–539CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lowe LH, Draud KS, Hernanz-Schulman M, et al (2001) Nonenhanced limited CT in children suspected of having appendicitis: prospective comparison of attending and resident interpretations. Radiology 221:755–759PubMed Lowe LH, Draud KS, Hernanz-Schulman M, et al (2001) Nonenhanced limited CT in children suspected of having appendicitis: prospective comparison of attending and resident interpretations. Radiology 221:755–759PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sunil K, Sundeep J (2004) Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:165–167PubMed Sunil K, Sundeep J (2004) Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:165–167PubMed
15.
go back to reference Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M (1993) Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 80:18–20PubMed Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M (1993) Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 80:18–20PubMed
17.
go back to reference Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York
18.
go back to reference Crawford JM (1994) The gastrointestinal system. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL (eds) Pathologic basis of disease, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 822–823 Crawford JM (1994) The gastrointestinal system. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL (eds) Pathologic basis of disease, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 822–823
19.
go back to reference Liem YS, Kock MC, Ijzermans JNM, et al (2003) Living renal donors: optimizing the imaging strategy—decision-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 226:53–62 Liem YS, Kock MC, Ijzermans JNM, et al (2003) Living renal donors: optimizing the imaging strategy—decision-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 226:53–62
20.
go back to reference Roosevelt GE, Reynolds SL (1998) Does the use of ultrasonography improve the outcome of children with appendicitis? Acad Emerg Med 5:1071–1075PubMed Roosevelt GE, Reynolds SL (1998) Does the use of ultrasonography improve the outcome of children with appendicitis? Acad Emerg Med 5:1071–1075PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hamilton J, Rao PM, Wagner JM, et al (1998) Appendicitis: unmasking the great masquerader. Patient Care 32:140–156 Hamilton J, Rao PM, Wagner JM, et al (1998) Appendicitis: unmasking the great masquerader. Patient Care 32:140–156
22.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT. Impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349CrossRefPubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT. Impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ujiki MB, Murayama K, Cribbins J, et al (2002) CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res 105:119–122CrossRefPubMed Ujiki MB, Murayama K, Cribbins J, et al (2002) CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res 105:119–122CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Moore JD Jr (1996) Hospital saves by working weekends. Mod Healthc 26:82–84 Moore JD Jr (1996) Hospital saves by working weekends. Mod Healthc 26:82–84
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis
Authors
Andrea S. Doria
Heidi Amernic
Paul Dick
Paul Babyn
Peter Chait
Jacob Langer
Peter C. Coyte
Wendy J. Ungar
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1570-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Pediatric Radiology 12/2005 Go to the issue

Pediatric Radiology CME Activity

CME questions - December 2005