Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Complication rates of diagnostic cerebral arteriography in children

Authors: Eva Fung, Vijeya Ganesan, Timothy S. C. Cox, Wui Khean Chong, Dawn E. Saunders

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Cerebral arteriography (CA) remains the gold standard in delineating both intra- and extracranial vascular anatomy. Most data relating to the safety of CA are drawn from studies of adult patients in whom the practicalities of the procedure, range of potential pathologies and comorbid factors are different from those in children. Objective: To evaluate the current local and neurological complication rates of paediatric CA in the setting of a tertiary level children’s hospital in the UK. Materials and methods: Data from patients who had undergone CA between January 1998 and July 2003 were reviewed. The medical, anaesthetic and nursing records, and angiography reports were reviewed for all identified patients. The following parameters were extracted and entered into a proforma: gender, age, ethnicity, diagnosis, cerebrovascular diagnosis, referral source, date of CA, number of vessels catheterized and local and neurological complications. Results: A total of 176 CA studies were undertaken in 150 patients (median age 7.3 years, range neonate to 19 years; 83 males, 67 females) during the 5.5-year study period. The majority of referrals originated from the neurology (58%) and neurosurgery services (27.8%). No neurological complications or deaths occurred. Local complications occurred in eight children (4.5%). Five children had a groin haematoma and two had bleeding at the puncture site. A single child had a reduced pedal pulse distal to the site of catheterization, but Doppler imaging was normal. Conclusions: CA has a continuing role in the evaluation of cerebrovascular pathologies in children. Neurological complications are rare and local complications are not uncommon (around 5%), but are not usually serious.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Husson B, Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P, et al (2002) Magnetic resonance angiography in childhood arterial brain infarcts: a comparative study with contrast angiography. Stroke 33:1280–1285CrossRefPubMed Husson B, Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P, et al (2002) Magnetic resonance angiography in childhood arterial brain infarcts: a comparative study with contrast angiography. Stroke 33:1280–1285CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528PubMed Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528PubMed
3.
go back to reference Leffers AM, Wagner A (2000) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 41:204–210 Leffers AM, Wagner A (2000) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 41:204–210
4.
go back to reference Pettersson H, Fitz CR, Harwood-Nash DC, et al (1981) Iatrogenic embolization: complication of pediatric cerebral angiography. AJNR 2:357–361PubMed Pettersson H, Fitz CR, Harwood-Nash DC, et al (1981) Iatrogenic embolization: complication of pediatric cerebral angiography. AJNR 2:357–361PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cerullo LJ, Rajakulasingam K, Raimondi AJ (1980) Femoral–cerebral angiography in infants and children. Analysis and comparison with direct puncture/retrograde brachial technique. Childs Brain 6:1–12 Cerullo LJ, Rajakulasingam K, Raimondi AJ (1980) Femoral–cerebral angiography in infants and children. Analysis and comparison with direct puncture/retrograde brachial technique. Childs Brain 6:1–12
6.
go back to reference Robertson RL, Chavali RV, Robson CD, et al (1998) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography in childhood moyamoya syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 28:824–829CrossRefPubMed Robertson RL, Chavali RV, Robson CD, et al (1998) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography in childhood moyamoya syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 28:824–829CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ganesan V, Prengler M, McShane MA, et al (2003) Investigation of risk factors in children with arterial ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 53:167–173CrossRefPubMed Ganesan V, Prengler M, McShane MA, et al (2003) Investigation of risk factors in children with arterial ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 53:167–173CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al (2001) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 48:973–982CrossRefPubMed Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al (2001) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 48:973–982CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, et al (2003) Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 45:843–850CrossRefPubMed Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, et al (2003) Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 45:843–850CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al (2000) Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 21:1892–1899PubMed Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al (2000) Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 21:1892–1899PubMed
11.
go back to reference Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R, et al (2001) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR 22:1615–1619PubMed Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R, et al (2001) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR 22:1615–1619PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMed Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw J, et al (2001) Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection—prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 219:739–749PubMed White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw J, et al (2001) Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection—prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 219:739–749PubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, et al (2000) MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR 21:707–711PubMed Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, et al (2000) MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR 21:707–711PubMed
15.
go back to reference Alberico RA, Barnes P, Robertson RL, et al (1999) Helical CT angiography: dynamic cerebrovascular imaging in children. AJNR 20:328–334PubMed Alberico RA, Barnes P, Robertson RL, et al (1999) Helical CT angiography: dynamic cerebrovascular imaging in children. AJNR 20:328–334PubMed
Metadata
Title
Complication rates of diagnostic cerebral arteriography in children
Authors
Eva Fung
Vijeya Ganesan
Timothy S. C. Cox
Wui Khean Chong
Dawn E. Saunders
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1554-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Pediatric Radiology 12/2005 Go to the issue