Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Mastectomy | Original Paper

Evaluation of the reliability of a new simple device for standardized breast volume measurements

Authors: Rasha Abdelkader, Tarek Mahboub Ahmed, Walaa Anis Mansour, Sahar A. Abdalbary, Mohammed Ahmed Hussein

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the breast volume being an essential metric component of any aesthetic or reconstructive breast surgery, up to date, there has been no accepted measurement technique that is globally accepted by breast surgeons. Appropriate measurement might lead to decrease of the reoperation rates. We introduced a novel technique that provides simply accurate volume measurement.

Methods

Thirty patients with breast cancer who were scheduled for modified radical mastectomy were included in the study. Preoperative breast volume measurement using the novel device and breast MRI studies was done for all patients; meanwhile, the gold standard technique (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) was used to measure the volume of breast specimen following mastectomy.

Results

There were strongly positive correlations between the device and gold standard technique (r = 0.957) in 23 patients, and (r = 0.997) in 30 patients when MRI was compared to gold standard measurements. In group 1 (breast volume < 500), there is a strong correlation between the device and gold standard (r = 0.914) and for the MRI and gold standard (r = 0.965). In group 2 (500–1000), there was also a strong correlation between the device and gold standard (r = 0.986) and for the MRI and gold standard (r = 0.989) as well.

Conclusions

The novel device had been proven to be cost-efficient, simple, reproducible technique with minimal learning curve. It provides reliably comparable results to gold standard techniques and MRI measurement in breast volumes up to 1000 cc. It utilized simple material and basic principles that can be easily used in most settings.
Level of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tepper OM et al (2010) Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(1):393–400CrossRef Tepper OM et al (2010) Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(1):393–400CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, Veitch DE, Woodman RJ, Dean NR (2012) Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):135–141CrossRef Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, Veitch DE, Woodman RJ, Dean NR (2012) Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):135–141CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kovacs L et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16(2):137–145CrossRef Kovacs L et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16(2):137–145CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRef Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S (2001) Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 10(2):117–123CrossRef Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S (2001) Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 10(2):117–123CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van Limbergen E, van der Schueren E, Van Tongelen K (1989) Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. Radiother Oncol 16(3):159–167 Van Limbergen E, van der Schueren E, Van Tongelen K (1989) Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. Radiother Oncol 16(3):159–167
7.
go back to reference Henseler H, Ju X, Ayoub A, Ray AK (2013) The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(11):1551–1556CrossRef Henseler H, Ju X, Ayoub A, Ray AK (2013) The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(11):1551–1556CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kovacs L et al (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef Kovacs L et al (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smith DJ, Palin WE, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):331–335CrossRef Smith DJ, Palin WE, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):331–335CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Loughry CW et al (1989) Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 22(5):380–385CrossRef Loughry CW et al (1989) Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 22(5):380–385CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wilkie T, Ship AG (1976) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 1(1):301–305CrossRef Wilkie T, Ship AG (1976) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 1(1):301–305CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tegtmeier RE (1978) A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1(6):625–627CrossRef Tegtmeier RE (1978) A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1(6):625–627CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tezel E, Numanoǧlu A (2000) Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1019–1023CrossRef Tezel E, Numanoǧlu A (2000) Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1019–1023CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6(4):363–367CrossRef Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6(4):363–367CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Edsander-Nord Å, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30(2):129–132CrossRef Edsander-Nord Å, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30(2):129–132CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Herold C, Reichelt A, Stieglitz LH, Dettmer S, Knobloch K, Lotz J, Vogt PM (2010) MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions. J Digit Imaging 23(5):603–610 Herold C, Reichelt A, Stieglitz LH, Dettmer S, Knobloch K, Lotz J, Vogt PM (2010) MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions. J Digit Imaging 23(5):603–610
18.
go back to reference Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(6):851–852CrossRef Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(6):851–852CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Radecka B, Litwiniuk M (2016) Breast cancer in young women. Ginekol Pol 87(9):659–663CrossRef Radecka B, Litwiniuk M (2016) Breast cancer in young women. Ginekol Pol 87(9):659–663CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A (2009) Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 36(3):237–249CrossRef Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A (2009) Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 36(3):237–249CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Voogd AC et al (2001) Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: Pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1688–1697CrossRef Voogd AC et al (2001) Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: Pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1688–1697CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schlichting JA et al (2015) Breast cancer by age at diagnosis in the Gharbiah, Egypt, population-based registry compared to the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 2004-2008. Biomed Res Int 2015 Schlichting JA et al (2015) Breast cancer by age at diagnosis in the Gharbiah, Egypt, population-based registry compared to the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 2004-2008. Biomed Res Int 2015
23.
go back to reference Parmar C, West M, Pathak S, Nelson J, Martin L (2011) Weight versus volume in breast surgery: an observational study. JRSM Short Rep 2(11):1–5CrossRef Parmar C, West M, Pathak S, Nelson J, Martin L (2011) Weight versus volume in breast surgery: an observational study. JRSM Short Rep 2(11):1–5CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M, Gungor O, Catal H, Emiroglu M (2011) Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 5(1):43–52 Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M, Gungor O, Catal H, Emiroglu M (2011) Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 5(1):43–52
25.
go back to reference Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rha EY, Choi IK, Yoo G (2014) Accuracy of the method for estimating breast volume on three-dimensional simulated magnetic resonance imaging scans in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):14–20CrossRef Rha EY, Choi IK, Yoo G (2014) Accuracy of the method for estimating breast volume on three-dimensional simulated magnetic resonance imaging scans in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):14–20CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yoo A, Minn KW, Jin US (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis and its relationship to actual breast weight. Arch Plast Surg 40(3):203–208CrossRef Yoo A, Minn KW, Jin US (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis and its relationship to actual breast weight. Arch Plast Surg 40(3):203–208CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Liu Q, Ye J-M, Xu L, Duan X-N, Zhao J-X, Liu Y-H (2012) Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and histopathology in the measurement of tumor and breast volume and their ratio in breast cancer patients: A prospective study. Chin Med J 125(21):3856–3860PubMed Liu Q, Ye J-M, Xu L, Duan X-N, Zhao J-X, Liu Y-H (2012) Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and histopathology in the measurement of tumor and breast volume and their ratio in breast cancer patients: A prospective study. Chin Med J 125(21):3856–3860PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the reliability of a new simple device for standardized breast volume measurements
Authors
Rasha Abdelkader
Tarek Mahboub Ahmed
Walaa Anis Mansour
Sahar A. Abdalbary
Mohammed Ahmed Hussein
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01805-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue