Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Paper

Perinipple mammaplasty

Authors: Luiz Fernando Frascino, Stefano Pompei

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent publications in plastic breast surgery reinforce the search for surgery with short scars and long-lasting shape maintenance.

Methods

From February 2005 to December 2017, 32 patients underwent breast surgery due to different problems by a perinipple approach exclusively or associated to a vertical or “inverted T” scar, in a total of 62 procedures (2 unilateral). Taking the nipple as a central point, an intra-areolar ring of the skin is de-epithelialized creating an access to a breast implant or just to reduce the areolar diameter in one case. A vertical incision was associated to perform mastopexies and four cases of mastectomy. After closure of the incisions, the natural skin–areola transition was preserved.

Results

The patients pointed out the preservation of the natural skin–areola transition as a major advantage. Six implanted breasts by an exclusive perinipple approach (N = 38) presented scar depigmentation and enlargement (15.7%). One case of mastopexy and implant had a revisional surgery secondary to inferior pole ptosis. Three patients became pregnant and the breastfeed function was preserved. In the cases of the exclusive perinipple approach, the maximum areolar diameter achieved reduction was about 20 to 25% of the original diameter. Neither tissue necrosis nor sensitivity impairment was noticed.

Conclusions

The technique may be incorporated to the therapeutical armamentarium in specially select cases of plastic breast surgery.
Level of evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17(5):367–375CrossRef Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17(5):367–375CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78–85CrossRef Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78–85CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the round block technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(1):93–100CrossRef Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the round block technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(1):93–100CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(1):100–114CrossRef Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(1):100–114CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Biggs TM, Graf R, Taneja A (2003) Maintaining shape in mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 23(3):391–392CrossRef Biggs TM, Graf R, Taneja A (2003) Maintaining shape in mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 23(3):391–392CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gorney M, Gradinger GP, Maxwell PG, Spear SL (2005) Augmentation mastopexy—panel discussion. Aesthet Surg J 25:275–284CrossRef Gorney M, Gradinger GP, Maxwell PG, Spear SL (2005) Augmentation mastopexy—panel discussion. Aesthet Surg J 25:275–284CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gryskiewicz JM, Hatfield AS (2002) “Zigzag” wavy line periareolar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(7):1778–1783 discussion 1784CrossRef Gryskiewicz JM, Hatfield AS (2002) “Zigzag” wavy line periareolar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(7):1778–1783 discussion 1784CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baran CN, Peker F, Ortak T, Sensoz O, Baran NK (2001) Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammaplasty: enlarged areola with flattened nipple. Aesthet Plast Surg 25(4):286–289CrossRef Baran CN, Peker F, Ortak T, Sensoz O, Baran NK (2001) Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammaplasty: enlarged areola with flattened nipple. Aesthet Plast Surg 25(4):286–289CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goes JCS (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of a polyglactin or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968CrossRef Goes JCS (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of a polyglactin or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG (2004) The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1622–1630CrossRef Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG (2004) The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1622–1630CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Spear SL, Giesy SI, Ducic I (2000) Concentric mastopexy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1294–1299CrossRef Spear SL, Giesy SI, Ducic I (2000) Concentric mastopexy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1294–1299CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Puckett CL, Meyer VH, Reinish JF (1985) Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 75(4):533–543CrossRef Puckett CL, Meyer VH, Reinish JF (1985) Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 75(4):533–543CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Regnault B (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed Regnault B (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed
14.
go back to reference Atiyeh BS, Hashim HA, El-Douaihy Y, Kayle DI (1998) Perinipple round-block technique for correction of tuberous/tubular breast deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:284–288CrossRef Atiyeh BS, Hashim HA, El-Douaihy Y, Kayle DI (1998) Perinipple round-block technique for correction of tuberous/tubular breast deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:284–288CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haddad FD, Arruda RG, Alonso N (2006) Treatment of severe gynecomastia (grade III) by resection of periareolar skin. Aesthet Surg J 26:669CrossRef Haddad FD, Arruda RG, Alonso N (2006) Treatment of severe gynecomastia (grade III) by resection of periareolar skin. Aesthet Surg J 26:669CrossRef
16.
go back to reference John Bostwick III (2002) Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. In: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery, vol II, 2nd edn. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, p 1490 John Bostwick III (2002) Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. In: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery, vol II, 2nd edn. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, p 1490
17.
go back to reference Sarahdi NS et al (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast including the nipple and the areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164CrossRef Sarahdi NS et al (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast including the nipple and the areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shlenz I et al (2000) The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905–908CrossRef Shlenz I et al (2000) The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905–908CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contraction after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):532–543CrossRef Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contraction after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):532–543CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Deva AK, Chang LC (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a cause for accelerated capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 19:130–133CrossRef Deva AK, Chang LC (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a cause for accelerated capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 19:130–133CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Van Heerden J, Turner M, Hoffman D, Moolman J (2009) Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:610–617CrossRef Van Heerden J, Turner M, Hoffman D, Moolman J (2009) Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:610–617CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lista F, Ahmad J (2013) Evidence-based medicine: augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1684–1696CrossRef Lista F, Ahmad J (2013) Evidence-based medicine: augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1684–1696CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) The greatest myths in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1895–1903CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) The greatest myths in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1895–1903CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perinipple mammaplasty
Authors
Luiz Fernando Frascino
Stefano Pompei
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01566-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue