Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

N-terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Premature Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Physiologic Biomarker, But Is It a Clinical Tool?

Authors: Cathy Hammerman, Irena Shchors, Michael S. Schimmel, Ruben Bromiker, Michael Kaplan, Amiram Nir

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This study investigated whether N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels could serve as prognostic indicators of the therapeutic responsiveness of the patent ductus arteriosus to pharmacologic treatment. The levels of NT-proBNP in premature neonates with hemodynamically significant patency of the ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) were assessed before and after treatment using ibuprofen, indomethacin, or both. The baseline NT-proBNP levels were similar in both the infants who responded and those who did not respond to medical treatment. The combined data for all the subjects showed that NT-ProBNP decreased after treatment, but the decrease did not correlate significantly with treatment success or failure. Of the 38 infants, 11 did not respond to treatment with ductal closure. Although the pretreatment NT-proBNP levels were similar, the posttreatment levels in the nonresponders remained significantly higher than in the responders. Moreover, in 3 (27%) of the 11 nonresponders, NT-proBNP actually increased rather than decreased with treatment. The NT-proBNP levels of seven infants increased over the course of the study. Within this group, however, the pretreatment NT-proBNP levels were significantly lower than in the overall population, with no differences in the posttreatment levels. Overall, the decrease in NT-proBNP with treatment, presented as the ratio of pretreatment–post-treatment/pretreatment was not well correlated with the ductal therapeutic outcome. In summary, in the study population, NT-proBNP was not sufficiently sensitive for accurate prediction of ductal therapeutic responsiveness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi M, Lee KH, Eun BL, Yoo KH, Hong YS, Son CS, Lee JW (2005) Utility of rapid B-type natriuretic peptide assay for diagnosis of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics 115:e255–e261CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Lee KH, Eun BL, Yoo KH, Hong YS, Son CS, Lee JW (2005) Utility of rapid B-type natriuretic peptide assay for diagnosis of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics 115:e255–e261CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Czernik C, Lemmer J, Metze B, Koehne PS, Mueller C, Obladen M (2008) B-type natriuretic peptide to predict ductus intervention in infants < 28 weeks. Pediatr Res 64:286–290CrossRefPubMed Czernik C, Lemmer J, Metze B, Koehne PS, Mueller C, Obladen M (2008) B-type natriuretic peptide to predict ductus intervention in infants < 28 weeks. Pediatr Res 64:286–290CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Farombi-Oghuvbu IO, Matthews T, Mayne PD, Guerin H, Corcoran D (2008) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a measure of significant patent ductus arteriosus. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93:F257–F260CrossRefPubMed Farombi-Oghuvbu IO, Matthews T, Mayne PD, Guerin H, Corcoran D (2008) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a measure of significant patent ductus arteriosus. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93:F257–F260CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Flynn PA, DaGraca RL, Auld P, Nesin M, Kleinman C (2005) The use of a bedside assay for plasma B-type natriuretic peptide as a biomarker in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in premature neonates. J Pediatr 147:38–42CrossRefPubMed Flynn PA, DaGraca RL, Auld P, Nesin M, Kleinman C (2005) The use of a bedside assay for plasma B-type natriuretic peptide as a biomarker in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in premature neonates. J Pediatr 147:38–42CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hammerman C, Shchors I, Jacobson S, Schimmel MS, Bromiker R, Kaplan M, Nir A (2008) Ibuprofen vs. continuous indomethacin in premature neonates with patent ductus arteriosus: is the difference in the mode of administration? Pediatr Res 64:291–297CrossRefPubMed Hammerman C, Shchors I, Jacobson S, Schimmel MS, Bromiker R, Kaplan M, Nir A (2008) Ibuprofen vs. continuous indomethacin in premature neonates with patent ductus arteriosus: is the difference in the mode of administration? Pediatr Res 64:291–297CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Holmstrom H, Hall C, Thaulow E (2001) Plasma levels of natriuretic peptides and hemodynamic assessment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 90:184–191CrossRefPubMed Holmstrom H, Hall C, Thaulow E (2001) Plasma levels of natriuretic peptides and hemodynamic assessment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 90:184–191CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Puddy VF, Amirmansour C, Williams AF, Singer DRJ (2002) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Clin Sci 103:75–77CrossRefPubMed Puddy VF, Amirmansour C, Williams AF, Singer DRJ (2002) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Clin Sci 103:75–77CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sanjeev S, Pettersen M, Lua J, Thomas R, Shankaran S, L’Ecuyer T (2005) Role of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in screening for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. J Perinatol 25:709–713CrossRefPubMed Sanjeev S, Pettersen M, Lua J, Thomas R, Shankaran S, L’Ecuyer T (2005) Role of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in screening for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. J Perinatol 25:709–713CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
N-terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Premature Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Physiologic Biomarker, But Is It a Clinical Tool?
Authors
Cathy Hammerman
Irena Shchors
Michael S. Schimmel
Ruben Bromiker
Michael Kaplan
Amiram Nir
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9568-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Pediatric Cardiology 1/2010 Go to the issue