Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 3/2013

01-02-2013 | Research Article

Stimulus–response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss

Authors: Benjamin A. Philip, Scott H. Frey

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Previous findings show an advantage in response speed when stimulus and response correspond spatially (i.e., the Simon effect). Chronic unilateral amputees show altered spatial perception near their affected hand, providing an opportunity to investigate whether experience also affects the visuomotor stimulus–response (S–R) mapping that underlies the Simon effect. We used a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm to probe the spatial correspondence between visual cues and responses, in 14 unilateral upper limb amputees and 14 matched controls. We presented visual stimuli in 5 different locations within peripersonal space, including the midline, and found a smooth gradient of S–R correspondence effects. This is consistent with the hypothesis that S–R correspondence is represented along a spatial gradient. Unilateral amputees performed indistinguishably from matched controls, regardless of whether stimuli appeared in the hemispace ipsi- or contralateral to their missing limbs. This is inconsistent with the hypothesis that experience-dependent visual distortions entail changes in the S–R mapping; alternatively, it could reflect a complete experience independence of the Simon effect. We propose that the affordance competition hypothesis (Cisek in Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1585–1599, 2007) explains the Simon effect and the underlying gradient of S–R correspondence.
Literature
go back to reference Anzola GP, Bertoloni G, Buchtel HA, Rizzolatti G (1977) Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15:295–302PubMedCrossRef Anzola GP, Bertoloni G, Buchtel HA, Rizzolatti G (1977) Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15:295–302PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:731–750PubMedCrossRef De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:731–750PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boson Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boson
go back to reference Hommel B, Muesseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937PubMedCrossRef Hommel B, Muesseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H (1999) Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci 2:501–502 Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H (1999) Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci 2:501–502
go back to reference Mewaldt SP, Connelly CL, Simon R (1980) Response selection in choice reaction time: test of a buffer model. Mem Cognit 8:606–611PubMedCrossRef Mewaldt SP, Connelly CL, Simon R (1980) Response selection in choice reaction time: test of a buffer model. Mem Cognit 8:606–611PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nico D, Daprati E, Rigal F, Parsons L, Sirigu A (2004) Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain 127:120–132 Nico D, Daprati E, Rigal F, Parsons L, Sirigu A (2004) Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain 127:120–132
go back to reference Nicoletti R, Umilta C (1989) Splitting visual space with attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:164–169PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti R, Umilta C (1989) Splitting visual space with attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:164–169PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nicoletti R, Umilta C (1994) Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol Res 56:144–150PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti R, Umilta C (1994) Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol Res 56:144–150PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nicoletti R, Anzola GP, Luppino G, Rizzolatti G, Umilta C (1982) Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:664–673PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti R, Anzola GP, Luppino G, Rizzolatti G, Umilta C (1982) Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:664–673PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield R (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRef Oldfield R (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Philip BA, Frey SH (2011) Preserved grip selection planning in chronic unilateral upper extremity amputees. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung Expérimentation cérébrale 214:437–452. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2842-5 CrossRef Philip BA, Frey SH (2011) Preserved grip selection planning in chronic unilateral upper extremity amputees. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung Expérimentation cérébrale 214:437–452. doi:10.​1007/​s00221-011-2842-5 CrossRef
go back to reference Rabbitt P (1978) Hand dominance, attention, and the choice between responses. Q J Exp Psychol 30:407–416PubMedCrossRef Rabbitt P (1978) Hand dominance, attention, and the choice between responses. Q J Exp Psychol 30:407–416PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umilta C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40PubMedCrossRef Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umilta C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rubichi S, Nicoletti R, Iani C, Umiltà C (1997) The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1353–1364PubMedCrossRef Rubichi S, Nicoletti R, Iani C, Umiltà C (1997) The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1353–1364PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simon JR, Berbaum K (1990) Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the ‘Stroop effect’ vs. the ‘Simon effect’. Acta Psychol (Amst) 73:159–170CrossRef Simon JR, Berbaum K (1990) Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the ‘Stroop effect’ vs. the ‘Simon effect’. Acta Psychol (Amst) 73:159–170CrossRef
go back to reference Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304PubMedCrossRef Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simon JR, Small AM (1969) Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. J Appl Psychol 53:433–435PubMedCrossRef Simon JR, Small AM (1969) Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. J Appl Psychol 53:433–435PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Valle-Inclán F, Redondo M (1998) On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology 35:366–371PubMedCrossRef Valle-Inclán F, Redondo M (1998) On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology 35:366–371PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wascher E, Schatz U, Kuder T, Verleger R (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:731–751PubMedCrossRef Wascher E, Schatz U, Kuder T, Verleger R (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:731–751PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stimulus–response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss
Authors
Benjamin A. Philip
Scott H. Frey
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3317-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Experimental Brain Research 3/2013 Go to the issue