Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 2/2022

01-02-2022 | Paediatric Neuroradiology

Clinical adaptation of synthetic MRI-based whole brain volume segmentation in children at 3 T: comparison with modified SPM segmentation methods

Authors: So Mi Lee, Eunji Kim, Sun Kyoung You, Hyun-Hae Cho, Moon Jung Hwang, Myong-Hun Hahm, Seung Hyun Cho, Won Hwa Kim, Hye Jung Kim, Kyung Min Shin, Byunggeon Park, Yongmin Chang

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To validate the use of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) volumetry by comparing with child-optimized SPM 12 volumetry in 3 T pediatric neuroimaging.

Methods

In total, 106 children aged 4.7–18.7 years who underwent both synthetic and 3D T1-weighted imaging and had no abnormal imaging/neurologic findings were included for the SyMRI vs. SPM T1-only segmentation (SPM T1). Forty of the 106 children who underwent an additional 3D T2-weighted imaging were included for the SyMRI vs. SPM multispectral segmentation (SPM multi). SPM segmentation using an age-appropriate atlas and inverse-transforming template-space intracranial mask was compared with SyMRI segmentation. Volume differences between SyMRI and SPM T1 were plotted against age to evaluate the influence of age on volume difference.

Results

Measurements derived from SyMRI and two SPM methods showed excellent agreements and strong correlations except for the CSF volume (CSFV) (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.87–0.98; r = 0.78–0.96; relative volume difference other than CSFV = 6.8–18.5% [SyMRI vs. SPM T1] and 11.3–22.7% [SyMRI vs. SPM multi]). Dice coefficients of all brain tissues (except CSF) were in the range 0.78–0.91. The Bland–Altman plot and age-related volume difference change suggested that the volume differences between the two methods were influenced by the volume of each brain tissue and subject’s age (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

SyMRI and SPM segmentation results were consistent except for CSFV, which supports routine clinical use of SyMRI-based volumetry in pediatric neuroimaging. However, caution should be taken in the interpretation of the CSF segmentation results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) Fsl. Neuroimage 62:782–790CrossRef Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) Fsl. Neuroimage 62:782–790CrossRef
4.
go back to reference West J, Warntjes JB, Lundberg P (2012) Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI. Eur Radiol 22:998–1007CrossRef West J, Warntjes JB, Lundberg P (2012) Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI. Eur Radiol 22:998–1007CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warntjes JB, Leinhard OD, West J, Lundberg P (2008) Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 60:320–329CrossRef Warntjes JB, Leinhard OD, West J, Lundberg P (2008) Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 60:320–329CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goncalves FG, Serai SD, Zuccoli G (2018) Synthetic brain MRI: review of current concepts and future directions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:387–393CrossRef Goncalves FG, Serai SD, Zuccoli G (2018) Synthetic brain MRI: review of current concepts and future directions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:387–393CrossRef
8.
go back to reference West J, Blystad I, Engstrom M, Warntjes JB, Lundberg P (2013) Application of quantitative MRI for brain tissue segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths. PLoS One 8:e74795CrossRef West J, Blystad I, Engstrom M, Warntjes JB, Lundberg P (2013) Application of quantitative MRI for brain tissue segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths. PLoS One 8:e74795CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vagberg M, Lindqvist T, Ambarki K et al (2013) Automated determination of brain parenchymal fraction in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:498–504CrossRef Vagberg M, Lindqvist T, Ambarki K et al (2013) Automated determination of brain parenchymal fraction in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:498–504CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hagiwara A, Hori M, Cohen-Adad J et al (2019) Linearity, bias, intrascanner repeatability, and interscanner reproducibility of quantitative multidynamic multiecho sequence for rapid simultaneous relaxometry at 3 T: a validation study with a standardized phantom and healthy controls. Invest Radiol 54:39–47CrossRef Hagiwara A, Hori M, Cohen-Adad J et al (2019) Linearity, bias, intrascanner repeatability, and interscanner reproducibility of quantitative multidynamic multiecho sequence for rapid simultaneous relaxometry at 3 T: a validation study with a standardized phantom and healthy controls. Invest Radiol 54:39–47CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Granberg T, Uppman M, Hashim F et al (2016) Clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic and volumetric validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:1023–1029CrossRef Granberg T, Uppman M, Hashim F et al (2016) Clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic and volumetric validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:1023–1029CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ambarki K, Lindqvist T, Wahlin A et al (2012) Evaluation of automatic measurement of the intracranial volume based on quantitative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1951–1956CrossRef Ambarki K, Lindqvist T, Wahlin A et al (2012) Evaluation of automatic measurement of the intracranial volume based on quantitative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1951–1956CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McAllister A, Leach J, West H, Jones B, Zhang B, Serai S (2017) Quantitative synthetic MRI in children: normative intracranial tissue segmentation values during development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:2364–2372CrossRef McAllister A, Leach J, West H, Jones B, Zhang B, Serai S (2017) Quantitative synthetic MRI in children: normative intracranial tissue segmentation values during development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:2364–2372CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Serai SD, Dudley J, Leach JL (2019) Comparison of whole brain segmentation and volume estimation in children and young adults using SPM and SyMRI. Clin Imaging 57:77–82CrossRef Serai SD, Dudley J, Leach JL (2019) Comparison of whole brain segmentation and volume estimation in children and young adults using SPM and SyMRI. Clin Imaging 57:77–82CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim HG, Moon WJ, Han J, Choi JW (2017) Quantification of myelin in children using multiparametric quantitative MRI: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 59:1043–1051CrossRef Kim HG, Moon WJ, Han J, Choi JW (2017) Quantification of myelin in children using multiparametric quantitative MRI: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 59:1043–1051CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hedman AM, van Haren NE, Schnack HG, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE (2012) Human brain changes across the life span: a review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1987–2002CrossRef Hedman AM, van Haren NE, Schnack HG, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE (2012) Human brain changes across the life span: a review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1987–2002CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee SM, Choi YH, You SK et al (2018) Age-related changes in tissue value properties in children: simultaneous quantification of relaxation times and proton density using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 53:236–245CrossRef Lee SM, Choi YH, You SK et al (2018) Age-related changes in tissue value properties in children: simultaneous quantification of relaxation times and proton density using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 53:236–245CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Andica C, Hagiwara A, Hori M et al (2019) Review of synthetic MRI in pediatric brains: basic principle of MR quantification, its features, clinical applications, and limitations. J Neuroradiol 46:268–275CrossRef Andica C, Hagiwara A, Hori M et al (2019) Review of synthetic MRI in pediatric brains: basic principle of MR quantification, its features, clinical applications, and limitations. J Neuroradiol 46:268–275CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Heinen R, Bouvy WH, Mendrik AM, Viergever MA, Biessels GJ, de Bresser J (2016) Robustness of automated methods for brain volume measurements across different MRI field strengths. PLoS One 11:e0165719CrossRef Heinen R, Bouvy WH, Mendrik AM, Viergever MA, Biessels GJ, de Bresser J (2016) Robustness of automated methods for brain volume measurements across different MRI field strengths. PLoS One 11:e0165719CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hansen TI, Brezova V, Eikenes L, Haberg A, Vangberg TR (2015) How does the accuracy of intracranial volume measurements affect normalized brain volumes? Sample size estimates based on 966 subjects from the HUNT MRI cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:1450–1456CrossRef Hansen TI, Brezova V, Eikenes L, Haberg A, Vangberg TR (2015) How does the accuracy of intracranial volume measurements affect normalized brain volumes? Sample size estimates based on 966 subjects from the HUNT MRI cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:1450–1456CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Keihaninejad S, Heckemann RA, Fagiolo G et al (2010) A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T). Neuroimage 50:1427–1437CrossRef Keihaninejad S, Heckemann RA, Fagiolo G et al (2010) A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T). Neuroimage 50:1427–1437CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Malone IB, Leung KK, Clegg S et al (2015) Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance. Neuroimage 104:366–372CrossRef Malone IB, Leung KK, Clegg S et al (2015) Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance. Neuroimage 104:366–372CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lindig T, Kotikalapudi R, Schweikardt D et al (2018) Evaluation of multimodal segmentation based on 3D T1-, T2- and FLAIR-weighted images - the difficulty of choosing. Neuroimage 170:210–221CrossRef Lindig T, Kotikalapudi R, Schweikardt D et al (2018) Evaluation of multimodal segmentation based on 3D T1-, T2- and FLAIR-weighted images - the difficulty of choosing. Neuroimage 170:210–221CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kotikalapudi R, Martin P, Marquetand J, Lindig T, Bender B, Focke NK (2018) Systematic assessment of multispectral voxel-based morphometry in previously MRI-negative focal epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:2014–2021CrossRef Kotikalapudi R, Martin P, Marquetand J, Lindig T, Bender B, Focke NK (2018) Systematic assessment of multispectral voxel-based morphometry in previously MRI-negative focal epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:2014–2021CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Evans AC, Brain Development Cooperative G (2006) The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Neuroimage 30:184–202CrossRef Evans AC, Brain Development Cooperative G (2006) The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Neuroimage 30:184–202CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wilke M, Holland SK, Altaye M, Gaser C (2008) Template-O-Matic: a toolbox for creating customized pediatric templates. Neuroimage 41:903–913CrossRef Wilke M, Holland SK, Altaye M, Gaser C (2008) Template-O-Matic: a toolbox for creating customized pediatric templates. Neuroimage 41:903–913CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Biffen SC, Warton CMR, Dodge NC et al (2020) Validity of automated FreeSurfer segmentation compared to manual tracing in detecting prenatal alcohol exposure-related subcortical and corpus callosal alterations in 9- to 11-year-old children. Neuroimage Clin 28:102368CrossRef Biffen SC, Warton CMR, Dodge NC et al (2020) Validity of automated FreeSurfer segmentation compared to manual tracing in detecting prenatal alcohol exposure-related subcortical and corpus callosal alterations in 9- to 11-year-old children. Neuroimage Clin 28:102368CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Guenette JP, Stern RA, Tripodis Y et al (2018) Automated versus manual segmentation of brain region volumes in former football players. Neuroimage Clin 18:888–896CrossRef Guenette JP, Stern RA, Tripodis Y et al (2018) Automated versus manual segmentation of brain region volumes in former football players. Neuroimage Clin 18:888–896CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Andica C, Hagiwara A, Hori M et al (2018) Automated brain tissue and myelin volumetry based on quantitative MR imaging with various in-plane resolutions. J Neuroradiol 45:164–168CrossRef Andica C, Hagiwara A, Hori M et al (2018) Automated brain tissue and myelin volumetry based on quantitative MR imaging with various in-plane resolutions. J Neuroradiol 45:164–168CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Saccenti L, Andica C, Hagiwara A et al (2019) Brain tissue and myelin volumetric analysis in multiple sclerosis at 3T MRI with various in-plane resolutions using synthetic MRI. Neuroradiology 61:1219–1227CrossRef Saccenti L, Andica C, Hagiwara A et al (2019) Brain tissue and myelin volumetric analysis in multiple sclerosis at 3T MRI with various in-plane resolutions using synthetic MRI. Neuroradiology 61:1219–1227CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, Palmer AC (1994) Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13:716–724CrossRef Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, Palmer AC (1994) Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13:716–724CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nordenskjold R, Malmberg F, Larsson EM et al (2013) Intracranial volume estimated with commonly used methods could introduce bias in studies including brain volume measurements. Neuroimage 83:355–360CrossRef Nordenskjold R, Malmberg F, Larsson EM et al (2013) Intracranial volume estimated with commonly used methods could introduce bias in studies including brain volume measurements. Neuroimage 83:355–360CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Phan TV, Smeets D, Talcott JB, Vandermosten M (2018) Processing of structural neuroimaging data in young children: bridging the gap between current practice and state-of-the-art methods. Dev Cogn Neurosci 33:206–223CrossRef Phan TV, Smeets D, Talcott JB, Vandermosten M (2018) Processing of structural neuroimaging data in young children: bridging the gap between current practice and state-of-the-art methods. Dev Cogn Neurosci 33:206–223CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mills KL, Tamnes CK (2014) Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development. Dev Cogn Neurosci 9:172–190CrossRef Mills KL, Tamnes CK (2014) Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development. Dev Cogn Neurosci 9:172–190CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical adaptation of synthetic MRI-based whole brain volume segmentation in children at 3 T: comparison with modified SPM segmentation methods
Authors
So Mi Lee
Eunji Kim
Sun Kyoung You
Hyun-Hae Cho
Moon Jung Hwang
Myong-Hun Hahm
Seung Hyun Cho
Won Hwa Kim
Hye Jung Kim
Kyung Min Shin
Byunggeon Park
Yongmin Chang
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02779-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Neuroradiology 2/2022 Go to the issue