Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Calcified Tissue International 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Research

The Risk-Stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE): A Randomized Prospective Population-Based Study. Design and Baseline Characteristics

Authors: Katrine Hass Rubin, Teresa Holmberg, Mette Juel Rothmann, Mikkel Høiberg, Reinhard Barkmann, Jeppe Gram, Anne Pernille Hermann, Mickael Bech, Ole Rasmussen, Claus C. Glüer, Kim Brixen

Published in: Calcified Tissue International | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE) is a randomized prospective population-based study investigating the effectiveness of a two-step screening program for osteoporosis in women. This paper reports the study design and baseline characteristics of the study population. 35,000 women aged 65–80 years were selected at random from the population in the Region of Southern Denmark and—before inclusion—randomized to either a screening group or a control group. As first step, a self-administered questionnaire regarding risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX® was issued to both groups. As second step, subjects in the screening group with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures ≥15 % were offered a DXA scan. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis from the DXA scan were advised to see their GP and discuss pharmaceutical treatment according to Danish National guidelines. The primary outcome is incident clinical fractures as evaluated through annual follow-up using the Danish National Patient Registry. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, participation rate, and patient preferences. 20,904 (60 %) women participated and included in the baseline analyses (10,411 in screening and 10,949 in control group). The mean age was 71 years. As expected by randomization, the screening and control groups had similar baseline characteristics. Screening for osteoporosis is at present not evidence based according to the WHO screening criteria. The ROSE study is expected to provide knowledge of the effectiveness of a screening strategy that may be implemented in health care systems to prevent fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vestergaard P, Lindholm J, Jorgensen JO et al (2002) Increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 146:51–56CrossRefPubMed Vestergaard P, Lindholm J, Jorgensen JO et al (2002) Increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 146:51–56CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan S, Markson LE, Siris ES (2006) Impact of recent fracture on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 21:809–816CrossRefPubMed Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan S, Markson LE, Siris ES (2006) Impact of recent fracture on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 21:809–816CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007) Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 10:102–110CrossRefPubMed Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007) Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 10:102–110CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rossouw JE (2005) Coronary heart disease in menopausal women: implications of primary and secondary prevention trials of hormones. Maturitas 51:51–63CrossRefPubMed Rossouw JE (2005) Coronary heart disease in menopausal women: implications of primary and secondary prevention trials of hormones. Maturitas 51:51–63CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P (2008) Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 23:CD001155 Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P (2008) Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 23:CD001155
7.
go back to reference Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH et al (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282:637–645CrossRefPubMed Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH et al (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282:637–645CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E et al (2004) The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 350:459–468CrossRefPubMed Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E et al (2004) The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 350:459–468CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR et al (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441CrossRefPubMed Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR et al (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R et al (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 356:1809–1822CrossRefPubMed Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R et al (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 356:1809–1822CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cummings SR, San MJ, McClung MR et al (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, San MJ, McClung MR et al (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Christensen PM, Brixen K, Gyrd-Hansen D, Kristiansen IS (2005) Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Danish women. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 96:387–396CrossRefPubMed Christensen PM, Brixen K, Gyrd-Hansen D, Kristiansen IS (2005) Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Danish women. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 96:387–396CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jonsson B, Strom O, Eisman JA, Papaioannou A, Siris ES, Tosteson A, Kanis JA (2011) Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22:967–982CrossRefPubMed Jonsson B, Strom O, Eisman JA, Papaioannou A, Siris ES, Tosteson A, Kanis JA (2011) Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22:967–982CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dansk Knoglemedicinsk S, Danish Bonemedical S (2009) Vejledning til udredning og behandling of Osteoporose. [Instrutions to diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis] Dansk Knoglemedicinsk S, Danish Bonemedical S (2009) Vejledning til udredning og behandling of Osteoporose. [Instrutions to diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis]
15.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Prevalence of risk factors for fractures and use of DXA scanning in Danish women. A regional population-based study. Osteoporos Int 22:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Prevalence of risk factors for fractures and use of DXA scanning in Danish women. A regional population-based study. Osteoporos Int 22:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16:134–141CrossRefPubMed Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16:134–141CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2011) Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154:356–364CrossRef U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2011) Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154:356–364CrossRef
18.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis F (2013) Clinicianïs guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington DC National Osteoporosis F (2013) Clinicianïs guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington DC
19.
go back to reference Wilson JM, Jungner YG (1968) Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 65:281–393PubMed Wilson JM, Jungner YG (1968) Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 65:281–393PubMed
20.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Metge C, Ward L (2003) Contribution of clinical risk factors to bone density-based absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 14:334–338CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Metge C, Ward L (2003) Contribution of clinical risk factors to bone density-based absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 14:334–338CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K (2013) Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. J Bone Miner Res 28:1701–1717CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K (2013) Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. J Bone Miner Res 28:1701–1717CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:b4229CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:b4229CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444CrossRefPubMed Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates. Scand J Public Health 39:312–318CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates. Scand J Public Health 39:312–318CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dachverband Osteologie (2011) DVO Guideline 2009 for prevention, diagnosis and Therapy of osteoporosis in adults. Osteologie 20:55–74 Dachverband Osteologie (2011) DVO Guideline 2009 for prevention, diagnosis and Therapy of osteoporosis in adults. Osteologie 20:55–74
27.
go back to reference Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM et al (2004) Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:782–793CrossRefPubMed Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM et al (2004) Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:782–793CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148CrossRefPubMed Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Frost M, Wraae K, Abrahamsen B, Hoiberg M, Hagen C, Andersen M, Brixen K (2012) Osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in men aged 60–74 years. Age Ageing 41:171–177CrossRefPubMed Frost M, Wraae K, Abrahamsen B, Hoiberg M, Hagen C, Andersen M, Brixen K (2012) Osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in men aged 60–74 years. Age Ageing 41:171–177CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH (1999) The Danish National Hospital Discharge Register. A valuable source of data for modern health science. Dan Med Bull 46:263–268PubMed Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH (1999) The Danish National Hospital Discharge Register. A valuable source of data for modern health science. Dan Med Bull 46:263–268PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (2011) The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 39:38–41CrossRefPubMed Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (2011) The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 39:38–41CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Barkmann R, Gluer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Barkmann R, Gluer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Shepstone L, Fordham R, Lenaghan E et al (2012) A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 23:2507–2515CrossRefPubMed Shepstone L, Fordham R, Lenaghan E et al (2012) A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 23:2507–2515CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G et al (2011) Prediction of absolute risk of fragility fracture at 10 years in a Spanish population: validation of the WHO FRAX tool in Spain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:30CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G et al (2011) Prediction of absolute risk of fragility fracture at 10 years in a Spanish population: validation of the WHO FRAX tool in Spain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:30CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bolland MJ, Siu AT, Mason BH, Horne AM, Ames RW, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR (2011) Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. J Bone Miner Res 26:420–427CrossRefPubMed Bolland MJ, Siu AT, Mason BH, Horne AM, Ames RW, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR (2011) Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. J Bone Miner Res 26:420–427CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Cummins NM, Poku EK, Towler MR, O’Driscoll OM, Ralston SH (2011) Clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores. Calcif Tissue Int 89:172–177CrossRefPubMed Cummins NM, Poku EK, Towler MR, O’Driscoll OM, Ralston SH (2011) Clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores. Calcif Tissue Int 89:172–177CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Sambrook PN, Flahive J, Hooven FH et al (2011) Predicting fractures in an international cohort using risk factor algorithms without BMD. J Bone Miner Res 26:2770–2777CrossRefPubMed Sambrook PN, Flahive J, Hooven FH et al (2011) Predicting fractures in an international cohort using risk factor algorithms without BMD. J Bone Miner Res 26:2770–2777CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sandhu SK, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2010) Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram. Osteoporos Int 21:863–871CrossRefPubMed Sandhu SK, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2010) Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram. Osteoporos Int 21:863–871CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Tamaki J, Iki M, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Kajita E, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H (2011) Fracture risk prediction using FRAX(R): a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study. Osteoporos Int 22:3037–3045CrossRefPubMed Tamaki J, Iki M, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Kajita E, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H (2011) Fracture risk prediction using FRAX(R): a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study. Osteoporos Int 22:3037–3045CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Drewniak N, Laparra J, Ribot CA, Dargent-Molina P (2010) Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool. J Bone Miner Res 25:1002–1009CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Drewniak N, Laparra J, Ribot CA, Dargent-Molina P (2010) Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool. J Bone Miner Res 25:1002–1009CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
42.
go back to reference Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Seymour DG, Reid DM (2005) Screening elderly women for risk of future fractures–participation rates and impact on incidence of falls and fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 76:243–248CrossRefPubMed Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Seymour DG, Reid DM (2005) Screening elderly women for risk of future fractures–participation rates and impact on incidence of falls and fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 76:243–248CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Schneider DL, Worley K, Beard MK, Iannini M, Ko M, McCallum J, Pulicharam R, Steinbuch M (2010) The primary care osteoporosis risk of fracture screening (POROS) study: design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 31:336–344CrossRefPubMed Schneider DL, Worley K, Beard MK, Iannini M, Ko M, McCallum J, Pulicharam R, Steinbuch M (2010) The primary care osteoporosis risk of fracture screening (POROS) study: design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 31:336–344CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Lacroix AZ, Buist DS, Brenneman SK, Abbott TA III (2005) Evaluation of three population-based strategies for fracture prevention: results of the osteoporosis population-based risk assessment (OPRA) trial. Med Care 43:293–302CrossRefPubMed Lacroix AZ, Buist DS, Brenneman SK, Abbott TA III (2005) Evaluation of three population-based strategies for fracture prevention: results of the osteoporosis population-based risk assessment (OPRA) trial. Med Care 43:293–302CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Dargent-Molina P, Piault S, Breart G (2003) A comparison of different screening strategies to identify elderly women at high risk of hip fracture: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:969–977CrossRefPubMed Dargent-Molina P, Piault S, Breart G (2003) A comparison of different screening strategies to identify elderly women at high risk of hip fracture: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:969–977CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Taylor BC, Schousboe JT, Donaldson MG, Fink HA, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Browner WS, Cummings SR (2009) A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better? Arch Intern Med 169:2087–2094CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Taylor BC, Schousboe JT, Donaldson MG, Fink HA, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Browner WS, Cummings SR (2009) A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better? Arch Intern Med 169:2087–2094CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Risk-Stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE): A Randomized Prospective Population-Based Study. Design and Baseline Characteristics
Authors
Katrine Hass Rubin
Teresa Holmberg
Mette Juel Rothmann
Mikkel Høiberg
Reinhard Barkmann
Jeppe Gram
Anne Pernille Hermann
Mickael Bech
Ole Rasmussen
Claus C. Glüer
Kim Brixen
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Calcified Tissue International / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0171-967X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9950-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Calcified Tissue International 2/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine